Taking PI-QUAL beyond the prostate: Towards a standardized radiological image quality score (RI-QUAL)

被引:3
|
作者
Becker, Anton S. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Giganti, Francesco [3 ,4 ]
Purysko, Andrei S. [5 ]
Fainberg, Jonathan [6 ]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Woo, Sungmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU Langone, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[4] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiol, Abdominal Imaging Sect, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Health care operations; Quality control; Quality assurance; Prostate MRI; Standardized reporting; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110955
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the interreader agreement of a novel quality score, called the Radiological Image Quality Score (RI-QUAL), to a slighly modified version of the existing Prostate Imaging Quality (mPI-QUAL) score for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate. Methods: A total of 43 consecutive scans were evaluated by two subspecialized radiologists who assigned scores using both the RI-QUAL and mPI-QUAL methods. The interreader agreement was analyzed using three statistical methods: concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Cohen's kappa. Time needed to arrive at a quality judgment was measured and compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: The interreader agreement for RI-QUAL and mPI-QUAL scores was comparable, as evidenced by the high CCC (0.76 vs. 0.77, p = 0.93), ICC (0.86 vs. 0.87, p = 0.93), and moderate Cohen's kappa (0.61 vs. 0.64, p = 0.85) values. Moreover, RI-QUAL assessment was faster than mPI-QUAL (19 vs. 40 s, p = 0.001). Conclusion: RI-QUAL is a new quality score that has comparable interreader agreement to the mPI-QUAL score, but with the potential to be applied to different MRI protocols and even different modalities. Like PI-QUAL, RIQUAL may also facilitate communication about quality to referring physicians, as it provides a standardized and easily interpretable score. Further studies are warranted to validate the usefulness of RI-QUAL in larger patient cohorts and for other imaging modalities.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Interobserver reproducibility of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score for prostate MRI quality
    Giganti, F.
    Dinneen, E.
    Kasivisvanathan, V.
    Haider, A.
    Freeman, A.
    Emberton, M.
    Shaw, G.
    Moore, C. M.
    Allen, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1282 - S1283
  • [2] Impact of prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Lavalle, Salvatore
    Parry, Tom
    Cosenza, Michele
    Russo, Tommaso
    Mazzone, Elio
    Pellegrino, Francesco
    Stabile, Armando
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Esposito, Antonio
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 164
  • [3] Inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score: A bicentric study
    Girometti, Rossano
    Blandino, Alfredo
    Zichichi, Clara
    Cicero, Giuseppe
    Cereser, Lorenzo
    De Martino, Maria
    Isola, Miriam
    Zuiani, Chiara
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Valotto, Claudio
    Bertolotto, Michele
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 150
  • [4] Prostate MRI quality: a critical review of the last 5 years and the role of the PI-QUAL score
    Giganti, Francesco
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Kirkham, Alex
    Punwani, Shonit
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Allen, Clare
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1131):
  • [5] Understanding PI-QUAL for prostate MRI quality: a practical primer for radiologists
    Giganti, Francesco
    Kirkham, Alex
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Papoutsaki, Marianthi-Vasiliki
    Punwani, Shonit
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Allen, Clare
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [6] Effect of a dedicated PI-QUAL curriculum on the assessment of prostate MRI quality
    Wang, Richard
    Pinto, Denver
    Liu, TianHao
    Hamade, Mohamad
    Jubane, Maverick
    Arif, Aazim
    Boateng, Joseph
    Maloney, Sean
    Amin, Ayush
    Sandhu, Jagteshwar
    Nini, Saad
    Manov, John
    Tordjman, Laura
    Villavicencio, Joseph
    Chamoun, Michelle
    Leslom, Salman
    Aristizabal, Julieta
    Felix, Marcelo
    Gomez-Rodriguez, Carolina
    Alessandrino, Francesco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 164
  • [7] Understanding PI-QUAL for prostate MRI quality: a practical primer for radiologists
    Francesco Giganti
    Alex Kirkham
    Veeru Kasivisvanathan
    Marianthi-Vasiliki Papoutsaki
    Shonit Punwani
    Mark Emberton
    Caroline M. Moore
    Clare Allen
    Insights into Imaging, 12
  • [8] Micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI: effects on rectal gas, image quality and PI-QUAL score
    Jacob Palmer
    Leon Winata
    Melanie Seale
    Tom Sutherland
    Mark Page
    Abdominal Radiology, 2025, 50 (4) : 1662 - 1671
  • [9] Prostate MRI quality: clinical impact of the PI-QUAL score in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up
    Karanasios, Eleftherios
    Caglic, Iztok
    Zawaideh, Jeries P.
    Barrett, Tristan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1133):
  • [10] Inter-reader agreement of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality in the NeuroSAFE PROOF trial
    Francesco Giganti
    Eoin Dinneen
    Veeru Kasivisvanathan
    Aiman Haider
    Alex Freeman
    Alex Kirkham
    Shonit Punwani
    Mark Emberton
    Greg Shaw
    Caroline M. Moore
    Clare Allen
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 879 - 889