Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery

被引:7
|
作者
Miscusi, Massimo [1 ]
Trungu, Sokol [1 ,2 ]
Ricciardi, Luca [1 ]
Forcato, Stefano [2 ]
Piazza, Amedeo [1 ]
Ramieri, Alessandro [3 ]
Raco, Antonino [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Sant Andrea Hosp, NESMOS Dept, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Cardinale G Pan Hosp, Neurosurg Unit, I-73039 Tricase, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Fac Pharm & Med, Dept Orthoped, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); adjacent segment disease (ASD); revision lumbar surgery; failed back surgery; minimally invasive spine surgery; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; SPINAL-FUSION; BLOOD-LOSS; DECOMPRESSION; DEGENERATION; STENOSIS; PREVALENCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12082985
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Radiological evidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has been reported to have a prevalence of more than 30% and several risk factors have been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with symptomatic ASD treated with stand-alone OLIF and compare results with a posterior revision surgery cohort. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study. Clinical-patient-reported outcomes were obtained at preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up visits using the Short Form (SF-36) scale, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Radiological measures include lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, segmental coronal Cobb angle and intervertebral disc height (DH). The data are compared with a retrospective series of patients that underwent a posterior revision surgery for ASD. Results: Twenty-eight patients in the OLIF group and 25 patients in the posterior group meet inclusion criteria. The mean ages at the time of the surgery are 65.1 years and 67.5, respectively. The mean follow-up time is 36.1 months (range of 14-56). The clinical outcomes significantly improve from preoperative values from the surgery in both groups. The radiological parameters are significantly improved postoperatively and were maintained at the last follow-up in both groups. A statistically significant difference is observed between the two groups for minor complication rate, length of surgery, blood loss and DH restoration. Conclusions: Stand-alone OLIF is an effective and safe technique with low morbidity and complication rates for the treatment of selected patients with symptomatic ASD following a previous lumbar fusion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adjacent Segment Disease After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Case Series of 1000 Patients
    Okuda, Shinya
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Matsumoto, Tomiya
    Nagamoto, Yukitaka
    Sugiura, Tsuyoshi
    Takahashi, Yoshifumi
    Maeno, Takafumi
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (07) : 722 - 727
  • [32] Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology A Comparative Study With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Park, Hyung-Youl
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Sang-Il
    Min, Hyung-Ki
    Oh, In-Soo
    Seo, Jun-Yeong
    Chang, Dong-Gune
    Park, Jong-Tae
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (10): : 2019 - E433
  • [33] Adjacent segment degeneration after posterolateral lumbar fusion: results and complications of posterior revision surgery
    Dantas, Fernando L.
    Dantas, Francois
    Caires, Antonio C.
    Cariri, Gustavo A.
    Fonseca Filho, Gilberto A.
    Botelho, Ricardo, V
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 67 (04) : 446 - 453
  • [34] BIOMECHANICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ADJACENT SEGMENT LUMBAR FACET JOINT OSTEOARTHRITIS AFTER POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    Mecs, L.
    Sohar, G.
    Wellinger, K.
    Toth, K.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2010, 18 : S230 - S230
  • [35] Clinical value and effectiveness profiles of oblique lateral interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar brucellosis spondylitis
    Jia, Y. -l.
    Zuo, X. -h.
    Zhang, Y.
    Yao, Y.
    Yin, Y. -l.
    Yang, X. -m.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (09) : 3854 - 3863
  • [36] Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Efficacy of Simultaneous Decompression Surgery for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease
    Hikata, Tomohiro
    Kamata, Michihiro
    Furukawa, Mitsuru
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2014, 27 (02): : 70 - 75
  • [37] The Safety and Efficacy of Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease in a Cohort of 44 Patients
    Screven, Ryan
    Pressman, Elliot
    Rao, Gautam
    Freeman, Thomas B.
    Alikhani, Puya
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 149 : E225 - E230
  • [38] Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    You, Ki-Han
    Hyun, Jin-Tak
    Park, Sang-Min
    Kang, Min-Seok
    Cho, Samuel K.
    Park, Hyun-Jin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [39] Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery
    B. Hentenaar
    A. B. Spoor
    J. de Waal Malefijt
    C. H. Diekerhof
    B. L. den Oudsten
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 11
  • [40] Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery
    Hentenaar, B.
    Spoor, A. B.
    Malefijt, J. de Waal
    Diekerhof, C. H.
    den Oudsten, B. L.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2016, 11