Intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes

被引:8
|
作者
Zorzato, Pier Carlo [1 ]
Uccella, Stefano [1 ]
Biancotto, Giulia [1 ]
Bosco, Mariachiara [1 ]
Festi, Anna [1 ]
Franchi, Massimo [1 ]
Garzon, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Azienda Osped Univ Integrata Verona, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Verona, Italy
关键词
endometrial neoplasms; hysterectomy; intrauterine manipulator; lympho- vascular space invasion; overall survival; peritoneal cytology; recurrence-free survival; MINIMALLY INVASIVE HYSTERECTOMY; TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHOVASCULAR SPACE INVASION; POSITIVE PERITONEAL CYTOLOGY; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; UTERINE MANIPULATORS; ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY; RECURRENCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effects on oncologic outcomes of intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed by an expert librarian in STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies in the English language that compared oncologic outcomes (recurrence-free, cause-specific, or overall survival) between endometrial cancer patients who underwent total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer with vs without the use of an intrauterine manipulator. Studies comparing only peritoneal cytology status or lymphovascular space invasion were summarized for completeness. No selection criteria were applied to the study design. METHODS: Four reviewers independently reviewed studies for inclusion, assessed their risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for oncologic outcomes using the random effect model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 tests. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and Egger test. RESULTS: Out of 350 identified references, we included 2 randomized controlled trials and 12 observational studies for a total of 14 studies and 5,019 patients. The use of an intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was associated with a pooled hazard ratio for recurrence of 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.33; P=.05; I2=31%; chi square P value=.22). Pooled hazard ratio for recurrence was 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.25-8.76; P=.62; I2=67%; chi square P value=.08) when only randomized controlled trials were considered. Pooled hazard ratio for overall survival was 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.76; P=0.79; I2=44%; chi square P value=.17). The rate of positive peritoneal cytology or lymphovascular space invasion did not differ using an intrauterine manipulator. CONCLUSION: Intrauterine manipulator use during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer was neither significantly associated with recurrence-free and overall survival nor with positive peritoneal cytology or lymphovascular space invasion, but further prospective studies are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 198.e4
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: association for pathological factors and oncologic outcomes
    Yoshida, Hiroshi
    Matsuo, Koji
    Machida, Hiroko
    Matsuzaki, Shinya
    Maeda, Michihide
    Terai, Yoshito
    Fujii, Takuma
    Mandai, Masaki
    Kawana, Kei
    Kobayashi, Hiroaki
    Mikami, Mikio
    Nagase, Satoru
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (04) : 510 - 518
  • [2] Intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: association for pathological factors and oncologic outcomes
    Padilla-Iserte, Pablo
    Domingo, Santiago
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (07) : 1116 - 1116
  • [3] Correspondence on 'Intrauterine manipulator use during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: association for pathological factors and oncologic outcomes' by Yoshida et al
    Selcuk, Ilker
    Yalcin, Hakan Rasit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (07) : 1117 - 1117
  • [4] Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Oderkerk, Tamara J.
    Beelen, Pleun
    Bukkems, Ardy L. A.
    Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Sluijter, Hilde M. M.
    van de Kar, Mileen R. D.
    Herman, Malou C.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (01): : 51 - 60
  • [5] Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
    Anderson, C.
    Uman, G.
    Pigazzi, A.
    [J]. EJSO, 2008, 34 (10): : 1135 - 1142
  • [6] The effects of uterine manipulators in minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meng, Yifan
    Liu, Yan
    Lin, Shitong
    Cao, Canhui
    Wu, Ping
    Gao, Peipei
    Zhi, Wenhua
    Peng, Ting
    Gui, Lingli
    Wu, Peng
    [J]. EJSO, 2020, 46 (07): : 1225 - 1232
  • [7] Metformin use and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Weimin
    Li, Tianjia
    Yang, Jing
    Shang, Mengmeng
    Xiao, Ying
    Li, Qian
    Yang, Jiaxin
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (42) : 73079 - 73086
  • [8] Adiponectin and Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zeng, Fangxin
    Shi, Jinyu
    Long, Yang
    Tian, Haoming
    Li, Xiaoxi
    Zhao, Allan Z.
    Li, Rose Fanghong
    Chen, Tao
    [J]. CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 36 (04) : 1670 - 1678
  • [9] Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Reply
    Oderkerk, Tamara J.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (05): : 1262 - 1263
  • [10] Effect of bariatric surgery on oncologic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tee, May C.
    Cao, Yin
    Warnock, Garth L.
    Hu, Frank B.
    Chavarro, Jorge E.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (12): : 4449 - 4456