Evaluation of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), Simubone TM, and photopolymer resin as 3D-printed temporal bone models for simulation

被引:1
|
作者
Cafino, Rentor [1 ,2 ]
Soliven, Maria Monique Theresita [1 ,2 ]
Velasco, Lemuel Clark [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lopez, Kim Harold [5 ]
机构
[1] Zamboanga City Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Zamboanga City, Philippines
[2] ENT HNS Med Makerspace, Zamboanga City, Philippines
[3] Mindanao State Univ, Iligan Inst Technol, Dept Informat Technol, Iligan, Philippines
[4] Ctr Computat Analyt & Modelling, Premiere Res Inst Sci & Math, Iligan, Philippines
[5] Univ Philippines Diliman, Dept Mech Engn, Quezon City, Philippines
关键词
3D printed temporal bone; Anatomical models; Surgical simulation; Polyethylene terephthalate glycol; SimuboneTM; Photopolymer resin;
D O I
10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.095
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Among types of 3D printing, fused deposition modeling (FDM) and digital light processing (DLP) are the most accessible, making them attractive, low-cost options for simulating surgical procedures. This study characterized and compared inexpensive, synthetic temporal bone models printed using Resin, PETG, and SimuboneTM. Materials and methods: This study compared models made of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), SimuboneTM produced from a FDM printer, and photopolymer resin from a DLP printer. These temporal bone models were processed by: (1) DICOM files from a patient's CT scan were segmented to define critical parts expected in a temporal bone surgery. (2) The model was appended with a base that articulates with a 3D-printed temporal bone holder. (3) The refined, patient-specific model was manufactured using FDM and DLP printing technologies. (4) The models were sent to evaluators, who assessed the models based on anatomic accuracy, dissection experience, and its applicability as a surgical simulation tool for temporal bone dissection. Results: The photopolymer resin outperformed PETG and SimuboneTM in terms of anatomical accuracy and dissection experience. Additionally, resin and PETG were evaluated to be appropriate for simple mastoidectomy and canal wall down mastoidectomy while SimuboneTM was only suitable for simple mastoidectomy. All models were unsuitable for posterior tympanotomy and labyrinthectomy. Conclusions: Photopolymer resin and PETG have shown to be suitable materials for dissection models with 3D-printed resin models showing more accuracy in replicating anatomical structures and dissection experience. Hence, the use of 3D-printed temporal bones may be a suitable low-cost alternative to cadaveric dissection. (c) 2024 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D Printed Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Thurzo, A.
    Zamborsky, R.
    Bohac, M.
    Danisovic, L.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S350 - S350
  • [22] Impact of Carbon Fiber Reinforcement on Mechanical and Tribological Behavior of 3D-Printed Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Polymer Composites-An Experimental Investigation
    Kichloo, Aysha Farzana
    Raina, Ankush
    Ul Haq, Mir Irfan
    Wani, Mohd Shaharyar
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2022, 31 (02) : 1021 - 1038
  • [23] Experimental investigation of the effect of infill parameters on dynamic compressive performance of 3D-Printed carbon fiber reinforced polyethylene terephthalate glycol composites
    Chihi, Manel
    Tarfaoui, Mostapha
    Qureshi, Yumna
    Daly, Mohamed
    Bouraoui, Chokri
    JOURNAL OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2024, 37 (10) : 3158 - 3184
  • [24] Effect of FDM process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D-printed fabrics and yarns from polyethylene terephthalate glycol, nylon and thermoplastic polyurethane
    Sapkota, Ashok
    Ghimire, Shree Kaji
    Adanur, Sabit
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [25] Development of 3D printable cenosphere-reinforced polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) filaments for lightweight structural applications
    Kumar, Jitendra
    Negi, Sushant
    POLYMER COMPOSITES, 2023, 44 (10) : 7030 - 7039
  • [26] 3D-Printed Disease Models for Neurosurgical Planning, Simulation, and Training
    Park, Chul-Kee
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 65 (04) : 489 - 498
  • [27] Trajectory simulation of 3D-printed container models based on CFD
    Yu, Hanqi
    Xiang, Gong
    Li, Yi
    Zhou, Hui
    Yu, Xiaochuan
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 291
  • [28] The 10 Commandments of Building 3D-Printed Models for Surgical Simulation
    Chen, Sarah
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 18 (05) : 408 - 413
  • [29] Embolization of visceral arterial aneurysms: Simulation with 3D-printed models
    Shibata, Eisuke
    Takao, Hidemasa
    Amemiya, Shiori
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    Abe, Osamu
    VASCULAR, 2020, 28 (03) : 259 - 266
  • [30] Multi-institutional Comparison of Temporal Bone Models: A Collaboration of the AAO-HNSF 3D-Printed Temporal Bone Working Group
    Mowry, Sarah E.
    Jabbour, Noel
    Rose, Austin S.
    Wiet, Gregory J.
    Svrakic, Maja
    Zopf, David A.
    Vankoevering, Kyle
    Powell, Allison
    Freiser, Monika E.
    Hochman, Jordan
    Smith, Richard
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 164 (05) : 1077 - 1084