Long term outcomes of robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction: a single surgeon experience

被引:3
|
作者
Halpern, D. K. [1 ]
Liu, H. [1 ]
Amodu, L. I. [1 ]
Weinman, K. [1 ]
Akerman, M. [2 ]
Petrone, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hosp Long Isl, NYU Long Isl Sch Med, Dept Surg, 222 Stn Plaza North, Suite 300, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[2] NYU Long Isl Sch Med, Dept Fdn Med, Div Hlth Serv Res, Biostat Core, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
关键词
Robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction; Abdominal wall hernias; Surgery; Outcomes; POSTERIOR COMPONENT SEPARATION; MUSCLE RELEASE; HERNIA REPAIRS; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-023-02774-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionRobotic abdominal wall reconstruction (RAWR) is one of the most significant advances in the management of complex abdominal wall hernias. The objective of this study was to evaluate long term outcomes in a cohort of patients that underwent complex RAWR in a single center.MethodsThis was a longitudinal retrospective review of a cohort of 56 patients who underwent complex RAWR at least 24 months prior by a single surgeon at a tertiary care institution. All patients underwent bilateral retro-rectus release (rRRR) with or without robotic transversus abdominis release (rTAR). Data collected include demographics, hernia details, operative and technical details. The prospective analysis included a post-procedure visit of at least 24 months from the index procedure with a physical examination and quality of life survey using the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS). Patients with reported symptoms concerning for hernia recurrence underwent radiographic imaging. Descriptive statistics (mean +/- standard deviation or median) were calculated for continuous variables. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test as deemed appropriate for categorical variables, and analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous data, were performed among the separate operative groups. A total score for the CCS was calculated and analyzed in accordance with the user guidelines.ResultsOne-hundred and-forty patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-six patients consented to participate in the study. Mean age was 60.2 years. Mean BMI was 34.0. Ninety percent of patients had at least one comorbidity and 52% of patients were scored ASA 3 or higher. Fifty-nine percent were initial incisional hernias, 19.6% were recurrent incisional hernias and 8.9% were recurrent ventral hernias. The mean defect width was 9 cm for rTAR and 5 cm for rRRR. The mean implanted mesh size was 945.0 cm(2) for rTAR and 362.5 cm(2) for rRRR. The mean length of follow-up was 28.1 months. Fifty-seven percent of patients underwent post-op imaging at an average follow-up of 23.5 months. Recurrence rate was 3.6% for all groups. There were no recurrences in patients that underwent solely bilateral rRRR. Two patients (7.7%) that underwent rTAR procedures were found with recurrence. Average time to recurrence was 23 months. Quality of life survey demonstrated an overall CCS score of 6.63 +/- 13.95 at 24 months with 12 (21.4%) patients reporting mesh sensation, 20 (35.7%) reporting pain, and 13 (23.2%) reporting movement limitation.ConclusionOur study contributes to the paucity of literature describing long term outcomes of RAWR. Robotic techniques offer durable repairs with acceptable quality of life metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 656
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Abdominal Myomectomy: A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes
    Barakat, Ehab E.
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    Zimberg, Stephen
    Nutter, Benjamin
    Nosseir, Mohsen
    Falcone, Tommaso
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (02): : 256 - 265
  • [42] Peri-operative outcomes of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon experience
    Shah, Ketul K.
    Thaly, Rahul K.
    Patel, Vipul R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 525 - 525
  • [43] SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED ABDOMINAL SACROCOLPOPEXY FOR THE REPAIR FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Pickens, Ryan
    Stewart, Adam
    Mobley, Joe
    Elder, Robert
    White, Wesley
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2011, 30 (02) : 269 - 269
  • [44] The learning curve for hood-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience
    Simpson, Keith R. S.
    Krishnan, Jamie
    Taylor, Linda
    Mcneill, Alan
    Good, Daniel W.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2025, 6 (01):
  • [45] Abdominal Wall Haemorrhage After Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is it a Complication of Robotic Surgery?
    Tasci, A. I.
    Simsek, A.
    Tugcu, V.
    Bitkin, A.
    Sonmezay, E.
    Torer, B. D.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2013, 37 (10): : 634 - 639
  • [46] Robotic-assisted oropharyngeal reconstruction
    Duvvuri U.
    Bonawitz S.C.
    Kim S.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (1) : 9 - 14
  • [47] ROBOTIC-ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY: OUTCOMES FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REPAIRS, A SINGLE-INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
    Thom, M.
    Chen, C.
    Haseebuddin, M.
    Roytman, T.
    Benway, B. M.
    Bhayani, S.
    Figenshau, R. S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A236 - A236
  • [48] Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair
    I. Belyansky
    H. Reza Zahiri
    Z. Sanford
    A. S. Weltz
    A. Park
    Hernia, 2018, 22 : 837 - 847
  • [49] Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair
    Belyansky, I.
    Zahiri, H. Reza
    Sanford, Z.
    Weltz, A. S.
    Park, A.
    HERNIA, 2018, 22 (05) : 837 - 847
  • [50] Long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical coronary artery revascularisation
    Dokollari, Aleksander
    Sicouri, Serge
    Erten, Ozgun
    Gray, William A.
    Shapiro, Timothy A.
    Mcgeehin, Frank
    Badri, Marwan
    Coady, Paul
    Gnall, Eric
    Caroline, Mara
    Khan, Amid A.
    Kjelstrom, Stephanie
    Montone, Georgia
    Ramlawi, Basel
    Wertan, Mary Ann
    Sutter, Francis P.
    Torregrossa, Gianluca
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2024, 20 (01) : 45 - 55