Biomechanical Comparison of Coracoclavicular Fixation Using Metallic Versus All-Suture Anchors

被引:0
|
作者
Hong, Chih-Kai [1 ]
Kuan, Fa-Chuan [1 ]
Hsu, Kai-Lan [1 ]
Chen, Yueh [1 ,3 ]
Chiang, Chen-Hao [1 ,4 ]
Su, Wei-Ren [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 138 Sheng Li Rd, Tainan 704302, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tainan Branch, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Chia Yi Christian Hosp, Ditmanson Med Fdn, Dept Orthopaed, Chiayi, Taiwan
[5] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Innovat Headquarter, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
all-suture anchor; biomechanics; coracoclavicular; metallic anchor;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231222505
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:A coracoclavicular (CC) fixation technique using an all-suture anchor with the assistance of fluoroscopy can prevent iatrogenic anterior deltoid detachment from the clavicle; however, soft anchor pullout has been reported as a complication.Purpose:To compare the biomechanical properties of conventional metallic and all-suture anchors for CC suture fixation.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:A total of 24 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were divided into 2 groups: metal anchor group (group M) and all-suture anchor group (group A). In group M, 5.0-mm metallic suture anchors were used for CC fixation, whereas 2.8-mm all-suture anchors were used in group A. The prepared specimens were mounted on a materials testing machine. After preconditioning at 0 to 20 N for 10 cycles, the specimens were subjected to cyclic loading from 20 to 70 N for 1000 cycles. Finally, all the specimens were loaded to failure. Cyclic elongation, linear stiffness, ultimate load, and failure modes were recorded, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare nonparametric parameters between the 2 groups.Results:All of the specimens completed the cyclic loading test. The elongation after cyclic loading in group M (1.6 +/- 0.6 mm) was significantly smaller compared with that in group A (2.5 +/- 1.2 mm) (P = .02). No between-group differences were found in linear stiffness (42 +/- 17 N/mm in group M and 41 +/- 17 N/mm in group A). The ultimate failure load in group M (263 +/- 66 N) was significantly greater than that in group A (177 +/- 76 N) (P = .02). All specimens failed because of suture anchor pullout.Conclusion:The use of all-suture anchors in CC fixation resulted in significantly greater cyclic displacement and smaller ultimate failure load than that of metallic anchors.Clinical Relevance:Understanding the most biomechanically sound suture anchor may assist in lowering the risk of clinical failure in CC fixation and repair.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Fixation Technique Using Multiple All-Suture Anchors
    Jeong, Jeung Yeol
    Yoo, Yon-Sik
    Lee, Seung-Jin
    Im, Wooyoung
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (04): : E423 - E427
  • [2] Biomechanical Comparison of Onlay Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: All-Suture Anchors Versus Titanium Suture Anchors
    Otto, Alexander
    Mehl, Julian
    Obopilwe, Elifho
    Cote, Mark
    Lacheta, Lucca
    Scheiderer, Bastian
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Mazzocca, Augustus D.
    Siebenlist, Sebastian
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (10): : 2478 - 2483
  • [3] Biomechanical Comparison of Knotless All-Suture Anchors and Knotted All-Suture Anchors in Type II SLAP Lesions: A Cadaveric Study
    Nolte, Philip-C.
    Midtgaard, Kaare S.
    Ciccotti, Michael
    Miles, Jon W.
    Tanghe, Kira K.
    Lacheta, Lucca
    Millett, Peter J.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (08): : 2094 - 2102
  • [4] Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Bernardoni, Eamon D.
    Veera, Shreya S.
    Waterman, Brian R.
    Griffin, Justin W.
    Shewman, Elizabeth F.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (06): : 1760 - 1768
  • [5] Editorial Commentary: All-Suture Anchors, Foam Blocks, and Biomechanical Testing
    Brand, Jefferson C.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (06): : 1122 - 1123
  • [6] Comparison of all-suture anchors with metallic anchors in arthroscopic cuff repair: Structural and functional properties and clinical suitability
    Piatti, Massimiliano
    Gorla, Massimo
    Alberio, Federico
    Omeljaniuk, Robert J.
    Rigamonti, Luca
    Gaddi, Diego
    Turati, Marco
    Bigoni, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 39 : 66 - 69
  • [7] BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THE CORACOCLAVICULAR SPACE FIXATION USING THREE DIFFERENT SUTURE TECHNIQUES
    Griskevicius, Julius
    Sesok, Andzela
    Mizeras, Deividas
    Masionis, Povilas
    Ryliskis, Sigitas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 16 (04)
  • [8] Arthroscopic Remplissage Using Knotless, All-Suture Anchors
    McQuivey, Kade S.
    Brinkman, Joseph C.
    Tummala, Sailesh, V
    Shaha, James S.
    Tokish, John M.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2022, 11 (04): : E615 - E621
  • [9] Biomechanical comparison of traditional anchors to all-suture anchors in a double-row rotator cuff repair cadaver model
    Goschka, Andrew M.
    Hafer, Jason S.
    Reynolds, Kirk A.
    Aberle, Nicholas S., II
    Baldini, Todd H.
    Hawkins, Monica J.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 30 (08) : 808 - 813
  • [10] All-Suture Anchors: Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strength, Displacement, and Failure Mode
    Barber, F. Alan
    Herbert, Morley A.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (06): : 1113 - 1121