Serial entrepreneurs: A review of literature and guidance for future research

被引:41
|
作者
Dabic, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Vlacic, Bozidar [3 ,4 ]
Kiessling, Timothy [5 ]
Caputo, Andrea [6 ,7 ]
Pellegrini, Massimiliano [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Econ & Business, JF Kennedy Sq 6, Zagreb 1000, Croatia
[2] Nottingham Trent Univ, Nottingham Business Sch, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Catolica Portuguesa, Catolica Porto Business Sch, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Catolica Portuguesa, Res Ctr Management & Econ CEGE, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Sabanci Univ, Sabanci Business Sch, Istanbul, Turkey
[6] Univ Trento, Dept Econ & Management, Trento, Italy
[7] Univ Lincoln, Lincoln Int Business Sch, Dept Management, Lincoln, England
[8] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Management & Law, Rome, Italy
关键词
Serial entrepreneur; habitual entrepreneur; systematic literature review; multiple correspondence analysis; HOMALS; OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION; HABITUAL ENTREPRENEURS; STRATEGIC AGILITY; BUSINESS FAILURE; EXPERIENCE; FOUNDERS; NOVICE; IMPACT; EXIT; PORTFOLIO;
D O I
10.1080/00472778.2021.1969657
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Little research has been conducted regarding serial entrepreneurship compared to entrepreneurship research more broadly, despite research that suggests that as many as 50% of all entrepreneurs are serial entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship research shows that most new ventures fail, yet serial entrepreneurs continually exit previous ventures and start new ones. Our study explores 118 scholarly articles indexed in Web of Science and Scopus databases on serial entrepreneurship through multiple correspondence analysis. Through our analysis, we identify key areas for future research, explore and consolidate the theoretical foundations used, and provide a review of academic literature for future researchers to utilize. Our perceptual map has identified four key research areas that researchers should focus upon: heuristics in entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial capabilities, the entrepreneurial ecosystem, and technological development and resources.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1142
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sharing economy: a review of the literature and a framework for future research
    Wang, Xuequn
    Lin, Xiaolin
    Abdullat, Amjad
    VINE JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (03) : 418 - 437
  • [42] Literature Review of Clergy Resilience and Recommendations for Future Research
    Sielaff, Andrea M.
    Davis, Kate Rae
    McNeil, J. Derek
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND THEOLOGY, 2021, 49 (04) : 308 - 323
  • [43] Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research
    Schilpzand, Pauline
    de Pater, Irene E.
    Erez, Amir
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2016, 37 : S57 - S88
  • [44] Airbnb phenomenon: a review of literature and future research directions
    Negi, Garima
    Tripathi, Smita
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM INSIGHTS, 2023, 6 (05) : 1909 - 1925
  • [45] Pedestrian falls: A review of the literature and future research directions
    Schepers, Paul
    den Brinker, Berry
    Methorst, Rob
    Helbich, Marco
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2017, 62 : 227 - 234
  • [46] Deepfakes: An Integrative Review of the Literature and an Agenda for Future Research
    Vasist, Pramukh Nanjundaswamy
    Krishnan, Satish
    Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2022, 51 (01): : 556 - 602
  • [47] Brand hate: a literature review and future research agenda
    Aziz, Rahila
    Rahman, Zillur
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2022, 56 (07) : 2014 - 2051
  • [48] A structured literature review and suggestions for future effectuation research
    Gregoire, Denis A.
    Cherchem, Naima
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 54 (03) : 621 - 639
  • [49] Active fixturing: literature review and future research directions
    Bakker, O. J.
    Papastathis, T. N.
    Popov, A. A.
    Ratchev, S. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (11) : 3171 - 3190
  • [50] Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research
    Giles, DC
    MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 4 (03) : 279 - 304