Climate-Smart Agriculture Technologies and Determinants of Farmers' Adoption Decisions in the Great Rift Valley of Ethiopia

被引:9
|
作者
Sisay, Theodrose [1 ,2 ]
Tesfaye, Kindie [3 ]
Ketema, Mengistu [4 ]
Dechassa, Nigussie [5 ]
Getnet, Mezegebu [2 ]
机构
[1] Haramaya Univ, Africa Ctr Excellence Climate Smart Agr & Biodive, POB 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
[2] Ethiopian Inst Agr Res EIAR, POB 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, POB 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[4] Haramaya Univ, Sch Agr & Agribusiness, POB 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
[5] Haramaya Univ, Coll Agr & Environm Sci, Sch Plant Sci, POB 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
关键词
climate change; climate-smart agriculture; smallholder farmers; multivariate probit model; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; VULNERABILITY; PRODUCTIVITY; SMALLHOLDERS;
D O I
10.3390/su15043471
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agriculture is a sector that is very vulnerable to the effects of climate change while contributing to anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to the atmosphere. Therefore, applying Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) technologies and practices (referee hereafter as CSA technologies) that can sustainably boost productivity, improve resilience, and lower GHG emissions are crucial for a climate resilient agriculture. This study sought to identify the CSA technologies used by farmers and assess adoption levels and factors that influence them. A cross-sectional survey was carried out gather information from 384 smallholder farmers in the Great Rift Valley (GRV) of Ethiopia. Data were analyzed using percentage, chi-square test, t test, and the multivariate probit model. Results showed that crop diversification, agroforestry, and integrated soil fertility management were the most widely practiced technologies. The results of the chi-square and t tests showed that there are differences and significant and positive connections between adopters and non-adopters based on various attributes. The chi-square and t test results confirmed that households who were older and who had higher incomes, greater credit access, climate information access, better training, better education, larger farms, higher incomes, and more frequent interactions with extension specialists had positive and significant associations with CSA technology adopters. The model result showed that age, sex, and education of the head; farmland size; livestock ownership; income; access to credit; access to climate information; training; and extension contact influenced the adoption of CSA technologies. Therefore, considering barriers to the adoption of CSA technologies, in policy and action is anticipated to support smallholder farmers in adapting to climate change while lowering GHG emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors Influencing the Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Technologies Among Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana
    Abraham Zakaria
    Suhiyini I. Alhassan
    John K. M. Kuwornu
    Shaibu B. Azumah
    Mercy A. A. Derkyi
    Earth Systems and Environment, 2020, 4 : 257 - 271
  • [32] Adoption Determinants of Adapted Climate Smart Agriculture Technologies Among Smallholder Farmers in Machakos, Makueni, and Kitui Counties of Kenya
    Lydia, Muriithi
    Charles, Onyari N.
    Hezron, Mogaka R.
    Bernard, Gichimu M.
    Geoffrey, Gatumo N.
    Kizito, Kwena
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION, 2021, 25 (02): : 75 - 85
  • [33] Climate-smart water technologies for sustainable agriculture: a review
    Patle, G. T.
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Khanna, Manoj
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 11 (04) : 1455 - 1466
  • [34] Adaptive responses and determinants of adaptation decisions to climate change: evidence from rainfed-dependent farmers in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia
    Bedo, Denbel
    Mekuriaw, Abate
    Bantider, Amare
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [35] Is conservation agriculture ‘climate-smart’ for maize farmers in the highlands of Tanzania?
    Anthony A. Kimaro
    Mathew Mpanda
    Janie Rioux
    Ermias Aynekulu
    Samuel Shaba
    Margaret Thiong’o
    Paul Mutuo
    Sheila Abwanda
    Keith Shepherd
    Henry Neufeldt
    Todd S. Rosenstock
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2016, 105 : 217 - 228
  • [36] Is conservation agriculture 'climate-smart' for maize farmers in the highlands of Tanzania?
    Kimaro, Anthony A.
    Mpanda, Mathew
    Rioux, Janie
    Aynekulu, Ermias
    Shaba, Samuel
    Thiong'o, Margaret
    Mutuo, Paul
    Abwanda, Sheila
    Shepherd, Keith
    Neufeldt, Henry
    Rosenstock, Todd S.
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2016, 105 (03) : 217 - 228
  • [37] Farmers’ adaptation to climate-smart agriculture (CSA) in NW Turkey
    Bengü Everest
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 4215 - 4235
  • [38] Farmers' adaptation to climate-smart agriculture (CSA) in NW Turkey
    Everest, Bengu
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (03) : 4215 - 4235
  • [39] The adoption of climate-smart agriculture to address wildfires in the Maya Golden Landscape of Belize: Smallholder farmers' perceptions
    Chicas, Santos Daniel
    Nielsen, Jonas Ostergaard
    Robinson, Guy M.
    Mizoue, Nobuya
    Ota, Tetsuji
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 345
  • [40] Factors Influencing Farmers' Adoption of Climate-Smart Agriculture in Rice Production in Vietnam's Mekong Delta
    Luu Tien Dung
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 17 (01): : 109 - 124