ChatGPT for assessment writing

被引:30
|
作者
Zuckerman, Matthew [1 ,4 ]
Flood, Ryan [1 ]
Tan, Rachael J. B. [1 ]
Kelp, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Ecker, David J. [1 ]
Menke, Jonathan [1 ]
Lockspeiser, Tai [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Campus, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Pathol, Ft Collins, CO USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Dept Pediat, Aurora, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado Denver, Sch Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
Assessment; artificial intelligence; AI; ChatGPT; medical education;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2023.2249239
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
What is the educational challenge?Medical schools invest significant resources into the creation of multiple-choice items for assessments. This process is costly and requires faculty training. Recently ChatGPT has been used in various areas to improve content creation efficiency, and it has otherwise been used to answer USMLE-style assessment items.What are the proposed solutions?We proposed the use of ChatGPT to create initial drafts of multiple-choice items.What are the potential benefits to a wider global audience?The use of ChatGPT to generate assessment items can decrease resources required, allowing for the creation of more items, and freeing-up faculty time to perform higher level assessment activities. ChatGPT is also able to consistently produce items using a standard format while adhering to item writing guidelines, which can be very challenging for faculty teams.What are the next steps?We plan to pilot ChatGPT drafted questions and compare item statistics for those written by ChatGPT with those written by our content experts. We also plan to further identify the types of questions that ChatGPT is most appropriate for, and incorporate media into assessment items (e.g. images, videos).
引用
收藏
页码:1224 / 1227
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ChatGPT: a tool for scientific writing or a threat to integrity?
    Silva, Thaisa Pinheiro
    Ocampo, Thais S. C.
    Alencar-Palha, Caio
    Oliveira-Santos, Christiano
    Takeshita, Wilton Mitsunari
    Oliveira, Matheus L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 96 (1152):
  • [42] ChatGPT and scientific writing: A reflection on the ethical boundaries
    Ocampo, Thais Santos Cerqueira
    Silva, Thaisa Pinheiro
    Alencar-Palha, Caio
    Haiter-Neto, Francisco
    Oliveira, Matheus L.
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2023, 53 (02) : 175 - 176
  • [43] ChatGPT and scientific abstract writing: pitfalls and caution
    Ali, Mohammad Javed
    Singh, Swati
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (11) : 3205 - 3206
  • [44] ChatGPT and scientific abstract writing: pitfalls and caution
    Mohammad Javed Ali
    Swati Singh
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2023, 261 : 3205 - 3206
  • [45] Beyond the Keyboard: Academic Writing in the Era of ChatGPT
    Doskaliuk, Bohdana
    Zimba, Olena
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (26)
  • [46] The impact of using ChatGPT on EFL students' writing
    Xu, Jie
    Gao, Jie
    Gong, Xin
    Shadiev, Rustam
    Li, Yan
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, ICALT 2024, 2024, : 126 - 128
  • [47] ChatGPT use should be prohibited in writing letters
    Matsubara, Shigeki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 231 (03) : 110 - 110
  • [48] ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing
    Teng, Mark Feng
    Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 7
  • [49] Comment on 'ChatGPT and medical writing in dermatology: why should we keep writing?'
    Daungsupawong, Hineptch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 49 (08) : 930 - 930
  • [50] Second language writing anxiety and ChatGPT adoption as an automated writing evaluation tool
    Liu, Zhifang
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024,