Machine learning models in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Ravindhran, Bharadhwaj [1 ,3 ]
Chandak, Pankaj [1 ,2 ]
Schafer, Nicole [1 ]
Kundalia, Kaushal [1 ]
Hwang, Woochan [1 ]
Antoniadis, Savvas [1 ]
Haroon, Usman [1 ]
Zakri, Rhana Hassan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Renal Transplantat, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Ctr Nephrol Urol & Transplantat, London, England
[3] Hull Royal Infirm, Acad Vasc Surg Unit, Hul HU3 2JZ, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2023年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
PRETRANSPLANT VARIABLES; RECIPIENTS; CARE; DISPARITIES; NOMOGRAMS; SELECTION; CONDUCT; SYSTEM; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zrad011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The variations in outcome and frequent occurrence of kidney allograft failure continue to pose important clinical and research challenges despite recent advances in kidney transplantation. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the current application of machine learning models in kidney transplantation and perform a meta-analysis of these models in the prediction of graft survival. Methods This review was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42021247469) and all peer-reviewed original articles that reported machine learning model-based prediction of graft survival were included. Quality assessment was performed by the criteria defined by Qiao and risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the PROBAST tool. The diagnostic performance of the meta-analysis was assessed by a meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic plot. Results A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review and 27 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Twenty-nine different machine learning models were used to predict graft survival in the included studies. Nine studies compared the predictive performance of machine learning models with traditional regression methods. Five studies had a high risk of bias and three studies had an unclear risk of bias. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 and the summary sensitivity and specificity of machine learning-based models were 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.76 to 0.86) and 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.86) respectively for the overall model. The diagnostic odds ratio for the overall model was 18.24 (95 per cent c.i. 11.00 to 30.16) and 29.27 (95 per cent c.i. 13.22 to 44.46) based on the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Prediction models using machine learning methods may improve the prediction of outcomes after kidney transplantation by the integration of the vast amounts of non-linear data. This systematic review explores the current application of machine learning models and performs a meta-analysis of these models in the prediction of graft survival after kidney transplantation. We aim to summarize the current available evidence, identify the best machine learning models suited for these outcomes, and the key challenges that need to be addressed to accurately guide future research in this topic. Prediction models using machine learning methods can better predict outcomes after kidney transplantation by the integration of the vast amounts of non-linear data.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of diabetes mellitus developing after kidney transplantation on patient mortality and graft survival: a meta-analysis of adjusted data
    Lin, Hailing
    Yan, Jiqiang
    Yuan, Lei
    Qi, Beibei
    Zhang, Zhujing
    Zhang, Wanlu
    Ma, Aihua
    Ding, Fuwan
    [J]. DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2021, 13 (01):
  • [32] Patient, kidney, and pancreas survival in pancreas after kidney transplantation versus simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: meta-analysis
    Xue, Wenrui
    Huang, Zhen
    Zhang, Yu
    Hu, Xiaopeng
    [J]. BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (05):
  • [33] Machine learning in predicting cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: A systemic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Zhe
    Yang, Zhenyu
    Hou, Ming
    Shi, Xuedong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [34] Predicting graft survival in pediatric kidney transplantation: Does the Box fit?
    Sypek, Matthew
    Francis, Anna
    Chadban, Steve
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (10) : 1481 - 1482
  • [35] Surgical learning curve in kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Outmani, Loubna
    IJzermans, Jan N. M.
    Minnee, Robert C.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION REVIEWS, 2020, 34 (04)
  • [36] Association between transplant glomerulopathy and graft outcomes following kidney transplantation: A meta-analysis
    Kovacs, Gabar
    Devercelli, Giovanna
    Zelei, Tamas
    Hirji, Ishan
    Voko, Zoltan
    Keown, Paul A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04):
  • [37] Predicting graft failure in pediatric liver transplantation based on early biomarkers using machine learning models
    Jung, Seungho
    Park, Kyemyung
    Ihn, Kyong
    Kim, Seon Ju
    Kim, Myoung Soo
    Chae, Dongwoo
    Koo, Bon-Nyeo
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [38] Predicting graft failure in pediatric liver transplantation based on early biomarkers using machine learning models
    Seungho Jung
    Kyemyung Park
    Kyong Ihn
    Seon Ju Kim
    Myoung Soo Kim
    Dongwoo Chae
    Bon-Nyeo Koo
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [39] Machine Learning Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Zheqing
    Yang, Luqian
    Han, Wentao
    Wu, Yaoyu
    Zhang, Linhui
    Gao, Chun
    Jiang, Kui
    Liu, Yun
    Wu, Huiqun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03)
  • [40] Combining machine learning with meta-analysis for predicting cytotoxicity of micro- and nanoplastics
    Xu, Jun-Li
    Lin, Xiaohui
    Gowen, Aoife A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ADVANCES, 2022, 8