Conceptual approaches in combating health inequity: A scoping review protocol

被引:2
|
作者
Amri, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
Mohamood, Liban [3 ]
Mansilla, Cristian [4 ,5 ]
Barrett, Kathryn [6 ]
Bump, Jesse B. B. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Takemi Program Int Hlth, Boston, MA 02138 USA
[2] Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto Scarborough, Dept Hlth & Soc, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, McMaster Hlth Forum, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Scarborough Lib, Scarborough, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Bergen, Bergen Ctr Eth & Prior Setting, Bergen, Norway
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0282858
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
IntroductionWhat are the different ways in which health equity can be sought through policy and programs? Although there is a central focus on health equity in global and public health, we recognize that stakeholders can understand health equity as taking different approaches and that there is not a single conceptual approach. However, information on conceptual categories of actions to improve health equity and/or reduce health inequity is scarce. Therefore, this study asks the research question: "what conceptual approaches exist in striving for health equity and/or reducing health inequity?" with the aim of presenting a comprehensive overview of approaches. MethodsA scoping review will be undertaken following the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and in consultation with a research librarian. Both the peer-reviewed and grey literatures will be searched using: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, PAIS Index (ProQuest), JSTOR, Canadian Public Documents Collection, the World Health Organization IRIS (Institutional Repository for Information Sharing), and supplemented by a Google Advanced Search. Screening will be conducted by two independent reviewers and data will be charted, coded, and narratively synthesized. DiscussionWe anticipate developing a foundational document compiling categories of approaches and discussing the nuances inherent in each conceptualization to promote clarified and united action.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indigenous approaches to health assessment: a scoping review protocol
    Sharma, Nabina
    Walker, Jennifer D.
    Wenghofer, Elizabeth
    Moeke-Pickering, Taima
    Lindenbach, Jeannette
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [2] Indigenous approaches to health assessment: a scoping review protocol
    Nabina Sharma
    Jennifer D. Walker
    Elizabeth Wenghofer
    Taima Moeke-Pickering
    Jeannette Lindenbach
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 13
  • [3] Global evidence of gender inequity in academic health research: a living scoping review protocol
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Lachance, Chantelle C.
    Rios, Patricia
    Darvesh, Nazia
    Antony, Jesmin
    Radhakrishnan, Amruta
    Anand, Sonia S.
    Baxter, Nancy
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Coyle, Doug
    Curran, Janet A.
    Fiest, Kirsten
    Graham, Ian D.
    Hawker, Gillian
    Legare, France
    Watt, Jennifer
    Witteman, Holly O.
    Clark, Jocalyn P.
    Bourgeault, Ivy Lynn
    Leigh, Jeanna Parsons
    Ahmed, Sofia B.
    Lawford, Karen
    Aiken, Alice
    Falk-Krzesinski, Holly J.
    Langlois, Etienne V.
    McCabe, Chris
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Skidmore, Becky
    Pattani, Reena
    Leon, Natalie
    Lundine, Jamie
    Adisso, Lionel
    El-Adhami, Wafa
    Straus, Sharon E.
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (10) : 2181 - 2193
  • [4] Public health approaches to substance use: a scoping review protocol
    Kosteniuk, Brynn
    Speed, Kelsey
    Candler, Ethan
    Campbell, Sandy
    Penney, Greg
    Moen, Karin
    Hyshka, Elaine
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (09) : 2395 - 2407
  • [5] Health Equity and Health Inequity of Disabled People: A Scoping Review
    Wolbring, Gregor
    Deloria, Rochelle
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [6] Approaches to Indigenous health within interprofessional education: a scoping review protocol
    Mathur, Salina
    Aydin, Cara
    Langlois, Sylvia
    Sangrar, Ruheena
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (11) : 3040 - 3047
  • [7] Conceptual and theoretical models for cybercivility in education in health professions: a scoping review protocol
    De Gagne, Jennie C.
    Woodward, Amanda
    Koppel, Paula D.
    Park, Hyeyoung K.
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (05) : 1019 - 1027
  • [8] Conceptual approaches to wellbeing in buildings: a scoping review
    Hanc, Madalina
    McAndrew, Claire
    Ucci, Marcella
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2019, 47 (06): : 767 - 783
  • [9] Protocol for a scoping review of implementation research approaches to universal health coverage in Africa
    Nnaji, Chukwudi A.
    Wiysonge, Charles S.
    Okeibunor, Joseph
    Malinga, Thobile
    Adamu, Abdu A.
    Tumusiime, Prosper
    Karamagi, Humphrey
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [10] Approaches to implementing individual placement and support in the health and welfare sectors: a scoping review protocol
    Moe, Cathrine
    Brinchmann, Beate
    McDaid, David
    Killackey, Eoin
    Rinaldi, Miles
    Mykletun, Arnstein
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (01) : 170 - 177