Effect of a dedicated PI-QUAL curriculum on the assessment of prostate MRI quality

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Richard [1 ]
Pinto, Denver [1 ]
Liu, TianHao [2 ]
Hamade, Mohamad [1 ]
Jubane, Maverick [1 ]
Arif, Aazim [1 ]
Boateng, Joseph [1 ]
Maloney, Sean [1 ]
Amin, Ayush [1 ]
Sandhu, Jagteshwar [1 ]
Nini, Saad [1 ]
Manov, John [1 ]
Tordjman, Laura [1 ]
Villavicencio, Joseph [1 ]
Chamoun, Michelle [1 ]
Leslom, Salman [1 ]
Aristizabal, Julieta [1 ]
Felix, Marcelo [1 ]
Gomez-Rodriguez, Carolina [1 ]
Alessandrino, Francesco [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Jackson Mem Hosp, Leonard M Miller Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Leonard M Miller Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Div Biostat, Miami, FL USA
[3] Leonard M Miller Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Div Abdominal Imaging, Miami, FL USA
[4] Univ Miami Hlth Syst, Leonard M Miller Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Div Abdominal Imaging, 1611 NW 12th Ave West,Wing 279, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
CANCER; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110865
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score is a metric to evaluate the diagnostic quality of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate. This study evaluated the impact of a prostate MRI quality training lecture on the participant's ability to assess prostate MRI image quality.Methods: Eighteen in-training-radiologists of varying experience in reviewing diagnostic prostate MRI assessed the image quality of ten examinations. Then, they attended a dedicated lecture on MRI quality assessment using the PI-QUAL score. After the lecture, the same participants evaluated the image quality of a new set of ten scans applying the PI-QUAL score. Results were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The reference standard was the PI-QUAL score assessed by a fellowship trained abdominal radiologist with experience in reading prostate MRI.Results: There was a significant improvement in the average area under the curve (AUC) for assessment of prostate MRI image quality from baseline (0.82; [0.576 - 0.888]) to post teaching (1.0; [0.954-1]), with an improvement of 0.18 (p < 0.03). When ROC curves were computed for different cohorts stratified based on year of training, difference ranged from 0.48 for second year residents to 0.32 for fourth year residents (p < 0.001-0.01). For abdominal imaging fellows, the pre-teaching AUC was 0.9 [0.557-1] and post teaching AUC was 1 [0.957-1], a difference of 0.1 (p = 0.20).Conclusions: A dedicated lecture on PI-QUAL improved the ability of radiologists-in-training to assess prostate MRI image quality, with variable impact depending on year of training.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interobserver reproducibility of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score for prostate MRI quality
    Giganti, F.
    Dinneen, E.
    Kasivisvanathan, V.
    Haider, A.
    Freeman, A.
    Emberton, M.
    Shaw, G.
    Moore, C. M.
    Allen, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1282 - S1283
  • [2] Understanding PI-QUAL for prostate MRI quality: a practical primer for radiologists
    Giganti, Francesco
    Kirkham, Alex
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Papoutsaki, Marianthi-Vasiliki
    Punwani, Shonit
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Allen, Clare
    [J]. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [3] Understanding PI-QUAL for prostate MRI quality: a practical primer for radiologists
    Francesco Giganti
    Alex Kirkham
    Veeru Kasivisvanathan
    Marianthi-Vasiliki Papoutsaki
    Shonit Punwani
    Mark Emberton
    Caroline M. Moore
    Clare Allen
    [J]. Insights into Imaging, 12
  • [4] Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
    Giganti, Francesco
    Lindner, Sydney
    Piper, Jonathan W.
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Allen, Clare
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [5] Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
    Francesco Giganti
    Sydney Lindner
    Jonathan W. Piper
    Veeru Kasivisvanathan
    Mark Emberton
    Caroline M. Moore
    Clare Allen
    [J]. European Radiology Experimental, 5
  • [6] PI-QUAL version 2: an update of a standardised scoring system for the assessment of image quality of prostate MRI
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Allen, Clare
    Twilt, Jasper J.
    Thijssen, Linda C. P.
    Asbach, Patrick
    Barrett, Tristan
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Emberton, Mark
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Logager, Vibeke
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Puech, Philippe
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Salomon, Georg
    Sanguedolce, Francesco
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Thony, Harriet C.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Villeirs, Geert
    Walz, Jochen
    Barentsz, Jelle
    Giganti, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [7] IMPACT OF PROSTATE MRI QUALITY (PI-QUAL) ON CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATES
    Scovell, Jason M.
    Ardines, Kassandra Zaila
    Liao, Ross
    Singh, Kailash
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Weight, Christopher
    Purysko, Andrei
    Ward, Ryan
    Schwen, Zeyad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E304 - E305
  • [8] Prostate MRI quality: a critical review of the last 5 years and the role of the PI-QUAL score
    Giganti, Francesco
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Kirkham, Alex
    Punwani, Shonit
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Allen, Clare
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1131):
  • [9] Prostate MRI quality: clinical impact of the PI-QUAL score in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up
    Karanasios, Eleftherios
    Caglic, Iztok
    Zawaideh, Jeries P.
    Barrett, Tristan
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1133):
  • [10] Inter-reader agreement of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality in the NeuroSAFE PROOF trial
    Giganti, Francesco
    Dinneen, Eoin
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Haider, Aiman
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex
    Punwani, Shonit
    Emberton, Mark
    Shaw, Greg
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Allen, Clare
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 879 - 889