Does transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) reduce pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients? A randomized controlled pilot study

被引:7
|
作者
Halim, Muhammad Jasman Erwin [1 ]
Arfianti, Lydia [1 ]
Pawana, I. Putu Alit [1 ]
Melaniani, Soenarnatalina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Airlangga, Dr Soetomo Gen Acad Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Fac Med, Surabaya, Indonesia
[2] Univ Airlangga, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Biostat Populat Studies & Hlth Pro, Surabaya, Indonesia
关键词
Low Back Pain; Pain Intensity; NPRS; tVNS; EXERCISE;
D O I
10.15562/bmj.v12i1.3929
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Low back pain, if poorly treated, is responsible for a decline in patients' quality of life. In addition to medication and exercise therapy, transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) emerges as one of the modalities for chronic pain. Currently, studies on the effect of tVNS on pain intensity, particularly in chronic low back pain cases, are still scarce. This study aims to examine the effect of tVNS in addition to exercise treatment on patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: Twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the control group, which included eleven patients who received only exercise therapy, and the intervention group, which included eleven patients who received exercise therapy with tVNS as an additional therapy. The demographic data of the participants and the results of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were used as outcome measures. Data were collected before and after the two-week treatment period. Safety and adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Results: The mean NPRS decreased in both groups, with the intervention group decreasing from 5.45 to 1.73 (p < 0.001) and the control group decreasing from 5.82 to 3.27 (p < 0.001). Although the intervention group's average NPRS score decreased more than the control groups, no significant difference was found (p=1.04). Following Cohen's D, the effect size of the intervention group was more significant (2.22) than that of the control group (1.62). Conclusion: These findings imply that tVNS should be considered an additional therapy for chronic low back pain patients. During the study, no side effects were discovered.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 428
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Balneotherapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled study
    Kesiktas, Nur
    Karakas, Sinem
    Gun, Kerem
    Gun, Nuran
    Murat, Sadiye
    Uludag, Murat
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 32 (10) : 3193 - 3199
  • [42] Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduce the laparoscopic related shoulder pain?
    Kashi, Abolfazl Mehdizadeh
    Khodaverdi, Sepideh
    Govahi, Azam
    Sarhadi, Saeedeh
    Kaveh, Mania
    Sadegi, Kambiz
    Derakhshan, Roya
    Ajdary, Marziyeh
    Chaichian, Shahla
    OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2024, 67 (01) : 94 - 100
  • [43] Effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Qiuling
    Dou, Jun
    Ao, Hua
    Guo, Dongmei
    Yang, Xi
    Li, Ming
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2025,
  • [44] Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on the Pain Intensity During Insertion of Needle in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Study
    AminiSaman, Javad
    Karimpour, Hasan A.
    Hemmatpour, Behzad
    Mohammadi, Saeed
    Darvishi, Saeed
    Kawyannejad, Rasool
    JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE AND MERIDIAN STUDIES, 2020, 13 (03) : 83 - 86
  • [45] A randomized comparative trial of acupuncture versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic back pain in the elderly
    Grant, DJ
    Bishop-Miller, J
    Winchester, DM
    Anderson, M
    Faulkner, S
    PAIN, 1999, 82 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [46] Effects of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) on the P300 and Alpha-Amylase Level: A Pilot Study
    Ventura-Bort, Carlos
    Wirkner, Janine
    Genheimer, Hannah
    Wendt, Julia
    Hamm, Alfons O.
    Weymar, Mathias
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [47] Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial
    Facci, Ligia Maria
    Nowotny, Jean Paulus
    Tormem, Fabio
    Moca Trevisani, Virginia Fernandes
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 129 (04): : 206 - 216
  • [48] The Predictive Value of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patient Selection in Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study
    Schwarm, Frank Patrick
    Ott, Marc
    Nagl, Jasmin
    Bender, Michael
    Stein, Marco
    Uhl, Eberhard
    Maxeiner, Hagen
    Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (06): : 1051 - 1058
  • [49] Randomized study of the impact of a therapeutic education program on patients suffering from chronic low-back pain who are treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
    Garaud, Thomas
    Gervais, Christine
    Szekely, Barbara
    Michel-Cherqui, Mireille
    Dreyfus, Jean-Francois
    Fischler, Marc
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (52)
  • [50] Efficacy of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) in the treatment of chronic low back pain
    Topuz, O
    Özfidan, E
    Sarhus, M
    Ardiç, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2004, 27 : 168 - 168