Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Oderkerk, Tamara J. [1 ,2 ]
Beelen, Pleun
Bukkems, Ardy L. A.
Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Sluijter, Hilde M. M.
van de Kar, Mileen R. D.
Herman, Malou C.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
机构
[1] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Growsch Oncol & Reprod, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2023年 / 142卷 / 01期
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; THERMAL BALLOON ABLATION; LEVONORGESTREL INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM; TRANSCERVICAL RESECTION; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; MULTICENTER; MENORRHAGIA; WOMEN; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000005223
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of hysterectomy after nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding.DATA SOURCES: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible articles from inception until June 13, 2022. We used combinations of search terms for endometrial ablation and hysterectomy.METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Articles included in the review described the incidence of hysterectomy at a specific point in time after ablation with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months.TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The literature search yielded a total of 3,022 hits. A total of 53 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, including six retrospective studies, 24 randomized controlled trials, and 23 prospective studies. A total of 48,071 patients underwent endometrial ablation between 1992 and 2017. Follow-up duration varied between 12 and 120 months. Analyses per follow-up moment showed 4.3% hysterectomy rate at 12 months of follow-up (n=29 studies), 11.1% at 18 months (n=1 study), 8.0% at 24 months (n=11 studies), 10.2% at 36 months (n=12 studies), 7.6% at 48 months (n=2 studies), and 12.4% at 60 months (n=6 studies). Two studies reported a mean hysterectomy rate at 10 years after ablation of 21.3%. Minimal clinically relevant differences in hysterectomy rates were observed among the different study designs. Furthermore, we found no significant differences in hysterectomy rate among the different nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation devices.CONCLUSION: The risk of hysterectomy after endometrial ablation seems to increase from 4.3% after 1 year to 12.4% after 5 years. Clinicians can use the results of this review to counsel patients about the 12% risk of hysterectomy 5 years after endometrial ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 60
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Reply
    Oderkerk, Tamara J.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (05): : 1262 - 1263
  • [2] Systematic review, meta-analysis and statistical analysis of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. endometrial ablation
    Marchand, Greg J.
    Azadi, Ali
    Sainz, Katelyn
    Masoud, Ahmed
    Anderson, Sienna
    Ruther, Stacy
    Ware, Kelly
    Hopewell, Sophia
    Brazil, Giovanna
    King, Alexa
    Vallejo, Jannelle
    Cieminski, Kaitlynne
    Galitsky, Anthony
    Steele, Allison
    Love, Jennifer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 22 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [3] Hysterectomy and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaqin Huo
    Liang Yao
    Xue Han
    Wen Li
    Junjuan Liu
    Lijun Zhou
    Yuanfeng Gou
    Kehu Yang
    Huiling Liu
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 299 : 599 - 607
  • [4] Hysterectomy and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huo, Xiaqin
    Yao, Liang
    Han, Xue
    Li, Wen
    Liu, Junjuan
    Zhou, Lijun
    Gou, Yuanfeng
    Yang, Kehu
    Liu, Huiling
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 299 (03) : 599 - 607
  • [5] Prognostic Factors for the Failure of Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Beelen, Pleun
    Reinders, Imke M. A.
    Scheepers, Wessel F. W.
    Herman, Malou C.
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2020, 75 (03) : 158 - 159
  • [6] Prognostic Factors for the Failure of Endometrial Ablation A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Beelen, Pleun
    Reinders, Imke M. A.
    Scheepers, Wessel F. W.
    Herman, Malou C.
    Geomini, M. A. J.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 134 (06): : 1269 - 1281
  • [7] Endometrial ablation and resection versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications
    Deehan, Clare
    Georganta, Iliana
    Strachan, Anna
    Thomson, Marysia
    McDonald, Miriam
    McNulty, Kerrie
    Anderson, Elizabeth
    Mostafa, Alyaa
    [J]. OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2023, 66 (05) : 364 - 384
  • [8] Risk factors for postoperative ileus in hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hou, Zhuoer
    Liu, Ting
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Lv, Hangpeng
    Sun, Qiuhua
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [9] Risk of colorectal cancer with hysterectomy and oophorectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luo, Ganfeng
    Zhang, Yanting
    Wang, Li
    Huang, Yuanwei
    Yu, Qiuyan
    Guo, Pi
    Li, Ke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 34 : 88 - 95
  • [10] Regarding "Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation"
    Mccausland, Vance
    Mccausland, Arthur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : 68 - 68