prostate cancer;
stereotactic radiation;
SBRT;
focal therapies for prostate cancer;
morbidity;
Phase II trial;
focal radiotherapy;
focal SBRT;
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE;
THERAPY;
OUTCOMES;
SURGERY;
D O I:
10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
IntroductionSince radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. MethodsPatients were recruited in 2016-2019 if they had: localized CAPRA <= 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS >= 4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with >= 1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade >= 3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). ConclusionFocal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance.
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
King, Christopher
IMRT IGRT SBRT- ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY,
2011,
43
: 428
-
437
机构:
St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Biostat, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN 38105 USASt Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Biostat, 262 Danny Thomas Pl, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
机构:
Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
Berends, Joel
Dupati, Ajith
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
Dupati, Ajith
Dibianco, John
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
Dibianco, John
George, Arvin K.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA