Different Concentrations of Chemical Topping Agents Affect Cotton Yield and Quality by Regulating Plant Architecture

被引:4
|
作者
Wu, Yanqin [1 ]
Tang, Jiyuan [1 ]
Tian, Jingshan [1 ]
Du, Mingwei [2 ]
Gou, Ling [1 ]
Zhang, Yali [1 ]
Zhang, Wangfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shihezi Univ, Coll Agron, Key Lab Oasis Ecoagr, Xinjiang Prod & Construction Corps, Shihezi 832003, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
cotton; chemical topping; yield; plant architecture; concentration; MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE; UPLAND COTTON; EVOLUTION; GROWTH; DENSITY;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy13071741
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Manual removal of the main stem tips of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a traditional topping approach in China. However, chemical topping has become an inevitable trend. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the effect and appropriate concentration of agents for advancement of cotton whole process mechanization management technology. A two-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different methods of topping on cotton yield and plant architecture in Shihezi, Xinjiang, China. Plant topping included manual topping, non-topping as the control, and chemical topping (high, medium, and low concentrations of topping agent) to determine a suitable topping method and topping agent concentration for machine-picked cotton. Chemical topping was performed using fortified mepiquat chloride (DPC+). Chemical topping and manual topping increased seed cotton yield compared with non-topping. Compared with non-topping, high, medium, and low concentrations of topping agent significantly increased the yield by 19.5-27.9%, 24.1-29.4%, and 24.3-28.4%, respectively. Topping treatment mainly regulated yield and total boll number per unit area by affecting the boll number per plant and had a certain positive effect on fiber strength but no significant effect on boll weight. Chemical topping affected both vertical and horizontal plant architecture characteristics of cotton; the plant height of low-, medium-, and high-concentration treatments increased by 7.2-11.4 cm, 4.0-5.7 cm, and 2.3-4.4 cm, respectively, compared with manual topping and decreased by 5.1-7.8 cm, 8.3-13.5 cm, and 9.4-16.9 cm, respectively, compared with non-topping. The number of main stem internodes was significantly different between high- and low-concentration treatments, which showed that the higher the concentration, the lower the number of the main stem internodes. Chemical topping controlled the increase in the length of the upper branches, the higher the concentration, the lower the increase in the length of the upper fruit branch. Compared with non-topping, the medium concentration of topping agent controlled the number of fruit branches, similar to manual topping. The role of upper internode length of cotton cannot be ignored under chemical topping. The peak leaf area index (LAI) of medium- and high-concentration treatments was delayed for 1 week in the late growth period (after topping for 28 d) compared with manual topping. The LAI values were high, and the duration of high values was prolonged. The optimal chemical topping agent was the medium concentration.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of Waterlogging Duration at Different Growth Stages on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Cotton
    Wang, Xiaosen
    Deng, Zhong
    Zhang, Wenzheng
    Meng, Zhaojiang
    Chang, Xiao
    Lv, Mouchao
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [42] Optical characteristics, growth and yield quality of cotton under different growing environments
    Kumar, Sagar
    Niwas, Ram
    Khichar, M. L.
    Premdeep
    Singh, Amit
    Kumar, Yogesh
    MAUSAM, 2018, 69 (03): : 465 - 472
  • [43] Sugarcane as a Forage Plant: Structural and Chemical Traits that Affect Fiber Quality
    Rodrigues Marques, Joao Paulo
    Aferri, Gabriela
    Montanha, Gabriel Sgabieiro
    Perassolo Guedes, Fernanda Trilstz
    Soares, Marli Misaki
    Muniz, Larissa Fernando
    Tomazello Filho, Mario
    Xavier, Mauro Alexandre
    Pereira de Carvalho, Hudson Wallace
    BIORESOURCES, 2021, 16 (04) : 7622 - 7633
  • [44] Crop load and canopy architecture affect yield and fruit quality of 'Golden May' apricot
    O'Connell, M. G.
    XII INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATING CANOPY, ROOTSTOCK AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY IN ORCHARD SYSTEMS, 2022, 1346 : 287 - 294
  • [45] Quality of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Following Application of Chemical Agents at Different Stages of Plant Ripeness
    Bojanowska, Monika
    Jackowska, Izabella
    Tys, Jerzy
    PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST, 2013, 96 (03): : 239 - 246
  • [46] Development and yield of the cotton plant under different row spacings and growth regulator application
    Ferrari, Samuel
    Furlani, Enes, Jr.
    Ferrari, Joao Vitor
    Santos, Marcio Lustosa
    Aires dos Santos, Danilo Marcelo
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2008, 30 (03): : 365 - 371
  • [47] Effects of deficit irrigation and plant density on the growth, yield and fiber quality of irrigated cotton
    Zhang, Dongmei
    Luo, Zhen
    Liu, Suhua
    Li, Weijiang
    WeiTang
    Dong, Hezhong
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2016, 197 : 1 - 9
  • [48] Cotton Planting Date and Plant Population Effects on Yield and Fiber Quality in the Mississippi Delta
    Wrather, J.
    Phipps, B.
    Stevens, W.
    Phillips, A.
    Vories, E.
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2008, 12 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [49] SPATIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR COMMON BEANS WITH DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURE AND THEIR EFFECTS ON YIELD AND PLANT COVERING
    Ziviani, Adley Camargo
    Ribeiro Junior, Walter Quadros
    Gerosa Ramos, Maria Lucrecia
    Alves de Freitas Barbosa, Marco Aurelio
    Cordeiro, Anderson
    Franca, Leonice Vieira
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2009, 25 (02): : 1 - 9
  • [50] Adopting different cotton cropping systems may regulate the spatiotemporal variation in soil moisture and affect the growth, WUE and yield of cotton
    Wu, Fengqi
    Yang, Beifang
    Guo, Simeng
    Huang, Weibin
    Lei, Yaping
    Xiong, Shiwu
    Han, Yingchun
    Wang, Zhanbiao
    Feng, Lu
    Li, Xiaofei
    Wang, Guoping
    Chen, Jie
    Li, Yabing
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2022, 186