Quality of life after brain injury-overall scale, Japanese version: assessment of reliability and validity

被引:0
|
作者
Suzuki, Megumi [1 ]
Wu, Yi-Jhen [2 ]
Ota, Kikuo [3 ]
von Wild, Klaus R. H. [4 ]
Naito, Mariko [5 ]
Maeda, Akiko [6 ]
Hirano, Asuka [7 ]
Yamada, Masayuki [5 ]
Saitoh, Eiichi [3 ]
Kondo, Izumi [8 ]
Zeldovich, Marina [9 ]
von Steinbuechel, Nicole [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Fujita Hlth Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, 1-98 Dengakugakubo,Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[2] Georg August Univ, Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Inst Med Psychol & Med Sociol, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Fujita Hlth Univ, Sch Med, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[4] Fujita Hlth Univ, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[5] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
[6] Fujita Hlth Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[7] Fujita Hlth Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[8] Natl Ctr Geriatr & Gerontol, Dept Rehabil Med, Obu, Aichi, Japan
[9] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Psychol, Vienna, Austria
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Quality of life; traumatic brain injury; cognitive dysfunction; validity; Patient-Reported Outcome; HEALTH SURVEY; QOLIBRI; SF-36;
D O I
10.1080/02699052.2024.2309652
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study analyzed the linguistic and psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS) consisting of six items which cover several TBI-relevant domains. We hypothesized that the Japanese version has good reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity, compared with its long version, the 37-item QOLIBRI. The QOLIBRI-OS Japanese version was forward and back-translated from the English version. In total, 129 individuals participated in this study after experiencing a traumatic brain injury and attending clinics, rehabilitation centers, and support centers in Japan. The structure of the QOLIBRI-OS was investigated by confirmatory factor analyses and compared with the QOLIBRI. Only one factor was extracted, and a model with one underlying factor had a good fit. The QOLIBRI-OS showed good-to-excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The QOLIBRI-OS was positively correlated with the QOLIBRI, Short Form Health Survey-36 version 2, and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, and negatively correlated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The results suggest that the QOLIBRI-OS Japanese version is a reliable and valid tool for assessing disease-specific health-related QOL in individuals after traumatic brain injury in Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 266
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Turkish version of the drug hypersensitivity quality of life questionnaire: assessment of reliability and validity
    Bavbek, S.
    Ozdemir, Kepil S.
    Erdogan, Doganay B.
    Karaboga, I
    Buyukozturk, S.
    Gelincik, A.
    Yilmaz, I
    Goksel, O.
    Dursun, A. B.
    Karakaya, G.
    Kalyoncu, A. F.
    Ozseker, F.
    Karakis, Pasaoglu G.
    Erkekol, Oner F.
    Koycu, G.
    Keren, M.
    Baiardini, I
    Romano, A.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2015, 70 : 249 - 250
  • [32] Turkish version of the Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire: assessment of reliability and validity
    Sevim Bavbek
    Seçil Kepil Özdemir
    Beyza Doğanay Erdoğan
    Işıl Karaboğa
    Suna Büyüköztürk
    Aslı Gelincik
    İnsu Yılmaz
    Özlem Göksel
    Adile Berna Dursun
    Gül Karakaya
    Ali Fuat Kalyoncu
    Ferhan Özşeker
    Gülden Paşaoğlu Karakış
    Ferda Öner Erkekol
    Gözde Köycü
    Metin Keren
    Ilaria Baiardini
    Antonino Romano
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 101 - 109
  • [33] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the weight bias internalization scale
    Shota Endo
    Hideaki Kasuga
    Masuishi Yusuke
    Tomoo Hidaka
    Takeyasu Kakamu
    Tetsuhito Fukushima
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 15
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Gratitude at Work Scale (GAWS)
    Komase, Yu
    Watanabe, Kazuhiro
    Sasaki, Natsu
    Kawakami, Norito
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2020, 62 (01)
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
    Ochiai, Yuko
    Otsuka, Yasumasa
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2022, 60 (05) : 436 - 446
  • [37] Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of 'Attitudes Towards the Elderly' scale
    Ogiwara, Shmipachir
    Inoue, Katsumi
    Koshimizu, Sayuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2007, 19 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [38] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the weight bias internalization scale
    Endo, Shota
    Kasuga, Hideaki
    Yusuke, Masuishi
    Hidaka, Tomoo
    Kakamu, Takeyasu
    Fukushima, Tetsuhito
    [J]. BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [39] Reliability and validity of the resilience competency scale: Japanese short version
    Terada, Takashi
    Kawano, Hitoshi
    Nagamine, Masanori
    Shigemura, Jun
    Nagamine, Mitsue
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2019, 73 (04) : 195 - 195
  • [40] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Recovery Assessment Scale
    Guler, Cansu
    Gurkan, Ayca
    [J]. DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 32 (04): : 309 - 319