Professional Social Media in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Usage, Resources, and Barriers

被引:4
|
作者
Landeen, Kelly C. [1 ]
Smetak, Miriam R. [1 ]
Keah, Niobra M. [2 ]
Davis, Seth J. [3 ]
Shastri, Karthik [4 ]
Patel, Priyesh [4 ]
Stephan, Scott J. [5 ]
Yang, Shiayin F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Med Ctr, 1215 21st Ave S,Ste 7209, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Ctr Bone Biol, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Hlth, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Div Facial Plast Surg, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Northwestern Med, Div Facial Plast Surg, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Div Facial Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
关键词
facial plastic surgery; social media; private practice; patient access;
D O I
10.1177/00034894221133746
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Social media is an important tool for networking, recruitment, and promoting clinical practice. No study has specifically assessed which FPRS practitioners have professional social media accounts, how they utilize them, and what barriers or resources exist to their use. Objectives: This study aims to examine differences in social media use based on provider demographics and practice setting, and identify resources and barriers to professional social media use. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis was an anonymous survey sent to AAFPRS members. Data collected included demographics, practice setting, resources, and barriers encountered to use of professional social media. Results: Most facial plastic surgeons (80%) use professional social media, notably Instagram and Facebook, and mostly post patient photos and stories (67.9%). Social media is more commonly utilized in private practice (56% vs 23%, P = .0016), where there are less institutional barriers (10% vs 40%, P = .02) and more resources available (82.5% vs 12.5%, P = .01). Conclusions: Social media is widely used in FPRS. Working in private practice is associated with increased availability of resources for support, and a reduction in institutional barriers to maintaining a social media presence. With this understanding, facial plastic surgeons can be better equipped for networking, marketing, and promoting the field of FPRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1089
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Titanium Exposure Outcome in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    Pigatto, Paolo D.
    Guastella, Claudio
    Guzzi, Gianpaolo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (01) : 310E - 310E
  • [23] EVALUATION OF SCLERA AS A HOMOGRAFT IN FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
    MICHEL, RG
    PATTERSON, CN
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1978, 86 (02): : 206 - 214
  • [24] Mandibular body bone in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery
    Li, KK
    Schwartz, HC
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1996, 106 (04): : 504 - 506
  • [25] Telelecture Educational Series in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    Hakimi, Amir A.
    Dunn, Brandyn S.
    Sharma, Giriraj K.
    Bhandarkar, Naveen D.
    Wong, Brian J-F
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 36 (02) : 211 - 214
  • [26] Plastic-reconstructive facial surgery - Fundamentals III
    Rettinger, G.
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2007, 86 (11) : 823 - 830
  • [27] Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Our International Future
    Adamson, Peter A.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 37 (05) : 688 - 689
  • [28] THE IDEAL TISSUE ADHESIVE IN FACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
    ELLIS, DAF
    SHAIKH, A
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1990, 19 (01): : 68 - 72
  • [29] Regenerative Medicine in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery A Review
    Miller, Matthew Q.
    Dighe, Abhijit
    Cui, Quanjun
    Park, Stephen S.
    Christophel, J. Jared
    JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 18 (05) : 391 - 394
  • [30] Social Media Marketing in Facial Plastic Surgery What Has Worked?
    Nayak, Laxmeesh Mike
    Linkov, Gary
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 27 (03) : 373 - +