Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

被引:13
|
作者
Hawkins, Robert B. [1 ,2 ]
Deeb, G. Michael [1 ,2 ]
Sukul, Devraj [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Himanshu J. [1 ,2 ]
Gualano, Sarah K. [1 ,2 ]
Chetcuti, Stanley J. [1 ,2 ]
Grossman, P. Michael [1 ,2 ]
Ailawadi, Gorav [1 ,2 ]
Fukuhara, Shinichi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Cardiac Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Div Cardiovasc Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, 1500 East Med Ctr Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
aortic stenosis; reoperation; Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database; surgical aortic valve replacement; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; OUTCOMES; REGURGITATION; STENOSIS; TAVR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Aortic stenosis treatment should consider risks and benefits for lifetime management. Although the feasibility of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear, concerns are emerging regarding reoperation after TAVR.OBJECTIVES The authors sought to define comparative risk of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) after prior TAVR or SAVR.METHODS Data on patients undergoing bioprosthetic SAVR after TAVR and/or SAVR were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database (2011-2021). Overall and isolated SAVR cohorts were analyzed. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Risk adjustment using hierarchical logistic regression as well as propensity score matching for iso-lated SAVR cases were performed.RESULTS Of 31,106 SAVR patients, 1,126 had prior TAVR (TAVR-SAVR), 674 had prior SAVR and TAVR (SAVR-TAVR-SAVR), and 29,306 had prior SAVR (SAVR-SAVR). Yearly rates of TAVR-SAVR and SAVR-TAVR-SAVR increased over time, whereas SAVR-SAVR was stable. The TAVR-SAVR patients were older, with higher acuity, and with greater comorbidities than other cohorts. The unadjusted operative mortality was highest in the TAVR-SAVR group (17% vs 12% vs 9%, respectively; P < 0.001). Compared with SAVR-SAVR, risk-adjusted operative mortality was significantly higher for TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.53; P = 0.004), but not SAVR-TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.02; P = 0.927). After propensity score matching, operative mortality of isolated SAVR was 1.74 times higher for TAVR-SAVR than SAVR-SAVR patients (P = 0.020).CONCLUSIONS The number of post-TAVR reoperations is increasing and represent a high-risk population. Yet even in isolated SAVR cases, SAVR after TAVR is independently associated with increased risk of mortality. Patients with life expectancy beyond a TAVR valve and unsuitable anatomy for redo-TAVR should consider a SAVR-first approach. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:942-953)(c) 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:942 / 953
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Zhang, Xinlin
    Xu, Biao
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 166 (08) : 605 - 605
  • [12] Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis
    Thakkar, Badal
    Patel, Aashay
    Mohamad, Bashar
    Patel, Nileshkumar J.
    Bhatt, Parth
    Bhimani, Ronak
    Patel, Achint
    Arora, Shilpkumar
    Savani, Chirag
    Solanki, Shantanu
    Sonani, Rajesh
    Patel, Samir
    Patel, Nilay
    Deshmukh, Abhishek
    Mohamad, Tamam
    Grines, Cindy
    Cleman, Michael
    Mangi, Abeel
    Forrest, John
    Badheka, Apurva O.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (05) : 955 - 962
  • [13] Redo in aortic homograft replacement: Transcatheter aortic valve as a valid alternative to surgical replacement
    Dainese, Luca
    Fusari, Melissa
    Trabattoni, Piero
    Biglioli, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 139 (06): : 1656 - 1657
  • [14] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmed, Adham
    Levy, Kenneth H.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (07) : 2486 - 2495
  • [15] Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach
    Choi, Charles H.
    Cao, Kevin
    Malaver, Diego
    Kincaid, Edward H.
    Lata, Adrian
    Kon, Neal
    Belford, P. Matthew
    Gandhi, Sanjay K.
    Applegate, Robert J.
    Zhao, David X. M.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 99 (01) : 181 - 192
  • [16] Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Superior to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement?
    Pagnesi, Matteo
    Chiarito, Mauro
    Stefanini, Giulio G.
    Testa, Luca
    Reimers, Bernhard
    Colombo, Antonio
    Latib, Azeem
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (18) : 1899 - 1901
  • [17] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement as Redo Procedure After Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Stortecky, Stefan
    Brinks, Henriette
    Wenaweser, Peter
    Huber, Christoph
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Windecker, Stephan
    Carrel, Thierry
    Kadner, Alexander
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (04): : 1324 - 1330
  • [18] Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses
    Silaschi, Miriam
    Wendler, Olaf
    Seiffert, Moritz
    Castro, Liesa
    Lubos, Edith
    Schirmer, Johannes
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Schaefer, Ulrich
    Treede, Hendrik
    MacCarthy, Philip
    Conradi, Lenard
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 24 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [19] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of Aortic Stenosis Management
    Sattar, Yasar
    Rauf, Hiba
    Bareeqa, Syeda Beenish
    Ullah, Waqas
    Myla, Madhura
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [20] Meta-analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Takagi, Hisato
    Mitta, Shohei
    Ando, Tomo
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2019, 67 (04): : 243 - 250