AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing

被引:20
|
作者
Semrl, N. [1 ]
Feigl, S. [1 ]
Taumberger, N. [1 ,3 ]
Bracic, T. [1 ]
Fluhr, H. [1 ]
Blockeel, C. [2 ]
Kollmann, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel UZ Brussel, Ctr Reprod Med, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Med Univ Graz, Auenbrugger pl 14, A-8036 Graz, Austria
关键词
artificial intelligence; language models; ChatGPT; academic writing; reproductive medicine;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dead207
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven language models have the potential to serve as an educational tool, facilitate clinical decision-making, and support research and academic writing. The benefits of their use are yet to be evaluated and concerns have been raised regarding the accuracy, transparency, and ethical implications of using this AI technology in academic publishing. At the moment, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is one of the most powerful and widely debated AI language models. Here, we discuss its feasibility to answer scientific questions, identify relevant literature, and assist writing in the field of human reproduction. With consideration of the scarcity of data on this topic, we assessed the feasibility of ChatGPT in academic writing, using data from six meta-analyses published in a leading journal of human reproduction. The text generated by ChatGPT was evaluated and compared to the original text by blinded reviewers. While ChatGPT can produce high-quality text and summarize information efficiently, its current ability to interpret data and answer scientific questions is limited, and it cannot be relied upon for a literature search or accurate source citation due to the potential spread of incomplete or false information. We advocate for open discussions within the reproductive medicine research community to explore the advantages and disadvantages of implementing this AI technology. Researchers and reviewers should be informed about AI language models, and we encourage authors to transparently disclose their use.
引用
收藏
页码:2281 / 2288
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring the potential and limitations of ChatGPT for academic peer-reviewed writing: Addressing linguistic injustice and ethical concerns
    Tail, Andy Man Yeung
    Meyer, Maximilian
    Varidel, Mathew
    Prodan, Ante
    Vogel, Marc
    Lorfino, Frank
    Krausz, Reinhard Michael
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND LEARNING, 2023, 17 (01): : T16 - T30
  • [22] Advancing Students' Academic Excellence in Distance Education: Exploring the Potential of Generative AI Integration to Improve Academic Writing Skills
    Maphoto, Kgabo bridget
    Sevnarayan, Kershnee
    Mohale, Ntshimane elphas
    Suliman, Zuleika
    Ntsopi, Tumelo jacquiline
    Mokoena, Douglas
    OPEN PRAXIS, 2024, 16 (02): : 142 - 159
  • [23] EXPLORING THE LANDSCAPE OF GENERATIVE AI AND LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS IN ALZHEIMER AND DEMENTIAS RESEARCH
    Wei, Duo
    Elmasri, Jeannine
    Hernandez, Bianca
    Goyal, Riya
    Burdick, David
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2024, 8 : 1112 - 1113
  • [24] ChatGPT: "To be or not to be"... in academic research. The human mind's analytical rigor and capacity to discriminate between AI bots' truths and hallucinations
    Anghelescu, Aurelian
    Ciobanu, Ilinca
    Munteanu, Constantin
    Anghelescu, Lucia Ana Maria
    Onose, Gelu
    BALNEO AND PRM RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2023, 14 (04):
  • [25] Clinical Research With Large Language Models Generated Writing-Clinical Research with AI-assisted Writing (CRAW) Study
    Huespe, Ivan A.
    Echeverri, Jorge
    Khalid, Aisha
    Bisso, Indalecio Carboni
    Musso, Carlos G.
    Surani, Salim
    Bansal, Vikas
    Kashyap, Rahul
    CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2023, 5 (10) : E0975
  • [26] Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT in Nursing Education: A Comparative Analysis of Human and AI-Generated NCLEX Questions
    Cox, Rachel
    Hunt, Karen
    Hill, Rebecca
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2024, 73 (03) : E75 - E75
  • [27] CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities
    Lee, Mina
    Liang, Percy
    Yang, Qian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI' 22), 2022,
  • [28] Artificial Intelligence Language Models and the Future of Academic Research in Surgery Exploring Opportunities and Concerns
    Ojeda, Luis Alejandro Morales
    Montero, Stefania
    Mehta, Aashna
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 93 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [29] Translating classical Arabic verse: human translation vs. AI large language models (Gemini and ChatGPT)
    Farghal, Mohammed
    Haider, Ahmad S.
    COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [30] Exploring the boundaries of authorship: a comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature
    Amirjalili, Forough
    Neysani, Masoud
    Nikbakht, Ahmadreza
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9