Challenges and difficulties in diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma

被引:0
|
作者
Metwally, Islam [1 ]
Bahgat, Mostafa [2 ]
El-Shahed, Ahmed [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Helwan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Helwan Univ, Ophthalmol Dept, Dept Ophthalmol, 4 Tahran Sq, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
glaucoma; open angle glaucoma; normal-tension glaucoma; NERVE-FIBER LAYER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; GANGLION-CELL; PREVALENCE; PERIMETRY;
D O I
10.4103/ejos.ejos_30_23
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
AimThe aim of this study is to clinically investigate the challenges and pitfalls of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) diagnostic methods by ophthalmic clinical and investigative examinations. SettingThis study was conducted at Al-Agouza Police Authority Hospital and Badr University Hospital.MethodsA cross-sectional comparative study between the diagnosis of normal nonglaucoma patients and NTG. It included 40 normal nonglaucoma patients' eyes as controls and 40 NTG patients' eyes who met inclusion criteria. They were assessed by a complete ophthalmic exam., visual field (VF), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) variables between January 2022 and September 2022.ResultsThe median age of the control group was 38 years old, while that of glaucomatous patients was 41 years old. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) for the normal group was 15.53 mmHg (+/- 1.935), while that for the glaucomatous group was 16.85 mmHg (+/- 1.703). The intraocular pressure was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0017).The mean deviation (MD) in dB of VF loss was considerably higher in the NTG group compared with the control (P = 0.0001). Also, the mean standard deviation (MSD) was considerably varied between the two groups (P < 0.0001).The average Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) in the NTG group, with a mean of 72.3 & Otilde;<1/2>m (+/- 10.239) was significantly lower than in the control group with a mean of 102.025 & Otilde;1/2m (+/- 7.454), P = 0.0001.Optic Disc Parameters: The Cup Area (mm(2)) was significantly wider in the NTG group with a mean of 1.62 (+/- 0.476) than in the control with a mean of 1.297 (+/- 0.44), P = 0.0024. Also, the Rim Area was significantly smaller in the NTG group with a mean of 0.614 (+/- 0.342) than in the control with a mean of 1.135 (+/- 0.319), P = 0.0024. The Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger in the NTG group than in the control group (P < 0.0001).The average Ganglion cell complex (GCC) was considerably thinner in the NTG patients in comparison to the controls (P = 0.0001).ConclusionThe effects of NTG on VF and optic nerve seems to be more intensive. More focal notches and disc hemorrhage were noted in NTG. In the NTG group, the Cup Area was potentially wider, the rim area was significantly thinner, and the Cup/disc ratio was significantly larger.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 144
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selected autoantibodies and normal-tension glaucoma
    Skonieczna, Katarzyna
    Grabska-Liberek, Iwona
    Terelak-Borys, Barbara
    Jamrozy-Witkowska, Agnieszka
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2014, 20 : 1201 - 1209
  • [22] Therapeutic strategies for normal-tension glaucoma
    Orgül, S
    Zawinka, C
    Gugleta, K
    Flammer, J
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2005, 219 (06) : 317 - 323
  • [23] Collaborative normal-tension glaucoma study
    Sommer, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 128 (06) : 776 - 777
  • [24] NORMAL-TENSION GLAUCOMA - A DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE
    MEIERGIBBONS, F
    STURMER, J
    GLOOR, B
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1995, 206 (03) : 157 - 160
  • [25] Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma
    Alward, WLM
    Feldman, F
    Trope, G
    Cashwell, LF
    Wilensky, J
    Geijssen, HC
    Greeve, E
    Quigley, H
    Jampel, H
    Skuta, G
    Lichter, PR
    Blondeau, P
    Anderson, DR
    Grajewski, A
    Hodapp, E
    Balazsi, G
    Amyot, M
    Desjardins, DC
    Levene, RZ
    Minckler, D
    Heuer, D
    Drance, SM
    Mikelberg, F
    Douglas, G
    Johnstone, M
    Hetherington, J
    Hoskins, HD
    Pollack, IP
    Abrams, D
    Mills, R
    Kasner, OP
    Schwartz, A
    Liebmann, J
    Ritch, R
    Cohen, J
    Tuulonen, A
    Airaksinen, PJ
    Schulzer, M
    Anderson, DR
    Drance, SM
    Clarkson, J
    Litinsky, S
    Hardy, R
    Schiffman, J
    Rose, A
    Neaton, J
    Drance, SM
    Schulzer, M
    Anderson, DR
    Steele, T
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (02) : 247 - 253
  • [26] The multifocal electroretinogram in normal-tension glaucoma
    Asano, E
    Mochizuki, K
    Kondo, Y
    Sawada, A
    Yamamoto, T
    Nagasaka, E
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U508 - U508
  • [27] Treatment of progressive normal-tension glaucoma
    Werner, EB
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 1997, 6 (06) : 408 - 411
  • [28] THERAPEUTIC ASPECTS OF NORMAL-TENSION GLAUCOMA
    FLAMMER, J
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 4 (02) : 58 - 64
  • [29] ERRORS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF VISUAL-FIELD PROGRESSION IN NORMAL-TENSION GLAUCOMA
    SCHULZER, M
    AIRAKSINEN, PJ
    ALWARD, WL
    AMYOT, M
    ANDERSON, DR
    BALAZSI, G
    BLONDEAU, P
    CASHWELL, LF
    COHEN, JS
    DESJARDINS, D
    DICKENS, C
    DOUGLAS, GR
    DRANCE, SM
    FELDMAN, F
    GEIJSSEN, HC
    GRAJEWSKI, A
    GREVE, E
    HETHERINGTON, J
    HEUER, D
    HODAPP, E
    HOSKINS, HD
    IWACH, A
    JAMPEL, H
    KASNER, O
    KITAZAWA, Y
    KOMULAINEN, R
    LEVENE, R
    LIEBMANN, J
    MIKELBERG, FS
    MILLS, R
    MINCKLER, D
    MOTOLKO, M
    PERKINS, T
    POLLOCK, I
    QUIGLEY, H
    RITCH, R
    ROSANELLI, EG
    SCHWARTZ, A
    SHIRATO, S
    TOMITA, G
    TROPE, G
    TUULONEN, A
    WILENSKY, J
    CLARKSON, JG
    HARDY, R
    LITINSKY, S
    ROSE, AW
    SCHIFFMAN, J
    STEELE, T
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 101 (09) : 1589 - 1594
  • [30] Hemorrhage of the optic disk in normal-tension glaucoma
    Shields, MB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (06) : 796 - 797