Pros and Cons in Various Immobilization Techniques and Carriers for Enzymes

被引:11
|
作者
Jiang, Yong [1 ]
Zheng, Jinxia [1 ]
Wang, Mengna [1 ]
Xu, Wanqi [1 ]
Wang, Yiquan [1 ]
Wen, Li [1 ]
Dong, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Shaoxing Univ, Coll Chem & Chem Engn, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Immobilized enzyme; Catalysis; Material; Carrier; METAL-ORGANIC FRAMEWORK; SILICA NANOPARTICLES; GLYOXYL AGAROSE; STABILIZATION; CONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; PEROXIDASE; MODULATION; ALGINATE; CATALYST;
D O I
10.1007/s12010-023-04838-7
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In recent years, enzyme immobilization technology has been developed, and studies on immobilized enzyme materials have become very prominent. With the immobilization technique, enzymes and compatible carrier materials are combined or enzyme crystals/aggregates are used in a carrier-free fashion, by physical, chemical, or biochemical methods. As a kind of biocatalyst, immobilized enzymes can catalyze certain chemical reactions with high selectivity and high efficiency under relatively mild reaction conditions and eliminate pollution to the environment. Considering the current status and applications of immobilized enzyme technology and materials emerging in the last 5 years, this mini-review introduces the advantages and disadvantages of various enzyme immobilization techniques with carriers as well as the pros and cons of different materials for immobilization. The future prospects of immobilization technology and carrier materials are outlined, aiming to provide a reference for further research and applications of sustainable technology.
引用
收藏
页码:5633 / 5655
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PROS AND CONS
    ALSTEAD, S
    LANCET, 1949, 257 (SEP10): : 490 - 490
  • [22] The pros and cons
    Jouffroy, Jean-Pierre
    PENSEE, 2013, (374): : 57 - +
  • [23] Pros and Cons
    Voas, Jeffrey
    COMPUTER, 2025, 58 (03) : 16 - 21
  • [24] Pros & Cons
    Herr, Yeek
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2011, 41 (02): : 53 - 53
  • [25] Pros cons
    Hagerman, P
    STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2001, 23 (06): : 36 - 36
  • [26] The pros and cons
    Jones, Royston
    Design Engineering (London), 2002, (JAN.):
  • [27] REACTIVE POLYMER CARRIERS FOR IMMOBILIZATION OF ENZYMES
    SCHLUNSEN, J
    MANECKE, G
    ANGEWANDTE MAKROMOLEKULARE CHEMIE, 1979, 76-7 (MAR): : 299 - 318
  • [28] FILM CARRIERS FOR IMMOBILIZATION OF ENZYMES.
    Vinogradov, E.L.
    Gavryuchenkova, L.P.
    Mal'ko, E.I.
    Zaitsev, P.I.
    Britsyna, N.S.
    Vorob'ev, V.P.
    Journal of applied chemistry of the USSR, 1985, 58 (4 pt 1): : 683 - 688
  • [29] IMMOBILIZATION OF ENZYMES ON SLOWLY SOLUBLE CARRIERS
    TORCHILIN, VP
    TISCHENKO, EG
    SMIRNOV, VN
    CHAZOV, EI
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1977, 11 (02): : 223 - 235
  • [30] PROS AND CONS OF VARIOUS PROJECT DELIVERY APPROACHES, TRADITIONAL AND OTHERWISE
    DEAN, AO
    AIA JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1976, 65 (02): : 48 - 51