What is the future of nuclear power in Ukraine? The role of war, techno-economic drivers, and safety considerations

被引:1
|
作者
Chepeliev, Maksym [1 ]
Diachuk, Oleksandr [2 ]
Podolets, Roman [2 ]
Semeniuk, Andrii [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Ctr Global Trade Anal, Dept Agr Econ, 403 Mitch Daniels Blvd,KRAN 684, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Ukrainian Natl Acad Sci, Inst Econ & Forecasting, Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
Nuclear energy; Ukraine; Russian invasion; Greenhouse gas emissions; Climate mitigation; TIMES-Ukraine model; CLIMATE MITIGATION; COST; ENERGY; ELECTRICITY; INTEGRATION; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113612
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The TIMES-Ukraine energy system model is used to explore the future of nuclear power plants (NPPs) under an ambitious climate policy scenario, achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in 2050. Varying techno-economic (construction costs and capacity factors for NPPs, capital costs for solar and wind), policy (ban on construction or extension of NPPs), and macroeconomic (alternative economic recovery trajectories) factors are considered. The difference in the techno-economic assumptions for nuclear power generation has a very mod-erate impact on the total system costs (TSC) of the energy transition, as their variation (positive or negative change) does not exceed 0.1%-0.2% relative to the default case. Policy decisions on restricting nuclear power generation could have a more substantial impact, as TSC increase by 4-5 billion USD (0.6%-0.9%) over the 2020-2050 period under the most restrictive case. In terms of the economic viability of various NPPs, we find small modular reactors to be more competitive than large NPPs due to the higher availability factor. Overall, in terms of developing new NPP capacities, policymakers can consider alternative futures for this technology without major implications for the energy transition costs, as retired NPPs can be substituted by alternative generation technologies in a cost-competitive manner.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [31] Techno-economic analysis and dynamic performance evaluation of an integrated green concept based on concentrating solar power and a transportable heat pipe-cooled nuclear reactor
    Deng, Jiaolong
    Guan, Chaoran
    Sun, Yujie
    Liu, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Tengfei
    He, Hui
    Chai, Xiang
    ENERGY, 2024, 303
  • [32] Parameters analysis and techno-economic comparison of various ORCs and sCO2 cycles as the power cycle of Lead-Bismuth molten nuclear micro-reactor
    Zhang, Shijie
    Li, Liushuai
    Huo, Erguang
    Yu, Yujie
    Huang, Rui
    Wang, Shukun
    ENERGY, 2024, 295
  • [33] Thermo-economic assessment of flexible nuclear power plants in future low-carbon electricity systems: Role of thermal energy storage
    Aunedi, Marko
    Pantaleo, Antonio M. M.
    Strbac, Goran
    Markides, Christos N. N.
    Al Kindi, Abdullah A.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 258