Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure during versus after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
He, Fan [1 ]
Yang, Fuyu [1 ]
Tang, Chenglin [1 ]
Chen, Defei [1 ]
Zhao, Dongqin [1 ]
Xiong, Junjie [1 ]
Zou, Yu [1 ]
Huang, Guoquan [2 ]
Qian, Kun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Prov Key Lab Selenium Resources & Bioapplica, 158 Wuyang Ave, Enshi 445000, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; LOOP ILEOSTOMY; SURGERY; STOMA; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY; ANASTOMOSIS; COLOSTOMY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1155/2024/2410643
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Protective ileostomy can effectively prevent severe anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal timing for ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the safety and long-term outcomes of early ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy. Method. Patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery combined with protective ileostomy and adjuvant chemotherapy between April 2017 and April 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into an early closure group during chemotherapy (group A) and a late closure group after chemotherapy (group B). Results. A total of 215 patients were included in this study, with 115 in group A and 100 in group B. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. In group A, durations of stoma status ( p < 0.001 ) and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) ( p < 0.001 ) were shorter, and rectal stenosis ( p = 0.036 ) and stoma-related complications ( p = 0.007 ), especially stoma stenosis ( p = 0.041 ), were less common. However, compliance with chemotherapy was worse ( p = 0.009 ). There were no significant differences in operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, incidence and severity of LARS, disease-free survival, or overall survival between groups. Conclusion. Early ileostomy closure can effectively reduce the duration of stoma status, duration of LARS, rectal stenosis, and stoma-related complications while not affecting surgical complications and oncological outcomes. Ileostomy closure should not be delayed because of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, follow-up should be strengthened to increase compliance and integrity with chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early versus late closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis
    Li Wang
    Xinling Chen
    Chen Liao
    Qian Wu
    Hongliang Luo
    Fengming Yi
    Yiping Wei
    Wenxiong Zhang
    Surgery Today, 2021, 51 : 463 - 471
  • [22] Early versus late closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Li
    Chen, Xinling
    Liao, Chen
    Wu, Qian
    Luo, Hongliang
    Yi, Fengming
    Wei, Yiping
    Zhang, Wenxiong
    SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (04) : 463 - 471
  • [23] Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer
    Keane, C.
    Park, J.
    Oberg, S.
    Wedin, A.
    Bock, D.
    O'Grady, G.
    Bissett, I.
    Rosenberg, J.
    Angenete, E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (05) : 645 - 652
  • [24] Clostridium difficile infection after ileostomy closure and anastomotic failure in rectal cancer surgery patients
    Kim, Young Il
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Yang Soo
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Park, In Ja
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (02):
  • [25] Adjuvant chemotherapy no benefit in patients with rectal cancer
    Pinn, Stephen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2011, 72 (03) : 130 - 130
  • [26] Ileostomy versus colostomy: impact on functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Martellucci, Jacopo
    Balestri, Riccardo
    Brusciano, Luigi
    Iacopini, Veronica
    Puccini, Marco
    Docimo, Ludovico
    Cianchi, Fabio
    Buccianti, Piero
    Prosperi, Paolo
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (08) : 1686 - 1693
  • [27] Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
    Hui Ye
    Shujuan Huang
    Jie Yu
    Qichang Zhou
    Changlei Xi
    Longlei Cao
    Peiyun Wang
    Jie Shen
    Zhilin Gong
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [28] Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
    Ye, Hui
    Huang, Shujuan
    Yu, Jie
    Zhou, Qichang
    Xi, Changlei
    Cao, Longlei
    Wang, Peiyun
    Shen, Jie
    Gong, Zhilin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [29] Survival After Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Kim, Jin K.
    Marco, Michael R.
    Roxburgh, Campbell S. D.
    Chen, Chin-Tung
    Cercek, Andrea
    Strombom, Paul
    Temple, Larissa K. F.
    Nash, Garrett M.
    Guillem, Jose G.
    Paty, Philip B.
    Yaeger, Rona
    Stadler, Zsofia K.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Segal, Neil H.
    Reidy, Diane L.
    Varghese, Anna
    Shia, Jinru
    Vakiani, Efsevia
    Wu, Abraham J.
    Romesser, Paul B.
    Crane, Christopher H.
    Gollub, Marc J.
    Saltz, Leonard
    Smith, J. Joshua
    Weiser, Martin R.
    Patil, Sujata
    Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
    ONCOLOGIST, 2022, 27 (05): : 380 - 388
  • [30] Association of adjuvant chemotherapy with clinical outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Vickers, Michael M.
    Mercer, Jamison
    Kumar, Aalok
    Gresham, Gillian
    Goodwin, Rachel Anne
    Jiang, Maria
    Tang, Patricia A.
    Raissouni, Soundouss
    Powell, Erin Diana
    Hiller, Julie A. Price
    Monzon, Jose Gerard
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    Heng, Daniel Yick Chin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)