Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Henson, Rosie Mae [1 ]
Purtle, Jonathan [2 ]
Headen, Irene [3 ]
Stankov, Ivana [4 ,5 ]
Langellier, Brent A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Management & Policy, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] NYU, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Community Hlth & Prevent, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Urban Hlth Collaborat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ South Australia, Allied Hlth & Human Performance Acad Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Health policy; Health Equity; PUBLIC HEALTH; Community-Based Participatory Research; Decision Making; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Public policymakers are increasingly engaged in participatory model building processes, such as group model building. Understanding the impacts of policymaker participation in these processes on policymakers is important given that their decisions often have significant influence on the dynamics of complex systems that affect health. Little is known about the extent to which the impacts of participatory model building on public policymakers have been evaluated or the methods and measures used to evaluate these impacts.Methods and analysis A scoping review protocol was developed with the objectives of: (1) scoping studies that have evaluated the impacts of facilitated participatory model building processes on public policymakers who participated in these processes; and (2) describing methods and measures used to evaluate impacts and the main findings of these evaluations. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Population, Concept, Context framework was used to formulate the article identification process. Seven electronic databases-MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medical, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Complete and PsycInfo-will be searched. Identified articles will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist for scoping reviews will be used and reported. A data extraction tool will collect information across three domains: study characteristics, methods and measures, and findings. The review will be conducted using Covidence, a systematic review data management platform.Ethics and dissemination The scoping review produced will generate an overview of how public policymaker engagement in participatory model building processes has been evaluated. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and to communities of practice that convene policymakers in participatory model building processes. This review will not require ethics approval because it is not human subject research.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A scoping review to evaluate the impact of prescription drug monitoring program implementation
    Finley, Erin
    Garcia, Ashley
    Rosen, Kristen
    Tami, Claudina
    McGeary, Don
    Pugh, Mary Jo
    Potter, Jennifer Sharpe
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [32] Prevention of War: A Scoping Review on Primary Preventive Measures in Public Health
    Brake, Tessa-Maria
    Razum, Oliver
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS, 2024, 44
  • [33] Designing infographics in health research with patients and the public: A scoping review protocol
    Beecher, Blaze
    O'Doherty, Alan
    Goulao, Beatriz
    Jalali, Amirhossein
    Salsberg, Jon
    Dore, Liz
    Hannigan, Ailish
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (09):
  • [34] Public health interventions to prevent adolescent vaping: a scoping review protocol
    Dicasmirro, Jamie
    Tranmer, Joan
    Davison, Colleen
    Woo, Kevin
    Ross-White, Amanda
    Hubeny, Michael
    Goldie, Catherine
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (11) : 2272 - 2278
  • [35] Examining the utilization of participatory research with autistic youth in mainstream/public schools: a scoping review
    Newson, Alexandra
    Quinn, Sarah
    Nese, Rhonda N. T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 8
  • [36] Patient-reported outcome measures in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol
    Poulsen, Ninna Rysholt
    Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen
    Sovso, Morten Breinholt
    Leutscher, Peter Derek Christian
    Pedersen, Mona Kyndi
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (11) : 3102 - 3112
  • [37] Identifying optimal frameworks to implement or evaluate digital health interventions: a scoping review protocol
    Soobiah, Charlene
    Cooper, Madeline
    Kishimoto, Vanessa
    Bhatia, R. Sacha
    Scott, Ted
    Maloney, Shelagh
    Larsen, Darren
    Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
    Zelmer, Jennifer
    Gray, Carolyn Steele
    Desveaux, Laura
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (08): : e037643
  • [38] Methods to elicit and evaluate the attainment of patient goals in older adults: A scoping review
    Damiaens, Amber
    Maes, Evelien
    Van Roosbroek, Hanne
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Foulon, Veerle
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (10) : 3051 - 3061
  • [39] Methods: to elicit and evaluate the attainment of patient goals in older adults: a scoping review
    Damiaens, Amber
    Kenis, Ilyse
    Maes, Evelien
    Vanroosbroek, Hanne
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Foulon, Veerle
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 109 : 99 - 99
  • [40] Drawing Out Their Stories: A Scoping Review of Participatory Visual Research Methods With Newcomer Children
    Brown, Alison
    Spencer, Rebecca
    McIsaac, Jessie-Lee
    Howard, Vivian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2020, 19