Does Increasing Farm Plot Size Influence the Visual Quality of Everyday Agricultural Landscapes?

被引:2
|
作者
Molnarova, Kristina Janeckova [1 ]
Bohnet, Iris C. [1 ]
Svobodova, Kamila [1 ,2 ]
Pixova, Katerina Cerny [1 ]
Daniels, Michael [3 ]
Skalos, Jan [4 ]
Drhlikova, Kristyna [1 ]
Azadi, Hossein [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Zamecnik, Roman [7 ]
Sklenicka, Petr [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Environm Sci, Dept Landscape & Urban Planning, Kamycka 129, Prague 16500, Suchdol, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Denver, Dept Geog & Environm, Denver, CO 80210 USA
[4] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Environm Sci, Dept Appl Ecol, Kamycka 129, Prague 16500, Suchdol, Czech Republic
[5] Univ Liege, Dept Econ & Rural Dev, Gembloux Agrobio Tech, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[6] Babes Bolyai Univ, Fac Environm Sci & Engn, Cluj Napoca 400000, Romania
[7] Mendel Univ Brno, Fac Hort, Dept Planting Design & Maintenance, Valticka 337, Lednice 69144, Czech Republic
关键词
landscape aesthetics; spatial heterogeneity; agricultural landscape; land systems; land-use policy; RURAL LANDSCAPES; OWNERSHIP FRAGMENTATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SCENIC BEAUTY; PREFERENCES; LAND; HETEROGENEITY; CONSERVATION; PERCEPTION; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph20010687
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increase in farm plot size is one of the most apparent and significant trends that have influenced central and eastern European agricultural landscapes since the 1950s. In many countries where the average plot size in traditional land-use systems did not exceed several hectares, present-day plots reach the size of 200 ha or more. In recent times, efforts have been made to reverse this trend to restore important ecosystem functions and to re-establish the aesthetic values of everyday landscapes. Visual landscape quality is becoming a major driving force in the development of agricultural landscapes with known effects on people's well-being and health, and this quality plays an increasingly important role in agricultural policies. However, no comprehensive research has been carried out to establish the links between perceived visual landscape quality and the scale of the farm plot pattern. The current study was therefore designed to determine whether greater farmland pattern heterogeneity, i.e., smaller farm plot sizes, is consistent with higher visual preferences. The results showed that people preferred a small-scale plot pattern in landscapes characterized by a flat relief and a low proportion of woody vegetation. These homogeneous landscapes were also overall considered significantly less beautiful than more diverse landscapes. However, even a moderate decrease in plot size notably improved these low beauty scores. These preferences were displayed consistently by all respondents, and most strongly by older respondents, respondents with a higher level of education, and those professionally engaged in landscape design or conservation. The high level of consensus among respondents in rejecting further land consolidation in homogeneous landscapes, which form a large proportion of European farmland, underlines that the results of this study provide a valid argument for discussing sustainable agricultural plot sizes as part of agricultural policy-making.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] It's not just where you farm; it's whether your neighbor does too. How agglomeration economies are shaping new agricultural landscapes
    Richards, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 18 (01) : 87 - 110
  • [22] Does functional assessment predict everyday visual functioning? Visual function testing and quality of life in mild/moderate age-related macular degeneration
    Broadhead, Geoffrey K.
    Hong, Thomas
    Grigg, John R.
    McCluskey, Peter
    Schlub, Timothy E.
    Spooner, Kimberly
    Chang, Andrew A.
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 40 (12) : 3241 - 3249
  • [23] Does functional assessment predict everyday visual functioning? Visual function testing and quality of life in mild/moderate age-related macular degeneration
    Geoffrey K. Broadhead
    Thomas Hong
    John R. Grigg
    Peter McCluskey
    Timothy E. Schlub
    Kimberly Spooner
    Andrew A. Chang
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 3241 - 3249
  • [24] Assessing the welfare level of intensive fattening pig farms in Germany with the Welfare Quality® protocol: does farm size matter?
    Meyer-Hamme, S. E. K.
    Lambertz, C.
    Gauly, M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2018, 27 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [25] Does Presentation Format Influence Visual Size Discrimination in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus spp.)?
    Truppa, Valentina
    Carducci, Paola
    Trapanese, Cinzia
    Hanus, Daniel
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [26] Influence of connectivity, habitat quality and invasive species on egg and larval distributions and local abundance of crucian carp in Japanese agricultural landscapes
    Matsuzaki, Shin-ichiro S.
    Terui, Akira
    Kodama, Kohji
    Tada, Masamitsu
    Yoshida, Takehito
    Washitani, Izumi
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (08) : 2081 - 2087
  • [27] Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis - Influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function
    Lee, YC
    Hu, FR
    Wang, IJ
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (04): : 769 - 777
  • [28] The Influence of Pupil Size on Visual Image Quality and Optimal Refraction during Simulated Spectacle Wear in Keratoconus
    Bell, Elizabeth Shumard
    Hastings, Gareth D.
    Rozema, Jos J.
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    Marsack, Jason D.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [29] Agricultural Best Management Practice Abundance and Location does not Influence Stream Ecosystem Function or Water Quality in the Summer Season
    Pearce, Nolan J. T.
    Yates, Adam G.
    WATER, 2015, 7 (12): : 6861 - 6876
  • [30] Nitrous oxide and N-leaching losses from agricultural soil: Influence of crop residue particle size, quality and placement
    Ambus, P
    Jensen, ES
    Robertson, GP
    PHYTON-ANNALES REI BOTANICAE, 2001, 41 (03) : 7 - 15