Quantifying predictive uncertainty in damage classification for nondestructive evaluation using Bayesian approximation and deep learning

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Zi [1 ]
Deng, Yiming [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
uncertainty quantification; magnetic flux leakage; inverse NDE; Bayesian approximation; deep learning; FLUX LEAKAGE SIGNALS; QUANTIFICATION; RECONSTRUCTION; PROPAGATION; CRACKS; SIMULATION; INVERSION; PARAMETER; ENSEMBLE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6420/ad2f63
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Magnetic flux leakage (MFL), a widely used nondestructive evaluation (NDE) method, for inspecting pipelines to prevent potential long-term failures. However, during field testing, uncertainties can affect the accuracy of the inspection and the decision-making process regarding damage conditions. Therefore, it is essential to identify and quantify these uncertainties to ensure the reliability of the inspection. This study focuses on the uncertainties that arise during the inverse NDE process due to the dynamic magnetization process, which is affected by the relative motion of the MFL sensor and the material being tested. Specifically, the study investigates the uncertainties caused by sensing liftoff, which can affect the output signal of the sensing system. Due to the complexity of describing the forward uncertainty propagation process, this study compared two typical machine learning (ML)-based approximate Bayesian inference methods, convolutional neural network and deep ensemble, to address the input uncertainty from the MFL response data. Besides, an autoencoder method is applied to tackle the lack of experimental data for the training model by augmenting the dataset, which is constructed with the pre-trained model based on transfer learning. Prior knowledge learned from large simulated MFL signals can fine-tune the autoencoder model which enhances the subsequent learning process on experimental MFL data with faster generalization. The augmented data from the fine-tuned autoencoder is further applied for ML-based defect size classification. This study conducted prediction accuracy and uncertainty analysis with calibration, which can evaluate the prediction performance and reveal the relation between the liftoff uncertainty and prediction accuracy. Further, to strengthen the trustworthiness of the prediction results, the decision-making process guided by uncertainty is applied to provide valuable insights into the reliability of the final prediction results. Overall, the proposed framework for uncertainty quantification offers valuable insights into the assessment of reliability in MFL-based decision-making and inverse problems.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty in Bayesian deep label distribution learning
    Zheng, Rui
    Zhang, Shulin
    Liu, Lei
    Luo, Yuhao
    Sun, Mingzhai
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 101
  • [22] Quantifying Uncertainty of Portfolios using Bayesian Neural Networks
    Esener, Suleyman
    Wegner, Enrico
    Almeida, Rui Jorge
    Basturk, Nalan
    Rodrigues, Paulo
    2024 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, IJCNN 2024, 2024,
  • [23] Quantifying uncertainty in predictions using a Bayesian neural network
    Goh, ATC
    Chua, CG
    COMPUTATIONAL FLUID AND SOLID MECHANICS 2003, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 292 - 294
  • [24] Lognormal approximation for quantifying performance of Bayesian target classifier in presence of pose uncertainty
    Irving, WW
    Washburn, RB
    Tenney, RR
    ALGORITHMS FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY III, 1996, 2757 : 271 - 278
  • [25] Graph Posterior Network: Bayesian Predictive Uncertainty for Node Classification
    Stadler, Maximilian
    Charpentier, Bertrand
    Geisler, Simon
    Zuegner, Daniel
    Guennemann, Stephan
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 34 (NEURIPS 2021), 2021, 34
  • [26] Quantifying Uncertainty in Environmental Sensing with Evidential Deep Learning
    Mittermaier, Simon
    Patra, Subhankar
    Carbonelli, Cecilia
    2023 IEEE SENSORS, 2023,
  • [27] Uncertainty quantification in skin cancer classification using three-way decision-based Bayesian deep learning
    Abdar, Moloud
    Samami, Maryam
    Mahmoodabad, Sajjad Dehghani
    Doan, Thang
    Mazoure, Bogdan
    Hashemifesharaki, Reza
    Liu, Li
    Khosravi, Abbas
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    Makarenkov, Vladimir
    Nahavandi, Saeid
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 135
  • [28] Quantifying Uncertainty of Deep Neural Networks in Skin Lesion Classification
    Van Molle, Pieter
    Verbelen, Tim
    De Boom, Cedric
    Vankeirsbilck, Bert
    De Vylder, Jonas
    Diricx, Bart
    Kimpe, Tom
    Simoens, Pieter
    Dhoedt, Bart
    UNCERTAINTY FOR SAFE UTILIZATION OF MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING AND CLINICAL IMAGE-BASED PROCEDURES, 2019, 11840 : 52 - 61
  • [29] Quantifying predictive uncertainty of streamflow forecasts based on a Bayesian joint probability model
    Zhao, Tongtiegang
    Wang, Q. J.
    Bennett, James C.
    Robertson, David E.
    Shao, Quanxi
    Zhao, Jianshi
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 528 : 329 - 340
  • [30] Uncertainty Quantification in Classifying Complex Geological Facies Using Bayesian Deep Learning
    Hossain, Touhid Mohammad
    Hermana, Maman
    Jaya, Makky Sandra
    Sakai, Hiroshi
    Abdulkadir, Said Jadid
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 113767 - 113777