The effects of agitation in anaerobic biodigesters operating with substrates from swine manure and rice husk

被引:3
|
作者
Leite, S. A. F. [1 ,2 ]
Leite, B. S. [1 ]
Ferreira, D. J. O. [3 ]
Baeta, B. E. L. [4 ]
Dangelo, J. V. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa UFV, Inst Sci & Technol, Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Chem Engn, Dept Chem Syst Engn, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Chem Engn, Diadema, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Ouro Preto UFOP, Environm Engn Grad Programs ProAmb, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
关键词
Swine manure; Rice husk; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Biodigestion Performance; RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CORN STOVER; DIGESTION; SCALE; WASTE; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2022.138533
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of agitation in anaerobic biodigesters affects biogas generation, but there is still no consensus on what is the best mechanism and the most appropriate intensity. In addition, there are many studies that do not provide necessary information to reproduce scale-up agitation. Qualitative terms such as "manually", "vigorously" and "minimally" are usually used to describe it. Based on this context, the objective of this work was to propose and evaluate a mixing model, which uses data from fluid and biodigesters characteristics, in order to calculate the time required for the system homogenization. This work combined Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation with experimental anaerobic biodigestion tests. The experimental tests performed the codigestion with a mixture of swine manure and rice husk, as substrate. From the CFD analysis, specially, from velocity profile it was possible to identify a similar mixing pattern from the substrate and water, and dead zones on the biodigester base (near the sludge). From heat flux analysis it could be seen the heat distribution was not uniform in the biodigester and some regions presented temperatures below 30 degrees C. According to the experimental results, the biodigester that used intermittent agitation showed a better performance of the codigestion process compared with the biodigester without agitation. Results were better for biogas production, process stability and volatile solids removal. The proposed model, based on mixing time, can be used as reference for the anaerobic biodigestion of fluids with low solids content.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of temperature and inoculation ratio on methane production and nutrient solubility of swine manure anaerobic digestion
    Cao, Leipeng
    Keener, Harold
    Huang, Zhenghua
    Liu, Yuhuan
    Ruan, Roger
    Xu, Fuqing
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 299
  • [42] Enhanced biomethane production with a low carbon footprint via anaerobic co-digestion of swine wastewater with rice husk
    Lin, Hung-Cheng
    Pan, Shu-Yuan
    Lin, Yu-, I
    Cao, Dan-Thanh Ngoc
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 891
  • [43] Effects of chlortetracycline, Cu and their combination on the performance and microbial community dynamics in swine manure anaerobic digestion
    Rui Wang
    Junya Zhang
    Jibao Liu
    Dawei Yu
    Hui Zhong
    Yawei Wang
    Meixue Chen
    Juan Tong
    Yuansong Wei
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 67 (05) : 206 - 215
  • [44] The effects of ammonia acclimation on biogas recovery and the microbial population in continuous anaerobic digestion of swine manure
    Jo, Yura
    Cayetano, Roent Dune A.
    Kim, Gi-Beom
    Park, Jungsu
    Kim, Sang-Hyoun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 212
  • [45] Effects of chlortetracycline, Cu and their combination on the performance and microbial community dynamics in swine manure anaerobic digestion
    Wang, Rui
    Zhang, Junya
    Liu, Jibao
    Yu, Dawei
    Zhong, Hui
    Wang, Yawei
    Chen, Meixue
    Tong, Juan
    Wei, Yuansong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2018, 67 : 206 - 215
  • [46] Effects of chlortetracycline amended feed on anaerobic sequencing batch reactor performance of swine manure digestion
    Dreher, Teal M.
    Mott, Henry V.
    Lupo, Christopher D.
    Oswald, Aaron S.
    Clay, Sharon A.
    Stone, James J.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 125 : 65 - 74
  • [47] Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and chicken feathers: Effects of manure maturation and microbial pretreatment of feathers on methane production
    Schommer, Vera Analise
    Wenzel, Bruno Munchen
    Daroit, Daniel Joner
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 152 : 1284 - 1291
  • [48] Anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and digested swine manure with different total solid concentration for methane production
    Darwin
    Cheng, Jay J.
    Liu, Zhimin
    Gontupil, Jorge
    Kwon, O-Seob
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 7 (06) : 79 - 90
  • [49] Effects of Rice Husk Biochar Attachment Biofilm with Microorganisms on Nitrogen Removal of Digested Swine Wastewater
    Pan, Fanghui
    Huang, Fei
    Wang, Youbao
    Zhu, Hongguang
    [J]. BIORESOURCES, 2024, 19 (03): : 6264 - 6280
  • [50] Effects of Metal Additives (Fe, Zn, and Sn) on the Co-Pyrolysis of Rice Husk and Cow Manure
    Qiu, Wen
    Liu, Ying
    Liu, Jiacheng
    Fan, Guozhi
    Song, Guangsen
    Cheng, Qunpeng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2023, 40 (09) : 402 - 410