Critical decisions: A mixed-methods study of decision-making among diverse gynecologic cancer patients considering therapeutic clinical trial enrollment

被引:0
|
作者
Rieder, Stephanie Margrit [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Ellen
Rutledge, Teresa [1 ]
Sussman, Andrew [2 ]
Boyce, Tawny
Pankratz, Vernon Shane
Kano, Miria [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Canc Control & Populat Sci, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Albuquerque, NM USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Dept Family & Community Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[4] Univ New Mexico, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[5] 2325 Camino Salud NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Gynecologic cancers; Health disparities; Clinical trials; Qualitative research; Intersectionality; Precarity; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; PARTICIPATION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Participation in therapeutic clinical trials does not reflect the diversity of gynecologic cancer patients, limiting access to novel therapeutics and generalizability of results. Reasons for inequities in participation among historically underrepresented populations remain undertheorized, as studies have shown equal willingness to participate among groups. We sought to apply a precarity framework to conceptualize the factors that impact patients' desire to enroll, to improve equity in gynecologic oncology clinical trial participation. Methods. Gynecologic cancer patients at a single tertiary care facility in the Southwestern United States who discussed participation in therapeutic clinical trial with their oncology provider from 2020 to 2021 were identified. Enrolled participants completed surveys and qualitative interviews regarding treatment experiences and decision -making. Oncology providers completed parallel surveys at the time of their patient's enrollment. Descriptive statistics and thematic coding were used to analyze data. Results. 30 patients were enrolled and participated in surveys and interviews. No differences were found in quantitative data assessing shared decision -making and patient -centered communication between those who enrolled and those who did not. Qualitative data demonstrated that patients who declined trial enrollment expressed concerns regarding uncertainty and loss of control, independence in decision -making, and significant resource challenges and financial toxicity of cancer treatment. Conclusions. We identified a constellation of factors that contribute to desire to enroll in clinical trials, that we describe using the framework of precarity. Through identification of precarious patients and mitigation of burdens, we anticipate improved enrollment and retention in therapeutic clinical trials among diverse gynecologic oncology patients. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Critical Decisions: A mixed-methods study investigating decision-making and disparities among diverse gynecologic cancer patients considering therapeutic clinical trial enrollment
    Rieder, Stephanie
    Burgess, Ellen
    Rutledge, Teresa
    Sussman, Andrew
    Pankratz, Vernon
    Boyce, Tawny
    Kano, Miria
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 : S11 - S12
  • [2] Clinical decision-making at the end of life: a mixed-methods study
    Taylor, Paul
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    Dowding, Dawn Wendy
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (03)
  • [3] Cancer treatment decision-making among parents of paediatric oncology patients in Guatemala: a mixed-methods study
    Graetz, Dylan E.
    Rivas, Silvia
    Wang, Huiqi
    Vedaraju, Yuvanesh
    Ferrara, Gia
    Fuentes, Lucia
    Caceres-Serrano, Ana
    Antillon-Klussmann, Federico
    Devidas, Meenakshi
    Metzger, Monika
    Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos
    Mack, Jennifer W.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [4] Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study
    Lavoie, Patrick
    Lapierre, Alexandra
    Deschenes, Marie-France
    Royere, Khiara
    Laliere, Helene
    Khetir, Imene
    Bussard, Michelle E.
    Mailhot, Tanya
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 80
  • [5] Decision-making about mastectomy among Chinese women with breast cancer: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Liu, Jing
    Hunter, Sharyn
    Guo, Dongmei
    Lin, Qin
    Zhu, Jiemin
    Lee, Regina Lai-Tong
    Chan, Sally Wai-Chi
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [6] COMMUNITY SENSITIZATION AND DECISION-MAKING FOR TRIAL PARTICIPATION: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY FROM THE GAMBIA
    Dierickx, Susan
    O'Neill, Sarah
    Gryseels, Charlotte
    Immaculate, Edna A.
    Bannister-Tyrell, Melanie
    Okebe, Joseph
    Mwesigwa, Julia
    Jaiteh, Fatou
    Gerrets, Rene
    Ravinetto, Raffaella
    D'Alessandro, Umberto
    Grietens, Koen Peeters
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2017, 97 (05): : 551 - 551
  • [7] What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study
    Santema, T. B. Katrien
    Stoffer, E. Anniek
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Koelemay, Mark J. W.
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02):
  • [8] Community sensitization and decision-making for trial participation: A mixed-methods study from The Gambia
    Dierickx, Susan
    O'Neill, Sarah
    Gryseels, Charlotte
    Anyango, Edna Immaculate
    Bannister-Tyrrell, Melanie
    Okebe, Joseph
    Mwesigwa, Julia
    Jaiteh, Fatou
    Gerrets, Rene
    Ravinetto, Raffaella
    D'Alessandro, Umberto
    Grietens, Koen Peeters
    [J]. DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (04) : 406 - 419
  • [9] Multiethnic Perspectives of Shared Decision-Making in Hypertension: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Elias, Sabrina
    Wenzel, Jennifer
    Cooper, Lisa A.
    Perrin, Nancy
    Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Koirala, Binu
    Slone, Sarah
    Byiringiro, Samuel
    Marsteller, Jill
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2024, 13 (14):
  • [10] Informed decision-making about germline testing among Veterans with advanced prostate cancer (APC): A mixed-methods study
    Kwon, Daniel H.
    McPhaul, Marissa
    Sumra, Saffanat
    Ursem, Carling Jade
    Walker, Evan Justin
    Scheuner, Maren Theresa
    Wang, Sunny
    Aggarwal, Rahul Raj
    Huang, Franklin W.
    Belkora, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)