Comparative analysis of different nuclear medicine techniques in evaluation of renal function

被引:0
|
作者
Peshevska, Aleksandra [1 ]
Makazlieva, Tanja [1 ]
Majstorov, Venjamin [1 ]
Barandovski, Lambe [2 ]
Rambabova-Bushljetik, Irena [3 ]
Miladinova, Daniela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ss Cyril & Methodius, Inst Pathophysiol & Nucl Med, Fac Med, St Mother Tereza 17, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia
[2] Univ Ss Cyril & Methodius, Fac Nat Sci & Math, Inst Phys, Skopje, North Macedonia
[3] Univ Clin Nephrol, Skopje, North Macedonia
关键词
GFR; Tc-99m]Tc-DTPA; plasma sampling; slope-intercept method; Fleming's single sample method; Gates method Nucl Med Rev 2023; 26; 85-95; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; SINGLE PLASMA SAMPLE; CLEARANCE; INJECTION; ACETATE; GFR;
D O I
10.5603/NMR.2023.0011
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Nuclear medicine (NM) methods play an important role in the evaluation of renal function in a wide range of clinical indications. The aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation between measured GFR (mGFR) obtained by the three-plasma sample slope-intercept NM method (TPSM) - reference method vs. estimated GFR (eGFR) using Fleming's single plasma sample method (SPSM) at 120 min, 180 min, and 240 min and correlation of reference method with eGFR with camera-based Gates' protocol.Material and methods: A total of 82 subjects (33 male/49 female) with a mean age of 54.87 +/- 15.65 years were included and mGFR value was obtained by the three-plasma sample slope-intercept NM method and eGFR was obtained with Fleming's single sample method. eGFR was also quantified with the camera-based Gates' protocol after i.v. application of [Tc-99m]Tc-DTPA.Results: Our study revealed a very strong positive significant correlation between all three SPSMs with the TPSM as the reference method. Between the Gates' method and the TPSM in the group of patients with mGFR >= 61-84 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and mGFR >= 84 mL/min/1.73 m2, a moderate positive statistically significant correlation was obtained.Conclusions: The SPSM method shows a very strong correlation with the reference and low bias in all three groups of patients and can be routinely used for GFR estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RENAL NUCLEAR-MEDICINE
    FOMMEI, E
    VOLTERRANI, D
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (02) : 183 - 194
  • [42] Renal diagnosis by nuclear medicine
    Haufe, S
    Clorius, JH
    RADIOLOGE, 1999, 39 (05): : 386 - 397
  • [43] Renal nuclear medicine: A review
    Daniel, GB
    Mitchell, SK
    Mawby, D
    Sackman, JE
    Schmidt, D
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 1999, 40 (06) : 572 - 587
  • [44] PITFALLS IN EVALUATION OF RENAL-FUNCTION BY SINGLE SAMPLE TECHNIQUES
    CHATTERTON, BE
    COLLINS, PJ
    COOK, DJ
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 8 (04): : 461 - 461
  • [45] Comparative evaluation of different classification techniques for masquerade attack detection
    Elmasry W.
    Akbulut A.
    Zaim A.H.
    International Journal of Information and Computer Security, 2020, 13 (02) : 187 - 209
  • [46] Comparative Evaluation of Drilling on GFRP Made by Different Fabrication Techniques
    Raja, R.
    Jannet, Sabitha
    ADVANCES IN UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING AND COMPOSITES, AIMTDR 2018, 2020, : 583 - 597
  • [47] Different Medical Image Registration Techniques: A Comparative Analysis
    Karthick, Suyambu
    Maniraj, S.
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 15 (10) : 911 - 921
  • [48] Comparative analysis of Contrast Enhancement Techniques on different Images
    Raj, Deepa
    Mamoria, Pushpa
    2015 International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT), 2015, : 27 - 31
  • [49] A comparative performance analysis of different machine learning techniques
    Ialithabhavani, B.
    Krishnaveni, G.
    Malathi, J.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND MACHINE LEARNING, 2019, 1228
  • [50] Comparative analysis of silymarin using different extraction techniques
    Hlangothi, Duma
    Anthony, Kevin
    Saleh, Mahmoud
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255