Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery

被引:7
|
作者
Miscusi, Massimo [1 ]
Trungu, Sokol [1 ,2 ]
Ricciardi, Luca [1 ]
Forcato, Stefano [2 ]
Piazza, Amedeo [1 ]
Ramieri, Alessandro [3 ]
Raco, Antonino [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Sant Andrea Hosp, NESMOS Dept, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Cardinale G Pan Hosp, Neurosurg Unit, I-73039 Tricase, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Fac Pharm & Med, Dept Orthoped, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); adjacent segment disease (ASD); revision lumbar surgery; failed back surgery; minimally invasive spine surgery; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; SPINAL-FUSION; BLOOD-LOSS; DECOMPRESSION; DEGENERATION; STENOSIS; PREVALENCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12082985
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Radiological evidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has been reported to have a prevalence of more than 30% and several risk factors have been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with symptomatic ASD treated with stand-alone OLIF and compare results with a posterior revision surgery cohort. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study. Clinical-patient-reported outcomes were obtained at preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up visits using the Short Form (SF-36) scale, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Radiological measures include lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, segmental coronal Cobb angle and intervertebral disc height (DH). The data are compared with a retrospective series of patients that underwent a posterior revision surgery for ASD. Results: Twenty-eight patients in the OLIF group and 25 patients in the posterior group meet inclusion criteria. The mean ages at the time of the surgery are 65.1 years and 67.5, respectively. The mean follow-up time is 36.1 months (range of 14-56). The clinical outcomes significantly improve from preoperative values from the surgery in both groups. The radiological parameters are significantly improved postoperatively and were maintained at the last follow-up in both groups. A statistically significant difference is observed between the two groups for minor complication rate, length of surgery, blood loss and DH restoration. Conclusions: Stand-alone OLIF is an effective and safe technique with low morbidity and complication rates for the treatment of selected patients with symptomatic ASD following a previous lumbar fusion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease A STROBE-compliant study
    Zhu, Guangduo
    Hao, Yingjie
    Yu, Lei
    Cai, Yingchun
    Yang, Xiaowei
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [2] Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD)
    Zhang, Bin
    Hu, Yuan
    Kong, Qingquan
    Feng, Pin
    Liu, Junlin
    Ma, Junsong
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [3] Clinical, Radiographic and Fusion Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) stand-alone and OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Zhao, Wenhao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Zhang, Hao
    Guo, Jianwei
    Han, Jialuo
    Lin, Antao
    Wang, Yan
    Ma, Xuexiao
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [4] Clinical, Radiographic and Fusion Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) stand-alone and OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Wenhao Zhao
    Chuanli Zhou
    Hao Zhang
    Jianwei Guo
    Jialuo Han
    Antao Lin
    Yan Wang
    Xuexiao Ma
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [5] Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion
    Louie, Philip K.
    Varthi, Arya G.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Lei, Victor
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Shifflett, Grant D.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (11): : 2025 - 2032
  • [6] Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Construct for the Treatment of Adjacent-Segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease
    Kai, Wang
    Cheng, Cheng
    Yao, Qingyu
    Zhang, Can
    Jian, Fengzeng
    Wu, Hao
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [7] Comparison of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Previous Lumbar Fusion Surgery
    Louie, Philip K.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khan, Jannat M.
    Markowitz, Jonathan
    Movassaghi, Kamran
    Ferguson, Joseph
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    An, Howard S.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (24) : E1461 - E1469
  • [8] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar fusion: a case-controlled study
    Cong Jin
    Minghua Xie
    Lei He
    Wenbin Xu
    Weiqi Han
    Wengqing Liang
    Yu Qian
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14
  • [9] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar fusion: a case-controlled study
    Jin, Cong
    Xie, Minghua
    He, Lei
    Xu, Wenbin
    Han, Weiqi
    Liang, Wengqing
    Qian, Yu
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [10] Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Toshitada Miwa
    Hironobu Sakaura
    Tomoya Yamashita
    Shozo Suzuki
    Tetsuo Ohwada
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 2864 - 2868