Machine learning models in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Ravindhran, Bharadhwaj [1 ,3 ]
Chandak, Pankaj [1 ,2 ]
Schafer, Nicole [1 ]
Kundalia, Kaushal [1 ]
Hwang, Woochan [1 ]
Antoniadis, Savvas [1 ]
Haroon, Usman [1 ]
Zakri, Rhana Hassan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Renal Transplantat, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Ctr Nephrol Urol & Transplantat, London, England
[3] Hull Royal Infirm, Acad Vasc Surg Unit, Hul HU3 2JZ, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2023年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
PRETRANSPLANT VARIABLES; RECIPIENTS; CARE; DISPARITIES; NOMOGRAMS; SELECTION; CONDUCT; SYSTEM; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zrad011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The variations in outcome and frequent occurrence of kidney allograft failure continue to pose important clinical and research challenges despite recent advances in kidney transplantation. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the current application of machine learning models in kidney transplantation and perform a meta-analysis of these models in the prediction of graft survival. Methods This review was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42021247469) and all peer-reviewed original articles that reported machine learning model-based prediction of graft survival were included. Quality assessment was performed by the criteria defined by Qiao and risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the PROBAST tool. The diagnostic performance of the meta-analysis was assessed by a meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic plot. Results A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review and 27 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Twenty-nine different machine learning models were used to predict graft survival in the included studies. Nine studies compared the predictive performance of machine learning models with traditional regression methods. Five studies had a high risk of bias and three studies had an unclear risk of bias. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 and the summary sensitivity and specificity of machine learning-based models were 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.76 to 0.86) and 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.86) respectively for the overall model. The diagnostic odds ratio for the overall model was 18.24 (95 per cent c.i. 11.00 to 30.16) and 29.27 (95 per cent c.i. 13.22 to 44.46) based on the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Prediction models using machine learning methods may improve the prediction of outcomes after kidney transplantation by the integration of the vast amounts of non-linear data. This systematic review explores the current application of machine learning models and performs a meta-analysis of these models in the prediction of graft survival after kidney transplantation. We aim to summarize the current available evidence, identify the best machine learning models suited for these outcomes, and the key challenges that need to be addressed to accurately guide future research in this topic. Prediction models using machine learning methods can better predict outcomes after kidney transplantation by the integration of the vast amounts of non-linear data.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A machine learning framework for predicting long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation
    Badrouchi, Samarra
    Ahmed, Abdulaziz
    Bacha, Mohamed Mongi
    Abderrahim, Ezzedine
    Ben Abdallah, Taieb
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 182
  • [2] Predicting survival following liver transplantation using machine learning methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cloonan, Madeline
    Wilson, Ashia
    Merani, Shaheed
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 64 - 65
  • [3] Predicting graft and patient outcomes following kidney transplantation using interpretable machine learning models
    Salaun, Achille
    Knight, Simon
    Wingfield, Laura
    Zhu, Tingting
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [4] Graft Rejection Prediction Following Kidney Transplantation Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nursetyo, Aldilas Achmad
    Syed-Abdul, Shabbir
    Uddin, Mohy
    Li, Yu-Chuan
    [J]. MEDINFO 2019: HEALTH AND WELLBEING E-NETWORKS FOR ALL, 2019, 264 : 10 - 14
  • [5] Machine learning in predicting graft failure following kidney transplantation: A systematic review of published predictive models
    Senanayake, Sameera
    White, Nicole
    Graves, Nicholas
    Healy, Helen
    Baboolal, Keshwar
    Kularatna, Sanjeewa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 130
  • [6] Machine Learning in Kidney Transplantation: A New Possibility For the Graft Survival Prediction
    Ietto, Giuseppe
    Liepa, Linda
    Gallazzi, Mirco
    Morabito, Marika
    Ripamonti, Marta
    Masci, Federica
    Zani, Elia
    Iovino, Domenico
    Parise, Cristiano
    Zanchetta, Matteo
    Confalonieri, Dorotea
    Carcano, Giulio
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (09) : S622 - S622
  • [7] Comparison of machine learning and logistic regression models in predicting acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Xuan
    Liu, Xinyan
    Liu, Fei
    Wang, Chunting
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 151
  • [8] The Ensembles of Machine Learning Methods for Survival Predicting after Kidney Transplantation
    Tolstyak, Yaroslav
    Zhuk, Rostyslav
    Yakovlev, Igor
    Shakhovska, Nataliya
    Ml, Michal Gregus
    Chopyak, Valentyna
    Melnykova, Nataliia
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (21):
  • [9] Predicting graft survival in paediatric kidney transplant recipients using machine learning
    Aksoy, Guelsah Kaya
    Akcay, Hueseyin Goekhan
    Ari, Caglar
    Adar, Mehtap
    Koyun, Mustafa
    Comak, Elif
    Akman, Sema
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2024,
  • [10] The global survival rate of graft and patient in kidney transplantation of children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mousa Ghelichi-Ghojogh
    Fateme Mohammadizadeh
    Fatemeh Jafari
    Mouhebat Vali
    Sepideh Jahanian
    Masoud Mohammadi
    Alireza Jafari
    Rozhan Khezri
    Hossein-Ali Nikbakht
    Masumeh Daliri
    Abdolhalim Rajabi
    [J]. BMC Pediatrics, 22