Seismic fragility analysis of rocking buckling-resistant braced structures subjected to far-field and near-field ground motions

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Guowei [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Yongkun [1 ,2 ]
Song, Jincheng [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Chang'an [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Beijing Higher Inst Engn Res Ctr Civil Engn Struct, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Multifunct Shaking Tables Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rocking structure; Buckling-resistant braces; Near -field and far -field ground motion; Incremental dynamic analysis; Seismic fragility; Collapse reserve factor; RESTRAINED BRACES; STEEL FRAME; PERFORMANCE; FAULT;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105471
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To address the inadequate seismic performance of traditional buckling-restrained braced frame structures (BRBFS), this study introduces a novel structure, the rocking buckling-restrained braced frame structure (RBRBFS). The RBRBFS achieves effective control of main structure damage and enhances structural energy dissipation and seismic resilience by disconnecting the column feet from the foundation in the BRBFS and using friction energy dissipation devices as rocking column feet. This research aims to quantitatively assess the seismic performance and collapse safety margin of the new RBRBFS under different types of ground motions. To achieve this goal, two eight-story structures, one is traditional BRBFS and the other is RBRBFS, were designed. Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) was employed, accounting for ground motion uncertainty, to conduct a comparative study of the seismic fragility of both structures subjected to near-fault pulse-like and far-field earthquake ground motions. Nonlinear dynamic analysis results indicate that under high-intensity ground motions, the RBRBFS significantly improves structural ductility and effectively controls structural damage. Compared to BRBF structures, the BRBFS exhibit a reduction of 26.5% and 18.3% in damage probability deviation under the two seismic excitations, highlighting their more stable structural response under varying seismic conditions. Furthermore, this novel RBRBFS increases the collapse margin ratio by 25% to 30%, demonstrating its higher seismic collapse resistance capacity
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On seismic demand of near-field ground motions
    Hemant Shrivastava
    Shashank Pathak
    Sādhanā, 49
  • [32] NEAR-FIELD AND FAR-FIELD SEISMIC EVIDENCES FOR TRIGGERING OF AN EARTHQUAKE
    AKI, K
    REASENBE.P
    DEFAZIO, T
    TSAI, YB
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1969, 50 (04): : 253 - &
  • [33] Assessments on seismic performance of self-centering hybrid damping systems under far-field and near-field ground motions
    Li, Junlin
    Wang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2022, 192
  • [34] Seismic Evaluation of Horizontally Curved Bridges Subjected to Near-Field Ground Motions
    Minavand, Mahmood
    Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 16 (02)
  • [35] Earthquake-induced loss assessment of steel dual concentrically braced structures subjected to near-field ground motions
    Khademi, Mohsen
    Tehranizadeh, Mohsen
    Shirkhani, Amir
    Hajirasouliha, Iman
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 51 : 1123 - 1139
  • [36] SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MASONRY BUILDING SUBJECTED TO NEAR AND FAR FIELD GROUND MOTIONS
    Saygili, Ozden
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-STAVEBNI OBZOR, 2020, 29 (03): : 280 - 292
  • [37] Seismic Response Analysis of a Curved Bridge under Near-Fault and Far-Field Ground Motions
    Su, Peng
    Zhu, Xiaoyi
    Chen, Yanjiang
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Bing
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (16):
  • [38] Seismic vulnerability of shallow tunnels subjected to far-field long-period ground motions
    Cabangon, Lowell Tan
    Elia, Gaetano
    Rouainia, Mohamed
    Keawsawasvong, Suraparb
    Ornthammarath, Teraphan
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 176
  • [39] Fragility Analysis of Retrofitted Multicolumn Bridge Bent Subjected to Near-Fault and Far-Field Ground Motion
    Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir
    Alam, M. Shahria
    Bhuiyan, M. A. Rahman
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2013, 18 (10) : 992 - 1004
  • [40] Three-Dimensional Wharf Response to Far-Field and Impulsive Near-Field Ground Motions in Liquefiable Soils
    Shafieezadeh, Abdollah
    DesRoches, Reginald
    Rix, Glenn J.
    Werner, Stuart D.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (08) : 1395 - 1407