The Effect of the Carbon Tax and the Emission Reduction Fund on Government Salience

被引:0
|
作者
Dunbar, Kirsty M. [1 ]
Wynder, Monte [2 ]
Baxter, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
[2] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
关键词
Carbon emissions; climate change mitigation; stakeholder theory; stakeholder salience; PROSPECT-THEORY; STAKEHOLDER; LEGITIMACY; FIRM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Many developed countries have committed to targets to reduce their carbon emissions under international agreements. However, a recent 2021 study found that only one country, The Gambia, is on track to meeting its Paris targets. A key mechanism for achieving these national targets is the government. Therefore, the failure of most countries to meet their targets highlights the importance of evaluating the major policy alternatives. Australia instituted a carbon pricing scheme in 2012 that was repealed in 2014 and subsequently replaced with an emissions reduction fund in 2015. This provides a unique opportunity to study the effects of these two major alternative government policies on government salience. This study applies stakeholder theory and finds that the power and urgency of both policies was weakened by uncertainty, an often-neglected factor affecting stakeholder salience. Furthermore, we note that an evaluation of government salience must also consider firm and industry differences and the effect of positively versus negatively framed interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 105
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Price Mechanism, Government Constraints and Carbon Trading Pilot Policy for Emission Reduction
    Huang, Wei
    Xue, Haili
    Zhang, Qin
    Liang, Haoguang
    DATA INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 6 (03) : 621 - 648
  • [42] Two Emission Reduction Scenarios of Single Carbon Tax or Combined With Carbon Trading and Their Impacts on National Economics
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Zhou, Jun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING (MMME 2016), 2016, 79 : 401 - 406
  • [43] Carbon tax policy-induced air travel carbon emission reduction and biofuel usage in China
    Qiu, Rui
    Xu, Jiuping
    Zeng, Ziqiang
    Chen, Xin
    Wang, Yinhai
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 103
  • [44] Bank-tax-interaction, carbon emission reduction investment and financing decisions for SMEs
    Lu, Ting
    Luo, Pengfei
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 95
  • [45] Emission reduction technologies for shipping supply chains under carbon tax with knowledge sharing
    Liu, Jiaguo
    Xu, Haonan
    Lyu, Yibing
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 246
  • [46] Revenue-Neutral Tax-Subsidy Policy for Carbon Emission Reduction.
    Galinato, Gregmar I.
    Yoder, Jonathan K.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 33 (03) : 497 - 497
  • [47] Emission reduction decision of agricultural supply chain considering carbon tax and investment cooperation
    Liu, Zheng
    Lang, Lingling
    Hu, Bin
    Shi, Lihua
    Huang, Bangtong
    Zhao, Yuanjun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 294
  • [48] Optimization strategy of cooperation and emission reduction in supply chain under carbon tax policy
    Gao, Honghu
    Liu, Shifeng
    Xing, Daning
    Cao, Guangmei
    JOURNAL OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES & CRYPTOGRAPHY, 2018, 21 (04): : 825 - 835
  • [49] Heterogeneous effect of digital economy on carbon emission reduction
    Wang, Xiangyan
    Li, Jinye
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 429
  • [50] The carbon emission reduction effect of digital agriculture in China
    Ma, Songlin
    Li, Jinfeng
    Wei, Wantong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022,