The application of artificial technology in pediatric pyeloplasty the efficacy analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Hu, Zhongli [1 ]
Chen, Shan [2 ]
Wang, Zhihong [3 ]
Xu, Di [4 ]
Zhang, Xiaolang [4 ]
Lin, Yang [4 ]
Zhang, Lin [4 ]
Wang, Jianbin [4 ]
Li, Lizhi [4 ]
机构
[1] Putian Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Putian, Peoples R China
[2] Fuzhou Second Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Prov Clin Med Coll, Dept Hematol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Shengli Clin Med Coll, Dept Pediat Surg, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS | 2023年 / 11卷
关键词
UPJO; RALP; LP; Pediatric; ERAS; URETEROVASCULAR HYDRONEPHROSIS; CHILDREN; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3389/fped.2023.1209359
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of the da Vinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloureteroplasty (RALP) in treating pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 32 children with UPJO who suffered from RALP in our hospital from October 2020 to February 2023, compared with those treated with common laparoscopy at the same time. After the establishment of the robotic arm, a mesenteric approach was performed after entering the abdominal cavity to focus on the lesion site. The dilated renal pelvis was then cut and the stenotic ureter was removed; the anastomosis and the incision were sutured by layer.ResultsA total of 62 children (44 boys and 20 girls) with a median age of 14 months (ranging from 3 to 38 months) were included. All 62 cases had hydronephrosis caused by unilateral UPJO, and the surgery was successfully completed without conversion to open. All intraoperative blood losses amounted to less than 10 ml. In the RALP group, the average operative duration was 131.28 min (ranging from 108 to 180 min). The average catheter time was 3.66 days (ranging from 2 to 7 days). The average hematuria time was 3.84 days (ranging from 2 to 6 days). The average postoperative hospital stay was 7.8 days (ranging from 6 to 12 days). The average hospitalization costs were 59,048.31 yuan (ranging from 50,484 to 69,977 yuan). The double-J tube was removed 1 month after surgery. Only one patient suffered from complications, developing a urinary tract infection 4 weeks after surgery, and was cured with the administration of oral cefaclor anti-inflammatory drugs for 3 days. All patients were followed up for 2-28 months, with a median follow-up time of 12 months. The thickness of the renal cortex was increased after surgery [(1.95 & PLUSMN; 0.24) vs. (4.82 & PLUSMN; 0.50)] cm, and the isotope renograms revealed a definite recovery of the split renal function [(28.32 & PLUSMN; 1.95) vs. (37.01 & PLUSMN; 2.71)]%.ConclusionThe robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloureteroplasty (RALP) in the treatment of children with upper ureteral obstruction has overall clinical efficiency. With technological advancements and an increased number of experienced surgeons, robotic surgery may become a new trend in surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)
    Gonzalez, Sebastian Tobia
    Rosito, Tiago E.
    Tur, Anna Bujons
    Ruiz, Javier
    Gozalbez, Rafael
    Maiolo, Anabella
    Tavares, Patric M.
    Horta Gorgen, Antonio Rebello
    de Kencht, Erika Llorens
    Madarriaga, Yesica Quiroz
    Weller, Santiago
    Tobia, Ignacio Pablo
    Castellan, Miguel
    Corbetta, Juan Pablo
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2022, 48 (06): : 961 - 968
  • [42] PEDIATRIC ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY IN HORSESHOE KIDNEY
    Granberg, Candace F.
    DaJusta, Daniel
    Gargollo, Patricio
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E236 - E237
  • [43] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children
    Abdel-Karim, A. M.
    Fahmy, A.
    Moussa, A.
    Rashad, H.
    Elbadry, M.
    Badawy, H.
    Hammady, A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2016, 12 (06) : 401.e1 - 401.e6
  • [44] PEDIATRIC LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY AND ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY: A COMPARATIVE SINGLE-INSTITUTION STUDY
    Riachy, Edward
    Defoor, W. Robert
    Reddy, Pramod P.
    Minevich, Eugene A.
    Alam, Shumyle
    Noh, Paul H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E191 - E192
  • [45] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the standard of care for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Kapoor, Anil
    Allard, Christopher B.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (02): : 136 - 138
  • [46] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Park, Young Hyeon
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A142 - A142
  • [48] Laparoscopic transperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Vijayanand, Dhakshinamoorthy
    Rix, David
    Soomro, Naeem
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (12) : 1050 - 1053
  • [49] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus robotic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a series of 60 cases performed by a single surgeon
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Mukherjee, Satyadip
    Singh, Kaku
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (01) : 5012 - 5016
  • [50] Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Basatac, Cem
    Boylu, Ugur
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Gumus, Eyup
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 40 (01): : 24 - 30