Decision-making about mastectomy among Chinese women with breast cancer: a mixed-methods study protocol

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Jing [1 ]
Hunter, Sharyn [1 ]
Guo, Dongmei [2 ]
Lin, Qin [3 ,4 ]
Zhu, Jiemin [5 ]
Lee, Regina Lai-Tong [1 ]
Chan, Sally Wai-Chi [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Coll Hlth, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Xiamen Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Zhongshan Hosp, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Xiamen Radiotherapy Qual Control Ctr, Xiamen Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol,Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[5] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nursing, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[6] Tung Wah Coll, President Off, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
MENTAL HEALTH; Breast surgery; Adult oncology; Breast tumours; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CONSERVING SURGERY; AMERICAN WOMEN; CHOICE; INFORMATION; STATISTICS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054685
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The prevalence of mastectomy in China is higher than its Western counterparts. Little is known about whether Chinese women with breast cancer have been involved in the decision-making process of mastectomy, the level of decisional conflict, their perceptions of mastectomy and the factors that influence them to undergo a mastectomy. This protocol describes a mixed-methods study that aims to provide an in-depth understanding of decision-making about mastectomy among Chinese women with breast cancer. Methods and analysis A three-phase, sequential explanatory mixed-methods design will be adopted. The first phase is a retrospective analysis of medical records to determine the current use of mastectomy. The second phase is a cross-sectional survey to examine women's perceptions of involvement, decisional conflict and the factors influencing them to undergo a mastectomy. The third phase is an individual interview to explore women's decision-making experiences with mastectomy. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics, t-test, Fisher's exact test, chi(2) test, analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation and logistic regression. Qualitative data will be analysed by the inductive content analysis. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approvals for this study have been obtained from the human research ethics committees of the University of Newcastle, Australia, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, China, and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, China. Written informed consent will be obtained from the participants. Findings of this work will be disseminated at international conferences and peer-reviewed publications.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors influencing the implementation of shared decision-making in breast cancer care: protocol for a mixed-methods study
    Bravo, Paulina
    Dois, Angelina
    Villarroel, Luis
    Gonzalez-Agueero, Marcela
    Fernandez-Gonzalez, Loreto
    Sanchez, Cesar
    Martinez, Alejandra
    Turen, Valentina
    Quezada, Constanza
    Guasalaga, Maria Elisabeth
    Haerter, Martin
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [2] Informed decision-making about germline testing among Veterans with advanced prostate cancer (APC): A mixed-methods study
    Kwon, Daniel H.
    McPhaul, Marissa
    Sumra, Saffanat
    Ursem, Carling Jade
    Walker, Evan Justin
    Scheuner, Maren Theresa
    Wang, Sunny
    Aggarwal, Rahul Raj
    Huang, Franklin W.
    Belkora, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [3] Decision-Making Experience Related to Mastectomy Among Women With Breast Cancer An Integrative Review
    Liu, Jing
    Hunter, Sharyn
    Zhu, Jiemin
    Lee, Regina Lai Tong
    Chan, Sally Wai-Chi
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2021, 44 (06) : E670 - E686
  • [4] Cancer treatment decision-making among parents of paediatric oncology patients in Guatemala: a mixed-methods study
    Graetz, Dylan E.
    Rivas, Silvia
    Wang, Huiqi
    Vedaraju, Yuvanesh
    Ferrara, Gia
    Fuentes, Lucia
    Caceres-Serrano, Ana
    Antillon-Klussmann, Federico
    Devidas, Meenakshi
    Metzger, Monika
    Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos
    Mack, Jennifer W.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [5] Patient experience, satisfaction and shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening: protocol of the mixed-methods study CyDESA
    Selva, Anna
    Lopez, Pilar
    Puig, Teresa
    Macia, Francesc
    Selva, Clara
    Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda
    Terraza, Rebeca
    Buron, Andrea
    Machlab, Salvador Tarek
    Pericay, Carles
    Sola, Ivan
    Tora, Nuria
    Rodriguez, Vanesa
    Barrufet, Cristina
    Aymar, Anna
    Bare, Marisa
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [6] Clinical decision-making at the end of life: a mixed-methods study
    Taylor, Paul
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    Dowding, Dawn Wendy
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (03)
  • [7] Improving breast cancer outcomes for Aboriginal women: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Christie, Vita
    Rice, MacKenzie
    Dracakis, Jocelyn
    Green, Deb
    Amin, Janaki
    Littlejohn, Karen
    Pyke, Christopher
    McCowen, Debbie
    Gwynne, Kylie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [8] Decision-making about genetic testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer
    Jacobsen, PB
    Valdimarsdottir, HB
    Brown, KL
    Offit, K
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1997, 59 (05) : 459 - 466
  • [9] DECISION-MAKING ABOUT BREAST CANCER TREATMENT AMONG OLDER AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN
    Martin, S. S.
    Csikai, E. L.
    Batey, D.
    Peterson, T. L.
    Harmon, D. K.
    Broussard, C.
    Taylor, J. K.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 48 - 48
  • [10] Participation in treatment decision-making among Chinese-Australian women with breast cancer
    Cannas Kwok
    Fung Kuen Koo
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017, 25 : 957 - 963