Performance evaluation of sustainability in a textile firm via multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:0
|
作者
Gonca, Simsek Guenduez [1 ]
Cagdas, Guenduez [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Denizli Vocat Sch Tech Sci, Dept Text Technol, TR-20160 Denizli, Turkiye
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Appl Sci, Dept Capital Market, TR-20600 Denizli, Turkiye
来源
INDUSTRIA TEXTILA | 2023年 / 74卷 / 04期
关键词
sustainability; environmental indicators; performance evaluation; TOPSIS; textile; TOPSIS; SELECTION; INDUSTRY; POLICY;
D O I
10.35530/IT.074.04.202270
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
Today, the sustainability approach is an integral part of business life. Especially, considering the damage that various events can cause to the environment, environmental sustainability (ES) is getting much more attention. From this aspect, the textile industry which can cause serious environmental damage, should integrate a sustainability approach into its management concept. Therefore, decision-makers and practitioners need to evaluate the sustainability performance of the industry. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods help them to evaluate sustainability performance usefully. This paper evaluates the sustainability performance of a selected company in the textile industry over the years by environmental performance indicators. The technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodology is used to evaluate sustainability performance.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [32] APPLICATIONS OF WASPAS METHOD AS A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (01): : 5 - 22
  • [33] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [34] A Novel Method for Clustering in WSNs via TOPSIS Multi-criteria Decision-Making Algorithm
    Ahmad Shelebaf
    Shayesteh Tabatabaei
    Wireless Personal Communications, 2020, 112 : 985 - 1001
  • [35] A Novel Method for Clustering in WSNs via TOPSIS Multi-criteria Decision-Making Algorithm
    Shelebaf, Ahmad
    Tabatabaei, Shayesteh
    WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 112 (02) : 985 - 1001
  • [36] Integration of multi-criteria decision-making for performance evaluation of different solar batteries technologies
    Imen Azzouz
    Inès Hammami
    Kais Brik
    Faouzi Ben Ammar
    Electrical Engineering, 2023, 105 : 775 - 795
  • [37] Evaluation of Sports Center Performance Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Wang, Chen-Yang
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2015, 43 (06) : 1372 - 1382
  • [38] Integration of multi-criteria decision-making for performance evaluation of different solar batteries technologies
    Azzouz, Imen
    Hammami, Ines
    Brik, Kais
    Ben Ammar, Faouzi
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 105 (02) : 775 - 795
  • [39] Evaluation of Scholarly Performance Student Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Objective Weight
    Wati, Masna
    Novirasari, Niken
    Pakpahan, Herman Santoso
    2018 INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONICS SYMPOSIUM ON KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND INTELLIGENT COMPUTING (IES-KCIC), 2018, : 56 - 61
  • [40] Assessment of urban surface performance of open spaces with multi-criteria decision-making method
    Serdar Yakut, Elif Safiye
    Cenani, Sehnaz
    Cagdas, Gulen
    MEGARON, 2022, 17 (04): : 658 - 672