Anterior to Psoas Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Jui-Feng [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Cheng-Chia [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Yu-Chuen [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Chih-Chuan [1 ,6 ]
Chen, Yu-Jen [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Tradit Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] MacKay Med Coll, Dept Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, Coll Chinese Med, Sch Chinese Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] MacKay Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
anterior to psoas; MI-TLIF; CBT; interbody fusion; LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; DECOMPRESSION; COMPLICATIONS; POSTERIOR; OUTCOMES; SPINE;
D O I
10.6890/IJGE.202304_17(2).0010
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between an anterior to psoas (ATP) ap-proach combined with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) fixation (ATP group) and minimally invasive trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) combined with CBT fixation (MI-TLIF group) for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease and instability. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent interbody fusion and internal fixa-tion between May 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, using the ATP or MI-TLIF approach to treat degen-erative lumbar disc disease and instability. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) results, blood loss, operation time, complications, and bony fusion were analyzed and compared to understand clinical outcomes. Clinical and radiologic follow-up for all patients was at least 12 months. Results: The ATP approach combined with CBT fixation resulted in less blood loss, earlier reduced VAS scores, better ODI scores, but longer operation time. At 12 months, the fusion rates in the ATP and MI-TLIF groups were 90% (18/20) and 72% (13/18), respectively. Conclusion: Our results show that the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation had the advantage of less blood loss, earlier recovery in VAS scores, and better ODI than in MI-TLIF. Indirect and direct de-compression could be successfully integrated by the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation and laminectomy.Copyright (c) 2023, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 134
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
    Xie, Tianhang
    Wang, Chaoyang
    Yang, Zhiqiang
    Xiu, Peng
    Yang, Xi
    Wang, Xiandi
    Wang, Duan
    Song, Yueming
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 135 : e671 - e678
  • [42] Letter to the editor regarding "Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis"
    Miller, Larry E.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [43] Minimally invasive anterior oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease
    Ye, Jia-Hui
    Ding, Jia-Ling
    Xiang, Zi-Yue
    Zhu, Si-Pin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 43 (12) : 1214 - 1215
  • [44] Letter to the editor regarding “Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis”
    Larry E. Miller
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14
  • [45] Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Tang, Guo-qing
    Han, Xiao
    Xing, Yong-gang
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 2093 - 2101
  • [46] Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Jiang, Xijia
    Xu, Nanwei
    Nong, Luming
    Jiang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [47] Minimally Invasive Decompression With Noninstrumented Facet Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Stenosis Associated With Grade 1 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Daniel C.
    Laskay, Nicholas
    Alcala, Christopher
    Schwender, James
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (10): : E416 - E422
  • [48] Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Yu, Bin
    Zhang, Jin
    Pan, Jie
    Wang, Yizhou
    Chen, YingGao
    Zhao, Weidong
    Wu, Desheng
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1213 - 1226
  • [49] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for dual-segment lower lumbar degenerative disease
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Zhangfu
    Hong, Zhenghua
    Chen, Haixiao
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2018, 13 (04) : 525 - 532
  • [50] Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Bovonratwet, Patawut
    Samuel, Andre M.
    Mok, Jung Kee
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Morse, Kyle W.
    Song, Junho
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Jordan, Yusef J.
    Gang, Catherine H.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (21) : 1505 - 1514