Indigenous approaches to health assessment: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Sharma, Nabina [1 ]
Walker, Jennifer D. [2 ]
Wenghofer, Elizabeth [1 ]
Moeke-Pickering, Taima [3 ]
Lindenbach, Jeannette [4 ]
机构
[1] Laurentian Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Laurentian Univ, Sch Indigenous Relat, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[4] Laurentian Univ, Sch Nursing, Sudbury, ON, Canada
关键词
Indigenous health; Health assessment; Culturally safe; Indigenous knowledge; Scoping review; Indigenous approaches;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-024-02496-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundHealth assessment tools developed using mainstream or Western concepts have been widely used in clinical practice worldwide. However, even culturally adapted or culturally based tools may not be relevant in other social contexts if they are grounded in Western beliefs and perspectives. The application of mainstream assessment tools, when used in Indigenous populations, can lead to the inappropriate application of normative data and inaccurate or biased diagnosis of conditions as Indigenous concepts of health differ from Western biomedical concepts of health. Thus, considering the need for culturally meaningful, sensitive, safe, and unbiased health assessment approaches and instruments over recent years, tools have been developed or adapted by and with Indigenous populations in Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. However, there is no existing systematic or scoping review to identify the methods and approaches used in adapting or developing health assessment tools for use with the Indigenous population in Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand, Canada, and the United States.MethodsIn response to these gaps, we are working with a First Nations Community Advisory Group in Northern Ontario, Canada, to undertake a scoping review following the 2020 JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, APA PsychINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Bibliography of Native North Americans, Australian Indigenous Health info data set, and Indigenous Health Portal. Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion using criteria co-developed with an advisory group. We will chart the extracted information and summarize and synthesize the data. The summarized findings will be presented to a Community Advisory Group, including First Nations community partners, an Elder, and community members, and their feedback will be incorporated into the discussion section of the scoping review.DiscussionThis scoping review involves iterative consultation with the Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars, First Nations Community Advisory Group, and community partners throughout the research process. This review aims to summarize the evidence on standard ethical approaches and practices used in Indigenous research while adapting or developing health assessment tools. It will inform the larger study focused on developing an Indigenous Functional Assessment tool. Further, it will seek whether the Indigenous ways of knowing and equitable participation of Indigenous people and communities are incorporated in the Indigenous research process.Systematic review registrationOpen Science Framework https://osf.io/yznwk.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indigenous approaches to health assessment: a scoping review protocol
    Nabina Sharma
    Jennifer D. Walker
    Elizabeth Wenghofer
    Taima Moeke-Pickering
    Jeannette Lindenbach
    Systematic Reviews, 13
  • [2] Approaches to Indigenous health within interprofessional education: a scoping review protocol
    Mathur, Salina
    Aydin, Cara
    Langlois, Sylvia
    Sangrar, Ruheena
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (11) : 3040 - 3047
  • [3] Indigenous perspectives on wellness and health in Canada: study protocol for a scoping review
    K. Thiessen
    M. Haworth-Brockman
    R. Stout
    P. Moffitt
    J. Gelowitz
    J. Schneider
    L. Demczuk
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [4] Indigenous perspectives on wellness and health in Canada: study protocol for a scoping review
    Thiessen, K.
    Haworth-Brockman, M.
    Stout, R.
    Moffitt, P.
    Gelowitz, J.
    Schneider, J.
    Demczuk, L.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [5] Public health approaches to substance use: a scoping review protocol
    Kosteniuk, Brynn
    Speed, Kelsey
    Candler, Ethan
    Campbell, Sandy
    Penney, Greg
    Moen, Karin
    Hyshka, Elaine
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (09) : 2395 - 2407
  • [6] Conceptual approaches in combating health inequity: A scoping review protocol
    Amri, Michelle
    Mohamood, Liban
    Mansilla, Cristian
    Barrett, Kathryn
    Bump, Jesse B. B.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [7] Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers
    Rieger, Kendra L.
    Gazan, Sarah
    Bennett, Marlyn
    Buss, Mandy
    Chudyk, Anna M.
    Cook, Lillian
    Copenace, Sherry
    Garson, Cindy
    Hack, Thomas F.
    Hornan, Bobbie
    Horrill, Tara
    Horton, Mabel
    Howard, Sandra
    Linton, Janice
    Martin, Donna
    McPherson, Kim
    Rattray, Jennifer Moore
    Phillips-Beck, Wanda
    Sinclair, Rebecca
    Schultz, Annette S. H.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [8] Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers
    Kendra L. Rieger
    Sarah Gazan
    Marlyn Bennett
    Mandy Buss
    Anna M. Chudyk
    Lillian Cook
    Sherry Copenace
    Cindy Garson
    Thomas F. Hack
    Bobbie Hornan
    Tara Horrill
    Mabel Horton
    Sandra Howard
    Janice Linton
    Donna Martin
    Kim McPherson
    Jennifer Moore Rattray
    Wanda Phillips-Beck
    Rebecca Sinclair
    Annette S. H. Schultz
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [9] Quality Assessment of Digital Health Applications: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Giebel, Godwin Denk
    Schrader, Nils Frederik
    Speckemeier, Christian
    Abels, Carina
    Boerchers, Kirstin
    Wasem, Jurgen
    Blase, Nikola
    Neusser, Silke
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (07):
  • [10] A protocol for a scoping review to map the assessment approaches in optometry education programmes globally
    Diane van Staden
    Verusia Chetty
    Alvin Jeffrey Munsamy
    Systematic Reviews, 11