Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial

被引:0
|
作者
Nguyen, Paul V. [1 ,2 ]
Donneaux, Bertrand [2 ]
Louis, Celine [2 ]
Bodgal, Zsuzsa [2 ]
Philippi, Sven [2 ]
Biver, Sylvie [2 ]
Frederick, Berangere [2 ]
Harze, Ludovic [2 ]
Lasar, Yves [3 ]
Vogin, Guillaume [2 ]
Nickers, Philippe [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CHU UCL Namur Site St Elisabeth, Dept Radiotherapy, Namur, Belgium
[2] Ctr Francois Baclesse, Dept Radiotherapy, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[3] Emile Mayrisch Hosp, Dept Radiol, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[4] CHU Liege, Dept Radiotherapy, Ave Hop 1, Liege, Belgium
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
prostate cancer; stereotactic radiation; SBRT; focal therapies for prostate cancer; morbidity; Phase II trial; focal radiotherapy; focal SBRT; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; THERAPY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IntroductionSince radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. MethodsPatients were recruited in 2016-2019 if they had: localized CAPRA <= 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS >= 4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with >= 1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade >= 3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). ConclusionFocal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stereotactic body radiation therapy for small (≤5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to curative treatment: Results of a single-arm, phase II clinical trial
    Yoon, Sang Min
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lim, Young-Suk
    Kim, Kang Mo
    Shim, Ju Hyun
    Lee, Danbi
    An, Jihyun
    Jung, Jinhong
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Lee, Han Chu
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 26 (04) : 506 - 515
  • [42] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Toxicity Results of a Phase 2 Trial
    Kishan, A. U.
    Fuller, D. B.
    Steinberg, M. L.
    Ramirez, V.
    Ostendorf, E.
    Tsai, S. H.
    Agazaryan, N.
    Ruan, D.
    Cao, M.
    Kupelian, P. A.
    King, C. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E248 - E248
  • [43] Progression-Directed Therapy in Oligoprogressive Castration-Refractory Prostate Cancer: Results of the Prospective Single-Arm Phase II MEDCARE Trial
    Rans, K.
    Berghen, C.
    Joniau, S.
    Goffin, K.
    De Roover, R.
    De Meerleer, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : S26 - S27
  • [44] Safety and anti-tumor effects of vismodegib in patients with refractory advanced gastric cancer: A single-arm phase-II trial
    Kim, Ryul
    Ji, Jun Ho
    Kim, Jung Hoon
    Hong, Jung Yong
    Lim, Ho-Yeong
    Kang, Won Ki
    Lee, Jeeyun
    Kim, Seung Tae
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 13 (03): : 1097 - 1102
  • [45] Ridaforolimus as a single agent in advanced endometrial cancer: results of a single-arm, phase 2 trial
    Colombo, N.
    McMeekin, D. S.
    Schwartz, P. E.
    Sessa, C.
    Gehrig, P. A.
    Holloway, R.
    Braly, P.
    Matei, D.
    Morosky, A.
    Dodion, P. F.
    Einstein, M. H.
    Haluska, F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (05) : 1021 - 1026
  • [46] Ridaforolimus as a single agent in advanced endometrial cancer: results of a single-arm, phase 2 trial
    N Colombo
    D S McMeekin
    P E Schwartz
    C Sessa
    P A Gehrig
    R Holloway
    P Braly
    D Matei
    A Morosky
    P F Dodion
    M H Einstein
    F Haluska
    British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108 : 1021 - 1026
  • [47] ONE SHOT - single shot radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: 18-month results of a single arm, multicenter phase I/II trial
    Zilli, Thomas
    Franzese, Ciro
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Giaj-Levra, Niccolo
    Mach, Nicolas
    Koutsouvelis, Nikolaos
    Achard, Verane
    Mcdonald, Andrew
    Alongi, Filippo
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Constantin, Guillaume
    Bertaut, Aurelie
    Miralbell, Raymond
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194
  • [48] Weekly ascorbic acid infusion in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a single-arm phase II trial
    Nielsen, Torben K.
    Hojgaard, Martin
    Andersen, Jon T.
    Jorgensen, Niklas Rye
    Zerahn, Bo
    Kristensen, Bent
    Henriksen, Trine
    Lykkesfeldt, Jens
    Mikines, Kari J.
    Poulsen, Henrik E.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 517 - 528
  • [49] Correction to: NEAR trial: A single-arm phase II trial of neoadjuvant apalutamide monotherapy and radical prostatectomy in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer
    Lui Shiong Lee
    Adelene Y. L. Sim
    Chee Wee Ong
    Xinyan Yang
    Cedric C. Y. Ng
    Wei Liu
    Vikneswari Rajasegaran
    Abner M. S. Lim
    Edwin Jonathan Aslim
    Nye-Thane Ngo
    Li-Yan Khor
    Ravindran Kanesvaran
    John Carson Jr Allen
    Kae Jack Tay
    John Shyi Peng Yuen
    Tsung Wen Chong
    Sun Sien Henry Ho
    Bin Tean Teh
    Melvin L. K. Chua
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2022, 25 : 803 - 803
  • [50] Which is the most appropriate treatment modality in the radiotherapy of low-risk prostate cancer?
    Froehlich, G.
    Agoston, P.
    Jorgo, K.
    Stelczer, G.
    Polgar, C.
    Takacsi-Nagy, Z.
    Major, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S495 - S496