Effects of wall cavity and fuel injection pressure on the performance of a non-reacting supersonic combustor

被引:0
|
作者
Talukder, Mahbub [1 ]
Mahian, Abu [1 ]
Aziz, Sarfaraz [1 ]
Ali, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Bangladesh Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
关键词
Scramjet; wall cavity; shock-shear layer interaction; mixing efficiency; total pressure recovery;
D O I
10.1177/14680874241233801
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study numerically investigates the flow field of a non-reacting cavity-configured scramjet (Supersonic Combustion Ramjet) combustor at various fuel injection pressures by solving the 2D Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, species transport equations, and Menter SST k-omega model. The aim of this research is to reveal the effects of wall cavity insertion and fuel injection pressure (FIP) on the crucial performance parameters i.e., fuel-air mixing efficiency (MxE), total pressure recovery (TPR), and mass-averaged Mach number (MAMN). Accordingly, two trapezoidal cavities of aspect ratio 7 are introduced on the opposite walls of a rectangular combustor. The combustor entrance is configured with rearward-facing steps and it intakes finite parallel air streams through finite-width inlets. Gaseous hydrogen jets are injected 30 mm downstream from the combustor entrance and 10 mm upstream from the cavity leading edge. FIP is varied according to the fuel-to-freestream pressure ratios (FFPR) of 4.5, 9.0, 13.5, and 18.0. The results of the cavity-configured combustor are then compared with the performance of the combustor in the absence of the wall cavities. The results delineate the change in flow structures with the inclusion of wall cavities and variation in FIP. Insight physics of mixing, total pressure loss, and MAMN in different regions of the combustor are studied and the results are quantified for comparison. MxE in a cavity-configured combustor does not monotonically increase with decreasing FFPR as found in the combustor without wall cavities. The shock-shear layer interactions (SSLIs) play a dominant role in mixing inside the cavity-configured combustor. The results also demonstrate that the insertion of wall cavities can increase fuel-air MxE through the formation of cavity recirculation zones. In the cavity-configured combustor, a maximum of 45% MxE is achieved for FFPR 4.5, which is 4% higher than the value obtained from the combustor without the cavities with an expense of 3% greater total pressure loss.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1381 / 1398
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of inflow velocity on transverse jet injection in a supersonic cavity combustor
    Zhang, Lin
    Cao, Yitao
    Liang, Jianhan
    Wang, Yi
    Sun, Mingbo
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2023, 35 (11)
  • [22] Influence of wall mounted ramps on DLR strut scramjet combustor under non-reacting flow field
    Antony Athithan, A.
    Jeyakumar, S.
    Poddar, Sandeep
    Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 56 : 3002 - 3008
  • [23] Numerical characterization of the non-reacting flow in a swirled gasturbine model combustor
    Widenhorn, A.
    Noll, B.
    Stoehr, M.
    Aigner, M.
    HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING '07, 2008, : 431 - 444
  • [24] Effect of wall cavity with combined fuel injection technique in scramjet combustor with CFD
    Verma, Kumari Ambe
    Pandey, Krishna Murari
    Sharma, Kaushal Kumar
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 45 : 6609 - 6614
  • [25] Comparison of scattering phase functions of reacting and non-reacting pulverised fuel particles
    Koch, M.
    Portnet, L.
    Gu, Y.
    Schiemann, M.
    Rohlfs, W.
    Kneer, R.
    FUEL, 2021, 287
  • [26] Visualizations of direct fuel injection effects in a supersonic cavity flameholder
    Sitaraman, Hariswaran
    Brunhart-Lupo, Nicholas
    de Frahan, Marc Henry
    Yellapantula, Shashank
    Perry, Bruce
    Rood, Jon
    Grout, Ray
    Day, Marc
    Binyahib, Roba
    Gruchalla, Kenny
    PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2021, 6 (11)
  • [27] Numerical study of non-reacting flowfields of a swirling trapped vortex ramjet combustor
    Chen, Song
    Zhao, Dan
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 74 : 81 - 92
  • [28] Performance analysis of a vortex chamber under non-reacting and reacting conditions
    T N Rajesh
    T J S Jothi
    T Jayachandran
    Sādhanā, 2020, 45
  • [29] Direct numerical simulation on supersonic turbulent reacting and non-reacting spray jet in heated coflow
    Jin, Tai
    Luo, Kun
    Dai, Qi
    Fan, Jianren
    FUEL, 2016, 164 : 267 - 276
  • [30] Study of a non-reacting hypersonic flow over an external cavity with flow injection using DSMC method
    Lekzian, E.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 140