Distinguishing Brain Metastasis Progression From Radiation Effects After Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using Longitudinal GRASP Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

被引:2
|
作者
Berger, Assaf [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Matthew D. [2 ]
Lotan, Eyal [2 ]
Block, Kai Tobias [2 ]
Fatterpekar, Girish [2 ]
Kondziolka, Douglas [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, NYU Langone Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU, NYU Langone Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[3] NYU, NYU Langone Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Radiosurg, 530 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Brain metastases; Radiation necrosis; Stereotactic radiosurgery; MRI; TUMOR RECURRENCE; NECROSIS; INJURY; RADIONECROSIS;
D O I
10.1227/neu.0000000000002228
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND:Differentiating brain metastasis progression from radiation effects or radiation necrosis (RN) remains challenging. Golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI provides high spatial and temporal resolution to analyze tissue enhancement, which may differ between tumor progression (TP) and RN.OBJECTIVE:To investigate the utility of longitudinal GRASP MRI in distinguishing TP from RN after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).METHODS:We retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with brain metastasis managed with SRS at our institution from 2013 to 2020 who had GRASP MRI before and at least once after SRS. TP (n = 16) was pathologically confirmed. RN (n = 16) was diagnosed on either resected tissue without evidence of tumor or on lesion resolution on follow-up. As a reference, we included a separate group of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer that showed favorable response with tumor control and without RN on subsequent imaging (n = 16). Mean contrast washin and washout slopes normalized to the superior sagittal sinus were compared between groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine diagnostic performance.RESULTS:After SRS, progression showed a significantly steeper washin slope than RN on all 3 follow-up scans (scan 1: 0.29 +/- 0.16 vs 0.18 +/- 0.08, P = .021; scan 2: 0.35 +/- 0.19 vs 0.18 +/- 0.09, P = .004; scan 3: 0.32 +/- 0.12 vs 0.17 +/- 0.07, P = .002). No significant differences were found in the post-SRS washout slope. Post-SRS washin slope differentiated progression and RN with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, a sensitivity of 75%, and a specificity of 69% on scan 1; an AUC of 0.85, a sensitivity of 92%, and a specificity of 69% on scan 2; and an AUC of 0.87, a sensitivity of 63%, and a specificity of 100% on scan 3.CONCLUSION:Longitudinal GRASP MRI may help to differentiate metastasis progression from RN.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 506
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiparametric analysis from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI to evaluate malignant brain tumors
    Abreu, Vasco Sousa
    Tarrio, Joao
    Silva, Jose
    Almeida, Francisco
    Pinto, Catarina
    Freitas, Davide
    Filipe, Joao Pedro
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2024, 34 (02) : 257 - 266
  • [42] Distinguishing Recurrent Intra-Axial Metastatic Tumor from Radiation Necrosis Following Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Using Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging
    Barajas, R. F.
    Chang, J. S.
    Sneed, P. K.
    Segal, M. R.
    McDermott, M. W.
    Cha, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2009, 30 (02) : 367 - 372
  • [43] Comment on Hatzoglou et al: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion versus 18FDG PET/CT in differentiating brain tumor progression from radiation injury
    Cicone, Francesco
    Galldiks, Norbert
    Minniti, Giuseppe
    Filss, Christian P.
    Scopinaro, Francesco
    Prior, John O.
    Albert, Nathalie L.
    Langen, Karl-Josef
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 (02) : 300 - 301
  • [44] A Feasibility Study of the Utility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Treatment Planning and Monitoring Treatment Response in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Lewis, J.
    Mamata, H.
    Tokuda, J.
    Mishra, P.
    Hermann, G.
    Hatabu, H.
    Nishino, M.
    Mak, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [45] External Validation Of A Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Model For Distinguishing Radiation Necrosis From Progression Of Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Chen, X.
    Parekh, V.
    Peng, L.
    Chan, M. D.
    Soike, M.
    McTyre, E.
    Jacobs, M. A.
    Kleinberg, L. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E722 - E723
  • [46] Assessment of blood-brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review
    Heye, Anna K.
    Culling, Ross D.
    Valdes Hernandez, Maria del C.
    Thrippleton, Michael J.
    Wardlaw, Joanna M.
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2014, 6 : 262 - 274
  • [47] Preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer by radiomic signatures from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Liu, Chunling
    Ding, Jie
    Spuhler, Karl
    Gao, Yi
    Sosa, Mario Serrano
    Moriarty, Meghan
    Hussain, Shahid
    He, Xiang
    Liang, Changhong
    Huang, Chuan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (01) : 131 - 140
  • [48] Analysis of parametric histogram from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in evaluating brain tumor response to radiotherapy
    Peng, Shin-Lei
    Chen, Chih-Feng
    Liu, Ho-Ling
    Lui, Chun-Chung
    Huang, Yu-Jie
    Lee, Tsung-Han
    Chang, Chiung-Chih
    Wang, Fu-Nien
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2013, 26 (04) : 443 - 450
  • [49] Differentiation of Hemangioblastoma from Metastatic Brain Tumor using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    J. Cha
    S. T. Kim
    D.-H. Nam
    D-S. Kong
    H.-J. Kim
    Y. K. Kim
    H. Y. Kim
    G. M. Park
    P. Jeon
    K. H. Kim
    H. S. Byun
    Clinical Neuroradiology, 2017, 27 : 329 - 334
  • [50] Differentiation of Hemangioblastoma from Metastatic Brain Tumor using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Cha, J.
    Kim, S. T.
    Nam, D. -H.
    Kong, D-S.
    Kim, H. -J.
    Kim, Y. K.
    Kim, H. Y.
    Park, G. M.
    Jeon, P.
    Kim, K. H.
    Byun, H. S.
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 329 - 334