Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen as Adjunct to Native Tissue Vaginal Apical Prolapse Repair A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:6
|
作者
Rahn, David D. [1 ]
Richter, Holly E. [2 ]
Sung, Vivian W. [3 ]
Pruszynski, Jessica E. [1 ]
Hynan, Linda S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SouthWestern Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI USA
[4] Univ Texas SouthWestern Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Peter O Donnell Jr Sch Publ Hlth, Dallas, TX USA
来源
关键词
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; LOCAL ESTROGEN; RECURRENCE; RISK; QUESTIONNAIRES; SURGERY; QUALITY; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2023.12317
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Surgical repairs of apical/uterovaginal prolapse are commonly performed using native tissue pelvic ligaments as the point of attachment for the vaginal cuff after a hysterectomy. Clinicians may recommend vaginal estrogen in an effort to reduce prolapse recurrence, but the effects of intravaginal estrogen on surgical prolapse management are uncertain. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of perioperative vaginal estrogen vs placebo cream on prolapse recurrence following native tissue surgical prolapse repair. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized superiority clinical trialwas conducted at 3 tertiary US clinical sites (Texas, Alabama, Rhode Island). Postmenopausal women (N = 206) with bothersome anterior and apical vaginal prolapse interested in surgical repair were enrolled in urogynecology clinics between December 2016 and February 2020. INTERVENTIONS The intervention was 1 g of conjugated estrogen cream (0.625mg/g) or placebo, inserted vaginally nightly for 2 weeks and then twice weekly to complete at least 5 weeks of application preoperatively; this continued twice weekly for 12 months postoperatively. Participants underwent a vaginal hysterectomy (if uterus present) and standardized apical fixation (either uterosacral or sacrospinous ligament fixation). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas time to failure of prolapse repair by 12 months after surgery defined by at least 1 of the following 3 outcomes: anatomical/objective prolapse of the anterior or posterior walls beyond the hymen or the apex descending more than one-third of the vaginal length, subjective vaginal bulge symptoms, or repeated prolapse treatment. Secondary outcomes included measures of urinary and sexual function, symptoms and signs of urogenital atrophy, and adverse events. RESULTS Of 206 postmenopausal women, 199 were randomized and 186 underwent surgery. The mean (SD) age of participants was 65 (6.7) years. The primary outcome was not significantly different for women receiving vaginal estrogen vs placebo through 12 months: 12-month failure incidence of 19% (n = 20) for vaginal estrogen vs 9% (n = 10) for placebo (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.97 [95% CI, 0.92-4.22]), with the anatomic recurrence component being most common, rather than vaginal bulge symptoms or prolapse repeated treatment. Masked surgeon assessment of vaginal tissue quality and estrogenization was significantly better in the vaginal estrogen group at the time of the operation. In the subset of participants with at least moderately bothersome vaginal atrophy symptoms at baseline (n = 109), the vaginal atrophy score for most bothersome symptom was significantly better at 12 months with vaginal estrogen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Adjunctive perioperative vaginal estrogen application did not improve surgical success rates after native tissue transvaginal prolapse repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02431897
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 625
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advanced utero-vaginal prolapse and vaginal vault suspension: synthetic mesh vs native tissue repair
    Cosma, Stefano
    Menato, Guido
    Preti, Mario
    Petruzzelli, Paolo
    Tin, Michela Chiado Fiorio
    Riboni, Francesca
    Benedetto, Chiara
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 289 (05) : 1053 - 1060
  • [42] Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial
    Alfredo L. Milani
    Anne Damoiseaux
    Joanna IntHout
    Kirsten B. Kluivers
    Mariella I. J. Withagen
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2018, 29 : 847 - 858
  • [43] Advanced utero-vaginal prolapse and vaginal vault suspension: synthetic mesh vs native tissue repair
    Stefano Cosma
    Guido Menato
    Mario Preti
    Paolo Petruzzelli
    Michela Chiadò Fiorio Tin
    Francesca Riboni
    Chiara Benedetto
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014, 289 : 1053 - 1060
  • [44] Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse
    Funk, Michele Jonsson
    Visco, Anthony G.
    Weidner, Alison C.
    Pate, Virginia
    Wu, Jennifer M.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (08) : 1279 - 1285
  • [45] Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse
    Michele Jonsson Funk
    Anthony G. Visco
    Alison C. Weidner
    Virginia Pate
    Jennifer M. Wu
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013, 24 : 1279 - 1285
  • [46] Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial
    Milani, Alfredo L.
    Damoiseaux, Anne
    IntHout, Joanna
    Kluivers, Kirsten B.
    Withagen, Mariella I. J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (06) : 847 - 858
  • [47] Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse treatment: 5 years follow-up
    dos Reis Brandao da Silveira, S.
    Pedro Auge, A.
    Ilona Katalin de Jarmy-Di Bella, Z.
    Nastri, F.
    Francisco Ramos Margarido, P.
    Silva Carramao, S.
    Alves Rodrigues, C.
    Chada Baracat, E.
    Milhem Haddad, J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 : S99 - S100
  • [48] IMPACT OF PREOPERATIVE VAGINAL ESTROGEN USE ON PERCEIVED SURGICAL COMPLEXITY OF VAGINAL PROLAPSE REPAIR
    Romanova, A. L.
    Giugale, L. E.
    Lopa, S.
    Ackenbom, M. F.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S258 - S258
  • [50] Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Iglesia, Cheryl B.
    Sokol, Andrew I.
    Sokol, Eric R.
    Kudish, Bela I.
    Gutman, Robert E.
    Peterson, Joanna L.
    Shott, Susan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (02): : 293 - 303