Front-of-package nutrition labeling as a driver for healthier food choices: Lessons learned and future perspectives

被引:18
|
作者
Batista, Mariana Frazao [1 ,2 ]
de Carvalho-Ferreira, Joana Pereira [3 ,4 ]
da Cunha, Diogo Thimoteo [4 ]
De Rosso, Veridiana Vera [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Grad Program Nutr, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Nutr & Food Serv Res Ctr, Santos, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Biosci, Santos, Brazil
[4] State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Sch Appl Sci, Limeira, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Nutr & Food Serv Res Ctr, Rua Silva Jardim 136, BR-11015020 Santos, Brazil
关键词
consumer; eating behavior; health; nutrition labeling; packaged foods; TRAFFIC-LIGHT; CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; IMPACT; PRODUCTS; HEALTHFULNESS; INFORMATION; CONSUMPTION; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1111/1541-4337.13085
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This work aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of front-of-package nutritional labeling (FOPL), identify and characterize the major existing FOPL systems, examine the impact of FOPL systems on consumer behavior, and discuss future perspectives. The searched databases were PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and papers in English, Portuguese, Spanish, and French were considered. The integrative review method was used, comprising 68 papers. The FOPL system from more than 47 countries from North America, South America, Africa, Europe, Australia, and Asia was included in this study. The two main ways to characterize FOPL are the level of interpretation and the type of information provided. Interpretive schemes (such as warning labels, multiple traffic lights, and Nutri-Score) appear to lead to better consumer understanding and support healthier food purchases. However, due to the differences among the results and the specificity of the contexts in which they are used, it is impossible to define one FOPL interpretation scheme superior to the others. Some potential factors that influence the effectiveness of FOPL on consumer attitudes have been identified, such as food taste, as a major intrinsic factor. Extrinsic factors, such as price, food category, cultural diversity, politics, and economics, were also relevant. The lack of availability of similar alternatives, lack of understanding of the importance of FOPL, and lower levels of income and education were also some cognitive and social aspects impairing FOPL effectiveness. Prospects for the United States, Europe, Brazil, Colombia, and Argentina were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 586
页数:52
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhanced and Updated American Heart Association Heart-Check Front-of-Package Symbol: Efforts to Help Consumers Identify Healthier Food Choices
    Johnson, Rachel K.
    Lichtenstein, Alice H.
    Kris-Etherton, Penny M.
    Carson, Ann S.
    Pappas, Antigoni
    Rupp, Linda
    Vafiadis, Dorothea K.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2015, 115 (06) : 876 - 884
  • [32] Consumer Research Needs from the Food and Drug Administration on Front-of-Package Nutritional Labeling
    Andrews, J. Craig
    Lin, Chung-Tung Jordan
    Levy, Alan S.
    Lo, Serena
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 2014, 33 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [33] The Impact of Variations in a Fact-Based Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling System on Consumer Comprehension
    Edge, Marianne Smith
    Toner, Cheryl
    Kapsak, Wendy Reinhardt
    Geiger, Constance J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2014, 114 (06) : 843 - 854
  • [34] Shopper Response to Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Programs: Potential Consumer and Retail Store Benefits
    Newman, Christopher L.
    Howlett, Elizabeth
    Burton, Scot
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2014, 90 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [35] Choosing front-of-package food labelling nutritional criteria: how smart were 'Smart Choices'?
    Roberto, Christina A.
    Bragg, Marie A.
    Livingston, Kara A.
    Harris, Jennifer L.
    Thompson, Jackie M.
    Seamans, Marissa J.
    Brownell, Kelly D.
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2012, 15 (02) : 262 - 267
  • [36] Institute of Medicine. 2012. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Promoting Healthier Choices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
    McGuire, Shelley
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2012, 3 (03) : 332 - 333
  • [37] ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE FRONT-OF-PACKAGE (FOP) LABELING SYSTEMS IN GUIDING THE CONSUMERS' HEALTHY FOOD CHOICE
    Tarabella, Angela
    Voinea, Lelia
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2013, 15 (33) : 198 - 209
  • [38] The influence of front-of-package nutrition claims on food perceptions and purchase intentions among Nepali consumers
    Menger-Ogle, Andrew D.
    Graham, Dan J.
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2018, 66 : 160 - 170
  • [39] Toward a differentiated understanding of the effect of Nutri-Score nutrition labeling on healthier food choices
    Gassler, Birgit
    Faesel, Claudia K.
    Moeser, Anke
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2023, 39 (01) : 28 - 50
  • [40] Nutrition Label Viewing during a Food-Selection Task: Front-of-Package Labels vs Nutrition Facts Labels
    Graham, Dan. J.
    Heidrick, Charles
    Hodgin, Katie
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2015, 115 (10) : 1636 - 1646