Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Neem Leaf Extract, Propolis, and Orange Oil when used as Endodontic Irrigants: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

被引:4
|
作者
Setia, Ria [1 ]
Bajaj, Nitika [1 ]
Bhola, Meenu [1 ]
Brar, Gurlal Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Dasmesh Inst Res & Dent Sci, Dept Pedodont & Prevent Dent, Faridkot, Punjab, India
关键词
Herbal; irrigation; neem leaf extract; orange oil; propolis; SEM; smear layer; ROOT-CANAL IRRIGANTS; AZADIRACHTA-INDICA;
D O I
10.4103/ccd.ccd_611_21
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: In root canal treatment, chemical debridement of the root canal with the help of irrigants is important due to the complex internal anatomy of the teeth. Biomechanical root canal preparation produces a smear layer. It covers the dentinal tubules, which may interfere with the penetration of various irrigants and intracanal medicaments, so the smear layer has to be removed. The potential side effects and certain limitations of chemical irrigants for smear layer removal have led to a shift toward herbal alternatives. Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the smear layer removal efficacy of Neem leaf extract, Propolis, and Orange oil as endodontic irrigants using the scanning electron microscope. Materials and Methods: Ninety samples were taken and then randomly (simple random sampling method) divided into three experimental groups (n = 30) depending upon different endodontic irrigants used: Group 1-Neem leaf extract, Group 2-Orange oil and Group 3-Propolis and smear layer removal evaluation was done under the scanning electron microscope Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at all the levels, i.e., coronal, middle, and apical. Results: The collected data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Group 1 (Neem leaf extract) showed the highest smear layer removal efficacy, which was followed by Group 2 (Orange oil) and the least efficacy of smear layer removal was shown by Group 3 (Propolis) at coronal, middle, and apical levels. Conclusion: Group 1 (Neem leaf extract) performed significantly better in removing the smear layer at coronal, middle, and apical levels as compared to the other two groups.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 134
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] Evaluation of canal cleanliness and smear layer removal after the use of the Quantec-E irrigation system and syringe: A comparative scanning electron microscope study
    Setlock, J
    Fayad, MI
    BeGole, E
    Bruzick, M
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2003, 96 (05): : 614 - 617
  • [32] Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy, Depth of Penetration into Dentinal Tubules and Effect on Microhardness of Root Dentin by Sodium Hypochlorite, Neem Extract and Gau Ark as a Root Canal Irrigants: An In-vitro Study
    Khade, Dhanshri Shashikant
    Shashikiran, N. D.
    Gugawad, Sachin
    Gaonkar, Namrata
    Taur, Swapnil
    Hadakar, Savita
    Mapark, Pooja N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (10)
  • [33] Evaluation of Root Dentin Thickness and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Two Novel Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments - An In Vitro Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
    Reddy, Gangili Sparsha
    Kalaiselvam, Rajeswari
    Rajakumaran, Arasappan
    Kuzhanchinathan, Manigandan
    Sabarish, Ram
    Ganesh, Arathi
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (06): : S1628 - S1632
  • [34] Comparative evaluation of 15% ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid plus cetavlon and 5% chlorine dioxide in removal of smear layer: A scanning electron microscope study
    Singh, Sandeep
    Arora, Vimal
    Majithia, Inderpal
    Dhiman, Rakesh Kumar
    Kumar, Dinesh
    ather, Amber
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2013, 4 (01) : 67 - 70
  • [35] A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study
    Charlie, K. M.
    Kuttappa, M. A.
    George, Liza
    Manoj, K. V.
    Joseph, Bobby
    John, Nishin K.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY, 2018, 8 (01): : 62 - 69
  • [36] A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Using Erbium:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation, Sonic Irrigation, and Manual Dynamic Irrigation: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study
    Thapak, Gourav
    Arya, Ashtha
    Grewal, Mandeep S.
    Arora, Anshul
    JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 12 : 1 - 6
  • [37] Comparison of removal of endodontic smear layer using ethylene glycol bis (beta-amino ethyl ether)-N, N, N', N'-tetraacetic acid and citric acid in primary teeth: A scanning electron microscopic study
    Hegde, Rahul J.
    Bapna, Kavita
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (02) : 216 - 220
  • [38] In-vitro efficacy of Er: YAG & Er,Cr: YSGG laser-activated irrigation with photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) irrigation for smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopy study
    Muhammad Abaza
    Tarek Harhash
    Lasers in Dental Science, 8 (1)