Machine-Learning-Based Classification for Pipeline Corrosion with Monte Carlo Probabilistic Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Ismail, Mohd Fadly Hisham [1 ]
May, Zazilah [1 ,2 ]
Asirvadam, Vijanth Sagayan [1 ]
Nayan, Nazrul Anuar [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Elect & Elect Engn Dept, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Dept Elect Elect & Syst Engn, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Inst Islam Hadhari, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
pipeline corrosion; in-line inspection; machine learning; reliability analysis; SIGNALS; WAVELETS;
D O I
10.3390/en16083589
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Pipeline corrosion is one of the leading causes of failures in the transmission of gas and hazardous liquids in the oil and gas industry. In-line inspection is a non-destructive inspection for detecting corrosion defects in pipelines. Defects are measured in terms of their width, length and depth. Consecutive in-line inspection data are used to determine the pipeline's corrosion growth rate and its remnant life, which set the operational and maintenance activities of the pipeline. The traditional approach of manually processing in-line inspection data has various weaknesses, including being time consuming due to huge data volume and complexity, prone to error, subject to biased judgement by experts and challenging for matching of in-line inspection datasets. This paper aimed to contribute to the adoption of machine learning approaches in classifying pipeline defects as per Pipeline Operator Forum requirements and matching in-line inspection data for determining the corrosion growth rate and remnant life of pipelines. Machine learning techniques, namely, decision tree, random forest, support vector machines and logistic regression, were applied in the classification of pipeline defects using Phyton programming. The performance of each technique in terms of the accuracy of results was compared. The results showed that the decision tree classifier model was the most accurate (99.9%) compared with the other classifiers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine-Learning-based User Behavior Classification for Improving Security Awareness Provision
    Al-Mashhour, Alaa
    Alhogail, Dr. Areej
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 14 (08) : 166 - 178
  • [22] Machine-Learning-Based Vulnerability Detection and Classification in Internet of Things Device Security
    Bin Hulayyil, Sarah
    Li, Shancang
    Xu, Lida
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [23] Data Augmentation Methods for Machine-learning-based Classification of Bio-signals
    Sakai, Asuka
    Minoda, Yuki
    Morikawa, Koji
    2017 10TH BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (BMEICON), 2017,
  • [24] Machine-Learning-Based Classification Approaches toward Recognizing Slope Stability Failure
    Moayedi, Hossein
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Kalantar, Bahareh
    Foong, Loke Kok
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (21):
  • [25] Machine-learning-based image categorization
    Han, YT
    Qi, XJ
    IMAGE ANALYSIS AND RECOGNITION, 2005, 3656 : 585 - 592
  • [26] Machine-Learning-Based Accessibility System
    Banerjee K.
    Singh A.
    Akhtar N.
    Vats I.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (3)
  • [27] Machine-learning-based computed tomography radiomic analysis for histologic subtype classification of thymic epithelial tumours
    Hu, Jianping
    Zhao, Yijing
    Li, Mengcheng
    Liu, Yin
    Wang, Feng
    Weng, Qiang
    You, Ruixiong
    Cao, Dairong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 126
  • [28] Accurate Machine-Learning-Based classification of Leukemia from Blood Smear Images
    Dese, Kokeb
    Raj, Hakkins
    Ayana, Gelan
    Yemane, Tilahun
    Adissu, Wondimagegn
    Krishnamoorthy, Janarthanan
    Kwa, Timothy
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2021, 21 (11): : E903 - E914
  • [29] Ensemble Machine-Learning-Based Analysis for In Situ Electron Diffraction
    Ge, Mengshu
    Liu, Xiaozhi
    Zhao, Zhicheng
    Su, Fei
    Gu, Lin
    Su, Dong
    ADVANCED THEORY AND SIMULATIONS, 2022, 5 (04)
  • [30] Seismic attribute selection for machine-learning-based facies analysis
    Qi, Jie
    Zhang, Bo
    Lyu, Bin
    Marfurt, Kurt
    GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (02) : O17 - O35