The cross-sectional area ratio of a specific part of the flexor pollicis longus tendon- a stable sonographic measurement for trigger thumb: a cross-sectional trial

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Wenbin [1 ]
Zhou, Huan [2 ]
Hu, Zhe [1 ]
Chen, Hongyan [1 ]
Liu, Juan [1 ]
Li, Jin [1 ]
Feng, Xiaoyuan [2 ]
Li, Xueqin [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan Hosp 4, Puai Hosp, Tongji Med Coll,Ultrasonog Dept, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan Childrens Hosp, Wuhan Maternal & Child Healthcare Hosp, Tongji Med Coll,Childrens Heart Ctr, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
关键词
High Frequency Ultrasound; Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon; Trigger Finger; APPEARANCE; MANAGEMENT; FINGER; PULLEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06316-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundTrigger thumb is a pathologic condition of the digital pulleys and flexor tendons. To find a cutoff value of the cross-sectional area ratio of specific parts of the flexor pollicis longus tendon to diagnosis trigger thumb in the high-frequency ultrasound examination.MethodsWe evaluated 271 healthy volunteers and 57 patients with clinical diagnosis of trigger thumb. The cross-sectional area of the metacarpophalangeal joint of flexor pollicis longus tendon (C1) and the cross-sectional area of the midpoint of the first metacarpal of flexor pollicis longus tendon (C2) were analyzed.ResultsThere is no difference between gender, age and left and right hands in the ratio of C1 to C2 (C1/ C2). The mean of C1/ C2 in the healthy thumb was 0.983 +/- 0.103, which was significantly smaller in comparison to the diseased thumb (P < 0.05). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, we chose the diagnostic cut-off value for the C1/ C2 to be 1.362 and 1.153 in order to differ a trigger thumb from children and adults.ConclusionsThe C1/ C2 of the healthy thumb was relatively stable, with a mean value of 0.983 +/- 0.103. The cutoff value of C1/C2 to distinguish healthy thumb from diseased thumb in children and adults were 1.362 and 1.153, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sonographic measurement of cross-sectional area of the median nerve in diabetic patients and control subjects
    Tan, M.
    Yildirim, T.
    Yerdelen, D.
    Goksel, B. K.
    Karaca, S.
    Alkan, O.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 17 : 298 - 298
  • [22] REACTION OF TENDON TO ISOLATION OF PORTION OF ITS CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
    WALKER, LB
    HARRIS, EH
    BENEDICT, JV
    ANATOMICAL RECORD, 1966, 154 (02): : 438 - &
  • [23] Accuracy of MRI technique in measuring tendon cross-sectional area
    Couppe, C.
    Svensson, R. B.
    Sodring-Elbrond, V.
    Hansen, P.
    Kjaer, M.
    Magnusson, S. P.
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 34 (03) : 237 - 241
  • [24] A new diagnostic morphological parameter for the Carpal tunnel syndrome: The palmaris longus tendon cross-sectional area
    Joo, Young
    Moon, JeeYoun
    Lee, Yoon Jin
    Bang, Yun-Sic
    Yi, Jungmin
    Jang, Jae Ni
    Su, Min-Ying
    Kim, Young Uk
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (40) : E30906
  • [26] Ultrasonographic measurement of the cross-sectional area of the axillary nerve
    Yoon, Joon Shik
    Park, Jung Hyun
    Levin, Joshua
    Roh, Eugene Y.
    Park, Hye Jung
    Won, Sun Jae
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2019, 60 (01) : 95 - 98
  • [27] VALUES OF SPECIFIC CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF VARIOUS MATERIALS
    LYONS, WJ
    TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1966, 36 (02) : 204 - &
  • [28] MEASUREMENT OF CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF BODIES WITH COMPLEX FORM
    ORZHEVSKII, OB
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES-USSR, 1964, (09): : 728 - &
  • [29] Sonographic Evaluation of Supraspinatus Cross-sectional Area in Collegiate Baseball Players
    Malanga, Gerard A.
    Chu, Samuel K.
    Del Toro, Jose Ramirez
    Karnaugh, Ronald D.
    Dentico, Richard
    Komaroff, Eugene
    PM&R, 2012, 4 (07) : 488 - 492
  • [30] Peroneus Longus Split Versus Semitendinosus Tendon Autograft Size: A Cross-sectional Study
    Wierer, Guido
    Gwinner, Clemens
    Scheffler, Sven
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (07): : 1743 - 1751