Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Similar Rates of Prosthetic Noise Generation as Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:1
|
作者
Cozzarelli, Nicholas F. [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Irfan A. [1 ]
Imam, Nareena [1 ]
Klein, Gregg R. [1 ]
Levine, Harlan [1 ]
Seidenstein, Ari [1 ]
Zaid, Musa B. [1 ]
Lonner, Jess H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Div Adult Reconstruct, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Rothman Orthopaed Inst, 125 S 9th St,Ste 1000, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2023年 / 23卷
关键词
Total knee arthroplasty; TKA; Robotic assisted; Noise generation; Satisfaction; YOUNG-PATIENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2023.101216
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Noise has been reported to occur with relatively high frequency after conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA), and this may impact the incidence of patient satisfaction and function. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of patient-reported prosthetic noise generation after robotically-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) and C-TKA.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of unilateral primary RA-TKAs and C-TKAs performed between 2018 and 2021. Patients completed a survey consisting of 4 Likert scale questions related to prosthetic noise generation and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score Joint Replacement and Forgotten Joint Score were assessed prospectively preoperatively and at a minimum of 1-year of clinical follow-up. Statistical analysis was done utilizing T-tests and chi-square tests, with statistical significance defined as a P-value < .05.Results: One hundred sixty-two RA-TKAs and 320 C-TKAs with similar baseline characteristics and functions were included. There were no significant differences in hearing or feeling grinding, popping, clicking, or clunking (40.7% vs 38.1%; P = .647) between groups. Most RA-TKAs and C-TKAs were not dissatisfied regarding noise generation (70.4% vs 73.1%; P = .596). In both cohorts, patients who reported noise generation had lower average Forgotten Joint Scores (45.5 vs 66.1; P < .001) and lower postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score Joint Replacement scores (72.0 vs 81.4; P < .001) than those who did not experience noise generation.Conclusions: While RA-TKA may facilitate soft tissue balancing, there were no differences in prosthetic noise generation between RA-TKA and C-TKA. However, those who experience implant-generated noise have lower functional outcome scores.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic-arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty
    Magruder, Matthew L.
    Mcclure, Tanner
    Marchand, Kevin
    Mont, Michael A.
    Marchand, Robert C.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 52 : 119 - 123
  • [42] Image-Free Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Quicker Recovery but Equivalent One-Year Outcomes Compared to Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Khan, Irfan A.
    Vaile, John R.
    DeSimone, Cristian A.
    Parsell, Douglas E.
    Heinze, Jared D.
    Alessi, Alexandra
    Xu, Winnie
    Shah, Roshan P.
    Pickering, Trevor
    Cafferky, Nathan L.
    Lonner, Jess H.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (06): : S232 - S237
  • [43] Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty results in decreased incidence of anterior femoral notching compared to posterior referenced instrumented total knee arthroplasty
    Li, Mingyang
    Zhang, Yongtao
    Shao, Zhenshuai
    Zhu, Haoxiang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 32 (01)
  • [44] Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: What are Patients' Perspectives, Understanding and Expectations?
    Abdelaal, Mohammad S.
    Wiafe, Bright M.
    Khan, Irfan A.
    Magnuson, Justin A.
    Saxena, Arjun
    Smith, Eric B.
    Lonner, Jess H.
    Star, Andrew M.
    Good, Robert P.
    Sharkey, Peter F.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (09): : 1726 - 1733.e4
  • [45] Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty is Safe in the Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting
    Eason, Travis
    Mihalko, William
    Toy, Patrick C.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 54 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [46] Coronal Correction for Severe Deformity Using Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Marchand, Robert C.
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Khlopas, Anton
    Sultan, Assem A.
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    Stearns, Kim L.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (01) : 2 - 5
  • [47] Is Immediate Postoperative Radiograph Necessary Following Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty?
    Giordano, Joshua R.
    Bartlett, Lucas
    Huyke, Fernando
    Sadh, Puru
    Thompson, Kiara
    Ajah, Obinnah
    Danoff, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (12) : 851 - 855
  • [48] Robotic-assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Tamam, Cuneyt
    Poehling, Gary G.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2014, 22 (04): : 219 - 222
  • [49] Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Khlopas, Anton
    Sodhi, Nipun
    Sultan, Assem A.
    Chughtai, Morad
    Molloy, Robert M.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (07): : 2002 - 2006
  • [50] Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Is there a maximum level of efficiency for the operating surgeon?
    Patel, Kishan
    Judd, Hyrum
    Harm, Richard G.
    Nolan, Joseph R.
    Hummel, Matthew
    Spanyer, Jonathon
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 31 : 13 - 16