The Effects of Interactive Virtual Reality in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Kantha, Phunsuk [1 ]
Lin, Jiu-Jenq [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, Wei-Li [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch & Grad Inst Phys Therapy, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Phys Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Phys Therapy Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch & Grad Inst Phys Therapy, Coll Med, Room 326,Floor 3,17 Xuzhou Rd Zhongzheng, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
Virtual reality; Pain; Psychological distress; Functional disability; Chronic musculoskeletal disorders; LOW-BACK-PAIN; EXERCISE THERAPY; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1089/g4h.2022.0088
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Interactive virtual reality (iVR) has been widely used for treatment purposes in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. However, no consensus has been reached on the effects of iVR on pain, psychological distress, and functional disability. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of iVR on pain, psychological distress, and functional disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders compared with no rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation.Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were searched from January 2016 to December 2021. All randomized controlled trials using iVR for treating pain, psychological distress, and functional disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders were included. A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the effects of nonimmersive and immersive types of iVR on the outcomes of interest.Results: Our study provides good quality evidence that iVR reduced overall pain by 9.28 points as compared with no rehabilitation and by 8.09 points as compared with conventional rehabilitation. In the subgroup analysis, nonimmersive iVR showed a reduction in psychological distress (standardized mean differences = -0.35) as compared with no rehabilitation. However, no statistically significant difference in the outcomes existed between nonimmersive and immersive iVR. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes of functional disability.Conclusions: iVR is recommended for reducing pain intensity more than no rehabilitation or conventional rehabilitation. Meanwhile, nonimmersive iVR has been proposed for psychological distress improvement, with effects similar to those of conventional rehabilitation. However, iVR may not be an effective intervention in the case of functional disability.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk of Atopic Disorders in Patients with Chronic Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Ditte Georgina
    Zahid, Jawad Ahmad
    Ali, Zarqa
    Thomsen, Simon Francis
    [J]. DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 239 (01) : 32 - 44
  • [42] Evoking stress reactivity in virtual reality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    McCurdy, Bethany H.
    van Dammen, Lotte
    Finseth, Tor T.
    Barnett, Neil P.
    Conrady, Roselynn
    Leach, Alexis G.
    Deick, Andrew F.
    Van Steenis, Allissa
    Gardner, Reece
    Smith, Brandon
    Kay, Anita
    Shirtcliff, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 131 : S12 - S13
  • [43] Is Virtual Reality Effective in Orthopedic Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gumaa, Mohammed
    Youssef, Aliaa Rehan
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 99 (10): : 1304 - 1325
  • [44] Evoking stress reactivity in virtual reality: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van Dammen, Lotte
    Finseth, Tor T.
    McCurdy, Bethany H.
    Barnett, Neil P.
    Conrady, Roselynn A.
    Leach, Alexis G.
    Deick, Andrew F.
    Van Steenis, Allissa L.
    Gardner, Reece
    Smith, Brandon L.
    Kay, Anita
    Shirtcliff, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2022, 138
  • [45] Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review & meta-analysis
    Alaker, Medhat
    Wynn, Greg R.
    Arulampalam, Tan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 29 : 85 - 94
  • [46] Changing social attitudes with virtual reality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nikolaou, A.
    Schwabe, A.
    Boomgaarden, H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, 2022, 46 (01) : 30 - 61
  • [47] Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Kai
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Li, Wei
    Wang, Ting
    Zheng, Yanxue
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [48] Validity and Reliability of Interactive Virtual Reality in Assessing the Musculoskeletal System: a Systematic Review
    Mohammed Gumaa
    Alaaeldin Khaireldin
    Aliaa Rehan Youssef
    [J]. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2021, 14 : 130 - 144
  • [49] Virtual reality for safety training: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Scorgie, D.
    Feng, Z.
    Paes, D.
    Parisi, F.
    Yiu, T. W.
    Lovreglio, R.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2024, 171
  • [50] Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Healthcare Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sung, Hyunkyung
    Kim, Mikyung
    Park, Jangkyung
    Shin, Namin
    Han, Yejin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (19)