A Survey for Examining the Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Forensic Psychiatric Nursing Competence Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Matsuura, Kayo [1 ]
Timmons, David [2 ]
Takano, Ayumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Care Sci, Dept Mental Hlth & Psychiat Nursing, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Natl Forens Mental Hlth Serv, Cent Mental Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Forensic psychiatry; forensic mental health nursing; clinical competence; inpatients; community mental health services; COEFFICIENT; VALIDATION; CRITERIA; QUALITY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1080/14999013.2022.2140227
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This study aimed to authenticate the validity and reliability of the 40-item Japanese version of the Forensic Psychiatric Nursing Competence (FPNC-J) scale. We used the FPNC-J scale and conducted anonymous online surveys with 213 nurses who worked in the forensic psychiatric wards, assessed the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and structural and convergent validities. The goodness-of-fit indices showed a poor fit. An exploratory factor analysis identified four factors. Cronbach's a and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient indicated moderately good reliability. This suggests that the FPNC-J scale is useful for measuring competence in forensic mental health nursing practice.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 221
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BRAZILIAN VERSION OF THE NURSING PROFESSIONAL VALUES SCALE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
    Rached, Chennyfer Dobbins Abi
    Ferreira, Victoria Christine Gomes
    Santos, Julia do Nascimento
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2023, 31 (02) : 163 - 172
  • [32] Translation, reliability, and validity of Japanese version of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale
    Sakuramoto, Hideaki
    Hatozaki, Chie
    Unoki, Takeshi
    Aikawa, Gen
    Kobayashi, Shunsuke
    Okamoto, Saiko
    Shimomura, Shinichi
    Kawasaki, Ayako
    Fukui, Miwako
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [33] Validity and reliability of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale-Japanese version
    Kitano, Masato
    Shoji, Kotaro
    Nakaita, Ikumi
    Sano, Shinya
    Tachibana, Shoichi
    Bride, Brian E.
    Shigemura, Jun
    Waki, Fumiko
    Noguchi, Norihito
    Koga, Minori
    Toda, Hiroyuki
    Yoshino, Aihide
    Shimizu, Kunio
    Nagamine, Masanori
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 41 (04) : 476 - 484
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale
    Asai, Keigo
    Hiraizumi, Taku
    Hanzawa, Reino
    [J]. BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Pregnancy and Weight Gain Attitude Scale
    Kurashima, Yuki
    Shiraishi, Mie
    Harada, Rio
    Chiba, Takako
    Matsuzaki, Masayo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [36] Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Scale
    Hamatani, Sayo
    Matsumoto, Kazuki
    Lindner, Philip
    Shimizu, Eiji
    Mizuno, Yoshifumi
    Andersson, Gerhard
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES REPORTS, 2024, 3 (01):
  • [37] Development of the Japanese version of the stroke stigma scale: a validity and reliability assessment
    Kitamura, Shin
    Miyamoto, Reiko
    Watanabe, Shota
    Yoshida, Taiki
    Ishii, Yoshikazu
    [J]. TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2024, 31 (07) : 745 - 754
  • [38] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF JAPANESE VERSION OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE KNOWLEDGE SCALE
    Amano, T.
    Yamanaka, K.
    Carpenter, B. D.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2015, 55 : 723 - 723
  • [39] Development of a Japanese version of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale: Reliability and validity
    Yamaguchi, Sosei
    Koike, Shinsuke
    Watanabe, Kei-ichiro
    Ando, Shuntaro
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2014, 68 (06) : 448 - 455
  • [40] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale
    Amano, Takashi
    Yamanaka, Katsuo
    Carpenter, Brian D.
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 18 (02): : 599 - 612